This article demonstrates how social factors affect industrial organization by a comparative case study of South Korea and Taiwan. By applying the social networks analysis to the transaction costs measurement, the author argues that the mutual reinforcement between social network and business network has nourished the development of the industrial organizational structure of the two economies. The characteristics of social networks, on the one hand, determine the costs of information and communication, and, on the other hand, control the costs and benefits of force and fraud. Thus the transaction costs vary in different societies. Since trust and reputation can provide valuable services for each transaction, the behaviour of firms is regulated not only by law and morals, but more effectively by the economic incentives derived from social networks.
Amsden, A.H. (1985) `The State and Taiwan's Economic Development', in P. B. Evans, D. Rueshemeyer and T. Skocpol (eds) Bringing the State Back In, pp. 78—106. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
2.
Amsden, A.H. (1989) Asia's Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization . New York: Oxford University Press .
3.
Becker, G.S. (1964) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Biggart, N.W. (1991) `Explaining Asian Economic Organization: Toward a Weberian Institutional Perspective', Theory and Society20: 199—232.
5.
Castilla, E.J., Hwang H., Granovetter E. and Granovetter M. (2000) `Social Networks in Silicon Valley', in C.-M. Lee, W. F. Miller , M. G. Hancock and H. S. Rowen (eds) The Silicon Valley Edge , pp. 218—47. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6.
Chandler, A.D. (1977) The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
Chandler, A.D. and Daems, H. (1979) `Administrative Coordination, Allocation and Monitoring: Concepts and Comparison', in N. Horn and J. Kocka (eds) Law and the Formation of the Big Enterprises in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries, pp. 28—54. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
8.
Coase, R.H. (1992) `The Institutional Structure of Production', American Economic Review82: 713—19.
9.
Cumings, B. (1984) `The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy', International Organization38: 1—40.
10.
Degenne, A. and Forse, M. (1999) Introducing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks, CA and London: Sage.
11.
Deyo, F.C. (1987) The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism . Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
12.
Evans, P.B. (1995) Embedded Autonomy: State and Industrial Transformation . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
Feenstra, R.C., Yang, T.H. and Hamilton, G.G. (1999a) `Business Groups and Product Variety in Trade: Evidence from South Korea and Taiwan', Journal of International Economics48: 71—100.
14.
Feenstra, R.C., Madani, D., Yang, T.-H. and Liang, C.-Y. (1999b) `Testing Endogenous Growth in South Korea and Taiwan', Journal of Development Economics60: 317—41.
15.
Feenstra, R.C., Huang, D.S. and Hamilton, G.G. (2003) `A Market-Powered Based Model of Business Groups ', Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization51: 459—85.
16.
Gold, T.B. (1986) State and Society in the Taiwan Miracle. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
17.
Granovetter, M. (1985) `Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness', American Journal of Sociology91(3): 481—510.
18.
Granovetter, M. (1993) `The Nature of Economic Relationship', in R. Swedberg (ed.) Explorations in Economic Sociology, pp. 3—41. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
Granovetter, M. (1994) `Business Groups', in N. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds) Handbook of Economic Sociology, pp. 453—75. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20.
Granovetter, M. (2005) `The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes' , Journal of Economic Perspectives19(1): 33—50.
21.
Haggard, S. (1990) Pathways from the Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
Hamilton, G.G. (1989) `Patterns of Asian Capitalism: The Case of Taiwan and South Korea', Program in East Asian Culture and Development Research Working Paper Series No. 28, Institute of Government Affairs, University of California, Davis .
23.
Hamilton, G.G. (1996) Asian Business Networks. Berlin : Walter de Gruyter.
24.
Hamilton, G.G. (1998) `Culture and Organization in Taiwan's Market Economy ', in R. Hefner (ed.) Market Cultures: Society and Morality in the New Asian Capitalisms, pp. 41—77. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25.
Hamilton, G.G. and Feenstra, R.C. (1998) `The Organization of Economies', in M. C. Brinton and V. Nee (ed.) The New Institutionalism in Sociology, pp. 153—80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
Hamilton, G.G., Zeile, W. and Kim, W.-J. (1990) `The Network Structures of East Asian Economies' , in S. R. Clegg and S. G. Redding (eds) Capitalism in Contrasting Cultures, pp. 105—29. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
27.
Hamilton, G.G., Feenstra, R.C., Choe, W., Kim, C.K. and Lim, E.M. (2000) `Neither States Nor Markets: The Role of Economic Organization in Asian Development', International Sociology15(2): 288—305.
28.
Henderson, G. (1968) Korea: The Politics of the Vortex. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29.
Johnson, C. (1982) `Political Institutions and Economic Performance: The Government—Business Relationship in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan' , in F. C. Deyo (ed.) The Political Economy of the New Asian Industrialism, pp. 136—64. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30.
Levy, B. (1988) `Korean and Taiwanese Firms as International Competitors: The Challenges Ahead', Columbia Journal of World Business , Spring: 43—51.
31.
Levy, B. (1991) `Transaction Costs, the Size of Firms and Industrial Policy: Lessons from a Comparative Case Study of the Footwear Industry in Korea and Taiwan', Journal of Development Economics34: 151—78.
32.
Lim, H. ( 1998) Korea's Growth and Industrial Transformation. New York: St Martin's Press.
33.
Mody, A. (1990) `Institutions and Dynamic Comparative Advantage: The Electronics Industry in South Korea and Taiwan', Cambridge Journal of Economics14(3): 291—314.
34.
Orru, M., Biggart, N.W. and Hamilton, G.G. (1997) The Economic Organization of East Asian Capitalism . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Robinson, E.A.G. (1934) `The Problem of Management and the Size of Firms ', Economic Journal44 (June): 240—54.
36.
Samuelson, P. (1947) Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D. (1990) Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance . Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
38.
Solow, R.M. (1995) `Book review of Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity', The New Republic 11 September: 36—8.
39.
Stigler, G.J. (1951) `The Division of Labor is Limited by the Extent of the Market', Journal of Political Economy59 (June): 185—93.
40.
Wade, R. (1990) `Networks versus Markets in International Trade' , Journal of International Economics48(1): 7—37.
41.
Whitley, R. (1999) Divergent Capitalisms. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
42.
Williamson, O.E. (1975) Market and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
43.
Williamson, O.E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
44.
Wolf, M. (1983) The Japanese Conspiracy. New York: Empire.
45.
Woo, J.-E. (1991) Race to the Swift: State and Finance in Korean Industrialization. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
Yang, T.-H. (1993) `Industrial Structure and Trade Patterns: Evidence from South Korea and Taiwan', PhD dissertation, University of California, Davis.
47.
Zeile, W. (1991) `Industrial Policy and Organizational Efficiency: The Korean Chaebol Examined', in G. Hamilton (ed.) Business Network and Economic Development in East and Southeast Asia. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies.
