Right-wing populist parties are highly successful in online communication and have made electoral gains in a wide range of European countries. In the European Parliament, until the recent European elections in 2024, the majority of them were distributed between the two party alliances and parliamentary groups Identity and Democracy (ID) and European Conservatives and Reformists (ECR). To analyse their communicative strategies, we collected all Facebook posts of the party and parliamentary group accounts of ID and ECR (N = 616) within one year (08/21–08/22). Subsequently, structural topic modelling (STM), sentiment analysis and manual content analysis were applied to determine their communication strategies. Overall, the results indicate that ECR and ID are communicating rather moderately online. However, while ECR differs significantly from its national member parties, ID seems to reproduce right-wing populist narratives. Overall, this paper argues for a stronger focus on European party alliances, not only national parties, when researching right-wing populist communication in the EU.
AalbergTEsserFReinemannC, et al. (2017) Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York and London: Routledge.
2.
AhrensPKantolaJ (2022) Negotiating power and democracy in political group formation in the European Parliament. In: AhrensPElomäkiAKantolaJ (eds) European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94012-6_2.
3.
Alonso-MuñozLCasero-RipollésA (2020) Populism against Europe in social media: the Eurosceptic discourse on Twitter in Spain, Italy, France, and United Kingdom during the campaign of the 2019 European Parliament election. Frontiers in Communication5: 1–12.
4.
Alonso-MuñozLCasero-RipollésA (2023) The appeal to emotions in the discourse of populist political actors from Spain, Italy, France and the United Kingdom on Twitter. Frontiers in Communication8: 1–10.
5.
BertiCLonerE (2021) The 2019 European elections on Twitter between populism, Euroscepticism and nationalism: the case of Italy. SocietàMutamentoPolitica11(22): 275–288.
6.
BoulianneSKoc-MichalskaKBimberB (2020) Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers in Western democracies. New Media & Society22(4): 683–699.
7.
CaianiM (2018) Radical right cross-national links and international cooperation. In: RydgrenJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 394–411.
CarralUTuñónJElíasC (2023) Populism, cyberdemocracy and disinformation: analysis of the social media strategies of the French extreme right in the 2014 and 2019 European elections. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications10(23). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01507-2.
11.
CorbuNNegrea-BusuiocE (2020) Populism meets fake news: social media, stereotypes and emotions. In: KrämerBHoltz-BachaC (ed) Perspectives on Populism and the Media: Avenues for Research. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 181–200.
12.
CsehiRZgutE (2020) “We won’t let Brussels dictate us”: Eurosceptic populism in Hungary and Poland. European Politics and Society22(1): 53–68.
13.
Della PortaD (2022) Progressive social movements and the creation of European public spheres. Theory, Culture & Society39(4): 51–65.
14.
EatwellRGoodwinM (2018) National Populism: The Revolt Against Liberal Democracy. London: Pelican.
15.
EkmanM (2022) The great replacement: strategic mainstreaming of far-right conspiracy claims. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies28(4): 1127–1143.
16.
EllinasAA (2018) Media and the radical right. In: RydgrenJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 269–284.
17.
EngesserSErnstNEsserF, et al. (2017a) Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society20(8): 1109–1126.
18.
EngesserSFawziNLarssonAO (2017b) Populist online communication: introduction to the special issue. Information, Communication & Society20(9): 1279–1292.
19.
ErnstNBlassnigSEngesserS, et al. (2019) Populists prefer social media over talk shows: an analysis of populist messages and stylistic elements across six countries. Social Media + Society5(1): 1–14.
20.
FlewTIosifidisP (2020) Populism, globalisation and social media. International Communication Gazette82(1): 7–25.
21.
Gil de ZúñigaHMichalskaKKRömmeleA (2020) Populism in the era of Twitter: how social media contextualized new insights into an old phenomenon. New Media & Society22(4): 585–594.
22.
GründlJ (2022) Populist ideas on social media: a dictionary-based measurement of populist communication. New Media & Society24(6): 1481–1499.
23.
HabermasJ (2022) Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture & Society39(4): 145–171.
24.
HameleersMSchmuckDBosL, et al. (2021) Interacting with the ordinary people: how populist messages and styles communicated by politicians trigger users’ behaviour on social media in a comparative context. European Journal of Communication36(3): 238–253.
25.
HaßlerJMaginMRussmannU, et al. (2020) Reaching out to the Europeans: political parties’ Facebook strategies of issue ownership and the second-order character of European election campaigns. In: Holtz-BachaC (ed) Europawahlkampf 2019: Zur Rolle der Medien. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 87–113.
26.
HeftAPfetschBVoskresenskiiV, et al. (2023) Transnational issue agendas of the radical right? Parties’ Facebook campaign communication in six countries during the 2019 European Parliament election. European Journal of Communication38(1): 22–42.
27.
JagersJWalgraveS (2007) Populism as political communication style: an empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium.European Journal of Political Research46(3): 319–345.
KantolaJElomäkiAAhrensP (2022) Introduction: European Parliament’s political groups in turbulent times. In: AhrensPElomäkiAKantolaJ (ed) European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94012-6_1.
30.
KlingerUKoc-MichalskaKRussmannU (2023) Are campaigns getting uglier, and who is to blame? Negativity, dramatization and populism on Facebook in the 2014 and 2019 EP election campaigns. Political Communication40(3): 263–282.
31.
KuyperJMoffittB (2020) Transnational populism, democracy, and representation: pitfalls and potentialities. Global Justice: Theory Practice Rhetoric12(2): 27–49.
32.
LeruthB (2017) Transnational and pan-European Euroscepticism: the case of the European conservatives and reformists. In: LeruthBStartinNUsherwoodS (ed) The Routledge Handbook of Euroscepticism. London: Routledge, 384–396.
33.
MaierDWaldherrAMiltnerP, et al. (2018) Applying LDA topic modeling in communication research: toward a valid and reliable methodology. Communication Methods and Measures12(2-3): 93–118.
34.
McDonnellDWernerA (2019) International Populism: The Radical Right in the European Parliament. London: Hurst Publishers.
35.
MimnoDWallachHMTalleyE, et al. (2011) Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 262–272.
36.
MoffittB (2016) The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804799331.
37.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
MuddeC (2019) The Far Right Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
40.
MuddeCRovira KaltwasserC (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
41.
NielsenFÅ (2011) A new ANEW: evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs. In: Proceedings of the ESWC2011 workshop on ‘making sense of Microposts’: big things come in small packages, 93–98. http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.2903.
42.
NorrisPInglehartR (2019) Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PfetschBBenertVHeftA (2023) Same, same but different? Explaining issue agendas of right-wing parties’ Facebook campaigns to the 2019 EP election. Party Politics: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231184624.
45.
PostillJ (2018) Populism and social media: a global perspective. Media, Culture & Society40(5): 754–765.
46.
PuschmannCAusserhoferJŠlerkaJ (2020) Converging on a nativist core? Comparing issues on the Facebook pages of the Pegida movement and the alternative for Germany. European Journal of Communication35(3): 230–248.
47.
Ripoll ServentA (2022) When words do not follow deeds: an analysis of party competition between centre-right and Eurosceptic radical-right parties in the European Parliament. In: AhrensPElomäkiAKantolaJ (eds) European Parliament’s Political Groups in Turbulent Times. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 123–146. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-94012-6_6.
48.
Rivas-de-RocaRPérez-CurielCGarcía-GordilloM (2022) Building extreme right discourses on Twitter for non-campaign periods: insights from populist leaders across Europe. Observatorio (OBS*)16(4): 23–41.
49.
RobertsMEStewartBMTingleyD (2019) Stm: an R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software91(2): 1–40.
50.
RodrikD (2021) Why does globalization fuel populism? Economics, culture, and the rise of right-wing populism. Annual Review of Economics13: 133–170.
51.
RydgrenJ (2005) Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research44(3): 413–437.
52.
RydgrenJ (2018) The radical right: an introduction. In: RydgrenJ (ed) The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. New York: Oxford University Press, 1–13.
