The targets culture in UK public services that emerged during the past two decades fell foul of Goodhart’s Law, which led to increases in complexity and bureaucracy to counteract the gaming of the system by frontline staff. The emergence of payment-by-results claims to avoid this pitfall, but in practice it is likely to be exactly the same. In fact, there are aspects of payment-by-results which are likely to skew public sector objectives even more thoroughly than targets.
BoyleD (2001) The Tyranny of Numbers. London: HarperCollins.
3.
BoyleD (forthcoming) The Human Element. Abingdon: Earthscan.
4.
Healthcare Commission (2009) Inquiry into the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust,summary report. London: Healthcare Commission.
5.
HoskinK (1996) The awful idea of accountability: Inscribing people into the measurement of objects. In: MunroRMourtisenJ (eds). Accountability: Power, Ethos and the Technologies of Managing. London: Thomson International Business Press,265–282.
6.
LingayahS (2001) Communities Count: The Litmus Test. London: New Economics Foundation.
7.
PowerM (1994) The Audit Explosion. London: Demos.
8.
SeddonJ (2007) System Thinking in the Public Sector. Axminster: Triarchy Press.
9.
SturgessGLCummingLM (2010) Payment by Outcome: A Commissioner’s Toolkit. London: 2020 Public Service Trust.