Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In information systems, data are processed in various stages, and at every stage value is added in order to make the data useful for end users. Experts from different fields can assist these value-adding processes in various ways. This article discusses a theoretical model for determination of value-added processes in information systems. In this model, vital elements of every information system, that is, its goals, users, services and data, form a three-dimensional space. Each of these dimensions and the possible processes to add value in each dimension are discussed.

Keywords

Information systems information systems design Taylor’s model TEDS model user environments value-added model value-adding processes

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anagnostelis

Cooke

(1997) Evaluation criteria for different versions of the same database: a comparison of Medline services available via the world wide web. In: Raitt

Blake

Jeapes

(eds) International Online Information Meeting, London: Learned Information (Europe) Ltd, pp. 165–179.

Bailey

Pearson

(1983) Development of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Management Science 29(5): 530–545.

Cisco

Strong

(1999) The value added information chain. Information Management Journal 33(1): 4–13.

Eisenberg

Dirks

(2008) Taylor’s value-added model: still relevant after all these years. Available at: https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/15081(accessed 30 July 2013).

Fattahi

Afshar

(2006) Added value of information and information systems: a conceptual approach. Library review 55((2)):132–147. Available at: http://eprints.rclis.org/8391/1/Fattahi-Afshar,_Added-value-of-information.pdf (accessed 30 July 2013).

Groote

(2000) PubMed, Internet Grateful Med and Ovid: a comparison of three MEDLINE interface. Medical reference service quarterly 19(4): 1–13.

Jatkevicus

Sebold

(2000) The ERIC database: choosing among free and fee-based options. College and Undergraduate Libraries 7(2):95–103.

Khoshroo

Fatemi

(2010) SEMAT, National Current Research Information System for Iran. Available at: http://www.eurocris.org/Uploads/Web%20pages/cris2010_papers/Papers/cris2010_Khoshroo.pdf (accessed 07/01/2015).

Kielgast

Hubbard

(1997) Value-added information-from theory to practice. Available at: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S0100-19651997000300007&script=sci_arttext (accessed 30 July 2013).

10.

Kottai

(1993) Medicine on CD-ROM: a comparsion of dialog on disc and silverplatter interface. Library Science with a Slant to Documentation and Information Studies 30(1): 11–16.

11.

Notess

(1998) Free Medlines on the web. Database 21(3): 71–74.

12.

Palmquist

(2005) Taylor’s information use environment. In: Fisher

Erdelez

Mckechine

(eds) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford: Information Today, for ASIST, pp. 354–357.

13.

Piccoli

(2007) Information Systems for Managers: Text & Cases. New York: Wiley.

14.

Pimentel

(2009) The KO roots of Taylor’s value-added model. Available at: http://arizona.openrepository.com/arizona/handle/10150/105598 (accessed 25 July 2013).

15.

Scholl

Eisenberg

Dirks

Carlson

(2011) The TEDS framework for assessing information systems from a human actors’ perspective: extending and repurposing Taylor’s value-added model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 62(4):789–804.

16.

Schopfel

(2013) Adding value to electronic thesis and dissertations in institutional repositories, D-lib Magazine, 19(3,4). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march13/schopfel/03schopfel.html (accessed 15 September 2014).

17.

Taylor

(1982) Value-added processes in the information life cycle. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 33(5): 341–347.

18.

Taylor

(1986) Value-Added Processes in Information Systems: (Communication and Information Science). Philadelphia: Ablex Publishing Corporation, chapter 4, pp. 48–70.

19.

Tenopir

Hover

(1993) When is the same database not the same? Database differences among systems. Online 17(4): 20–27.