High growth firms play a disproportionate role in contributing to the economic vitality of regional economies. These are precisely the types of businesses that policy makers need to support in order to generate economic growth. Despite this, the article argues that current regional industrial and enterprise promotion policies in the UK are poorly equipped to help firms grow rapidly. This argument is developed by means of a critical examination of innovation support policies in Scotland. Indeed, many governments use such policies as a surrogate form of high growth firm policy. The article discusses the underlying principles and types of support which are needed to help foster and support rapidly growing firms. It argues that effective policy needs to be targeted, selective and customized to the specialist needs of high growth firms. The implementation of these types of policies is best delivered at a sub-national or regional level.
AntoncicBHisrichR (2001) Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing16(5): 495–527.
3.
Anyadike-DanesMBonnerKHartMMasonC (2009) Mapping Firm Growth in theUK: Identification of High Growth Firms and their Economic Impact. London: NESTA. Available at: http://www.erini.ac.uk/Publications/PDF/ERINIMon44.pdf.
4.
AudretschDFeldmanM (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review86(3): 630–640.
5.
AudretschDGriloIThurikR (2007) Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
6.
AutioEKronlundMKovalainenA (2007) High-Growth SME Support Initiatives in Nine Countries: Analysis, Categorization, and Recommendations. Helsinki: Ministry of Trade and Industry.
7.
BachtlerJBrownR (2004) Innovation and Regional Development: Transitions Toward a Knowledge-Based Economy. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
8.
BaileyDCowlingK (2006) Industrial policy and vulnerable capitalism. International Review of Applied Economics20(5): 537–553.
9.
BeathJ (2002) UK industrial policy: Old tunes on new instruments?. Oxford Review of Economic Policy18(2): 221–239.
10.
BentleyGBaileyDShuttJ (2010) From RDAs to LEPs: A new localism? Case Examples of West Midlands and Yorkshire. Local Economy25(7): 535–557.
11.
BERR (2008) High Growth Firms in the UK: Lessons from an Analysis of Comparative UK Performance. BERR Economics Paper No.3. London: Department for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform. Available at: http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file49042.pdf.
12.
BhideA (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
BirchK (2011) Weakness as strength in the Scottish life sciences: Institutional embedding of knowledge-based commodity chains in a less-favoured region. Growth and Change42(1): 71–96.
BrownR (2011) The determinants of high growth entrepreneurship in the Scottish food and drink cluster. In: AlsosGCarterSLjunggrenEWelterF (eds) The Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Agriculture and Rural Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 131–146.
ChangHJ (2002) Breaking the mould: An institutional political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state. Cambridge Journal of Economics26(5): 539–559.
21.
ChangHJ (2010) 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism. London: Allen Lane.
22.
CharlesD (2001) Universities and territorial development: Reshaping the regional role of UK universities. Local Economy18(1): 7–20.
23.
ChesbroughH (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
24.
CohenWLevithalD (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly35(1): 128–152.
25.
CowlingKSugdenR (1993) Industrial strategy: A missing link in British economic policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy9(3): 83–100.
26.
DavenportS (2009) Where Does International Entrepreneurship End? Exploring Entrepreneurial Exit from International SMEs through Trade Sales. Victoria Management School Working Paper 09-01. Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington.
27.
FischerEReuberR (2003) Support for rapid-growth firms: A comparison of the views of founders, government policymakers, and private sector resource providers. Journal of Small Business Management41(4): 346–365.
28.
FreelM (1998) Policy, prediction and growth: Picking start-up winners?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development5(1): 19–32.
29.
GarnseyEStamEHeffernanP (2006) New firm growth: Exploring processes and pathways. Industry and Innovation13(1): 1–20.
30.
GertlerM (2010) Rules of the game: The place of institutions in regional economic change. Regional Studies44(1): 1–15.
HansenBHamiltonR (2011) Factors distinguishing small firms growers and non-growers. International Small Business Journal29(3): 278–294.
33.
HarrisonRLeitchC (2010) Voodoo institutions or entrepreneurial university? Spin-off companies, the entrepreneurial system and regional development in the UK. Regional Studies44(9): 1241–1262.
34.
HenreksonMJohanssonD (2010) Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics35(2): 227–244.
35.
HugginsRWilliamsN (2009) Enterprise andpublic policy: A review of Labour Government intervention in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy27(1): 19–41.
36.
HuttonWSchneiderP (2008) The Failure of Market Failure: Towards a 21st Century Keynesianism. London: NESTA.
37.
KayJ (2009) Innovation is not about wearing a white coat. Financial Times, 16 December, p. 17.
38.
LeeS (2010) Necessity as the mother of intervention: The industrial policy debate in England. Local Economy25(8): 622–530.
39.
LeeSMcBrideS (2007) Introduction: Neo-liberalism, state power and global governance in the twenty-first century. In: LeeSMcBrideS (eds) Neo-Liberalism, State Power and Global Governance. Dordrecht: Springer, 1–24.
40.
LernerJ (2010) The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital. Small Business Economics35(3): 255–264.
41.
LevyCLeeNPeateA (2011) Ready, Steady, Grow? How the Government Can Support the Development of more High Growth Firms. A joint Cities 2020 and Knowledge Economy Programme Report. London: Work Foundation.
42.
MartinRSunleyP (2003) Deconstructing clusters: Chaotic concept or policy panacea. Journal of Economic Geography3(1): 5–35.
MasonCBrownR (2011a) Creating good public policy to support high growth firms. Small Business Economicsdoi: 10.1007/s1118701193699.
45.
MasonCBrownR (2011b) Business models and competitive advantage. In: JollyA (ed.) The IoD Growing Business Handbook. London: Kogan Page, 3–8.
46.
MasonCHarrisonR (2006) After the exit: Acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies40(1): 55–73.
47.
MasonGBishopKRobinsonC (2009) Business Growth and Innovation: The Wider Impact of Rapidly Growing Firms in UK City-Regions. London: NESTA. Available at: http://www.niesr.ac.uk/pdf/190509_94959.pdf.
48.
MoleKHartMRoperSSaalD (2008) Differential gains from Business Link support and advice: A treatment effects approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy26(2): 315–334.
49.
MoleKHartMRoperSSaalD (2011) Broader or deeper? Exploring the most effective intervention profile for public small business support. Environment and Planning A43(1): 87–105.
50.
MooreG (1991) Crossing the Chasm: Marketing and Selling High Tech Products to Mainstream Customers. New York: Harper Business.
51.
MorrisonABreenJShameenA (2003) Small business growth: Intention, ability and opportunity. Journal of Small Business Management41(4): 417–425.
OakeyR (2003) Technical entrepreneurship in high technology small firms: Some observations on the implications for management. Technovation23(8): 679–688.
55.
OECD (2008) Measuring Entrepreneurship: A Digest of Indicators. OECD-Eurostat Entrepreneurship Indicators Program. Paris: OECD.
56.
OECD (2010) High-Growth Enterprises: What Governments Can do to Make a Difference. OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.
PattonDMarlowSRamMSangheraK (2003) Interpretive analysis as an evaluative tool: The case of Mustard.UK.Com, a high-growth small business programme. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy21(6): 813–824.
59.
PikeATomaneyJ (2008) The state and uneven development: The governance of economic development in England in the post-devolution UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society2(1): 13–34.
60.
RialpARialpJKnightG (2005) The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: What do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry. International Business Review44(2): 147–166.
61.
RodrikD (2004) Industrial Policy for the Twenty-First Century. Vienna: UNIDO.
62.
RogersonRBoyleMMasonC (2006) Progress Report on the Fresh Talent Initiative. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive. Available at: www.scotland.gov.uk/socialresearch.
63.
RosaPScottM (1999) The prevalence of multiple owners and directors in the SME sector: Implications for our understanding of start-up and growth. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development11(1): 21–38.
64.
Scottish Enterprise (1993) Improving the Business Birth Rate: A Strategy for Scotland. Glasgow: Scottish Enterprise.
65.
Scottish Enterprise (2008) The Risk Capital Market in Scotland 2008. Glasgow: Scottish Enterprise.
ShaneS (2009) Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics33(2): 141–149.
70.
StoreyDJ (1992) Should we Abandon Support for To Start-Up Businesses?. Working Paper 11, CSME: University of Warwick.
71.
StoreyDJ (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector. London: Routledge.
72.
Targeting Innovation (2008) Scottish University Spin-Off Study. Glasgow: Targeting Innovation.
73.
VerheulIMilL (2008) What Determines the Growth Ambitions of Dutch Early-Stage Entrepreneurs. Working Paper H 200811. Zoetermer: Scientific Analysis of Entrepreneurship and SMEs.
