■ Sociological analysts of the European public sphere (EPS) are not great believers in the assumption that an EPS will emerge. The argument stems from cumulative empirical evidence stating that contemporary communication structures and practices do not live up to the ideals of the public sphere; not even in their moderate forms. While this line of analysis is useful, it runs the risk of ignoring the fact that the public sphere is not a fixed, but an emergent concept. In order to safeguard this emergent aspect, it is proposed that we should move forward from `insofar as' questions and start looking for social imaginaries of an EPS in more `unlikely places'. A plausible object for such scrutiny would be the European Union and its information policies. ■
Asen, Robert (2002) `Imagining in the Public Sphere', Philosophy and Rhetoric35(4): 345—67.
2.
Beck, Ulrich (2003) 'Toward a New Critical Theory with a Cosmopolitan Intent', Constellations10(4): 444—68.
3.
Benhabib, Seyla (1999) Democracy and Di ference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4.
Brüggemann, Michael (2005) `How the EU Constructs the European Public Sphere: Seven Strategies of Information Policy', Javnost — The Public12(2): 57—74.
5.
Dahlberg, Leif (2006) `The European Commission and European Public Spheres' , paper presented to the `Public Sphere and its Boundaries' conference, Tampere, May.
6.
De Vreese, Claes, Peter Jochen and Holli A. Semetko (2001) `Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National Comparative Study of Frames in the News', Political Communication18(2): 107—22.
7.
Dewey, John (1991) The Public and its Problems. Athens: Swallow Press/Ohio University Press. (Orig. pub. 1927.)
8.
European Commission (2005a) Eurobarometer 62: Public Opinion in the European Union. Brussels: European Commission Directorate General Press and Communication.
9.
European Commission (2005b) ` Action Plan to Improve Communicating Europe by the Commission', European Commission Directorate General Press and Communication; at: ec.europa.eu/dgs/communication/pdf/communication_com_en.pdf (accessed 5 June 2007).
10.
European Commission (2006) ` White Paper on a European Communication Policy', European Commission Directorate General Press and Communication; at: ec.europa.eu/communication_white_paper/doc/white_paper_en.pdf (accessed 5 June 2007).
11.
Fraser, Nancy (1992) `Rethinking the Public Sphere', pp. 109—42 in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Fraser, Nancy (2005) `Transnationalizing the Public Sphere'; at: republicart.net/disc/publicum/fraser01_en.htm (accessed 10 June 2007).
13.
Friedland, Lewis, Thomas Hove and Hernando Rojas (2006) `The Networked Public Sphere', Javnost — The Public13(4): 5—26.
14.
Glasser, Thodore and Charles Salmon (eds) (1998) Public Opinion and the Communication of Consent. New York: Guilford Press.
15.
Habermas, Jürgen (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
16.
Habermas, Jürgen (1987) The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 2. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
17.
Habermas, Jürgen (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
Habermas, Jürgen (2006) `Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research', Communication Theory16(4): 411—26.
19.
Hallin, Daniel and Paolo Mancini ( 2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics . New York: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Heikkilä, Heikki and Risto Kunelius (2006) `Journalists Imagining the European Public Sphere: Professional Discourses about the EU News in Ten Countries', Javnost — The Public12(4): 63—80.
21.
Machill, Marcel (1998) `Euronews: The First European News Channel as a Case Study for Media Industry Development in Europe', Media, Culture and Society20(3): 427—50.
22.
Mouffe, Chantal (1999) `Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism? ', Social Research66(3): 745—58.
23.
Rayemaeckers, Karin and Peter Golding (2007) `News Agenda Analysis of EU-Related News: A Comparative Research Programme for Ten European Countries', pp. 9—22 in AIM Research Consortium (eds) Comparing the Logic of EU Reporting from Brussels: Transnational Analysis of EU Media Coverage and of Interviews in Editorial O fices in Europe. Bochum and Freiburg: Projekt.
24.
Ruß-Mohl, Stephan (2003) `Towards a European Journalism? Limits, Opportunities, Challenges', Studies in CommunicationSciences3(2): 203—16.
Schlesinger, Philip (1997) `From Cultural Defence to Political Culture: Media, Politics and Collective Identity in the European Union', Media, Culture and Society19(3): 369—91.
27.
Schlesinger, Philip (1999) `Changing Spaces of Political Communication: The Case of the European Union', Political Communication16(3): 263—79.
28.
Schlesinger, Philip and John Erik Fossum (eds) (2007) The European Union and the Public Sphere: A Communicative Space in the Making? London and New York: Routledge.
29.
Schudson, Michael (1992) `Was There Ever a Public Sphere? If So, When? Reflections on the American Case', pp. 143—63 in C. Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
Splichal, Slavko (ed.) (2001) Public Opinion and Democracy: Vox Populi — Vox Dei?Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
31.
Splichal, Slavko (2006) `In Search of a Strong European Public Sphere: Some Critical Observations on Conceptualizations of Publicness and the (European) Public Sphere', Media, Culture and Society28(5): 695—714.
32.
Taylor, Charles (2004) Modern Social Imaginaries. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
33.
Wickham, James (2004) `Something New in Old Europe? Innovations in EU-Funded Social Research', Innovation: European Journal of Social Science Research17(3): 187—204.
