We explore how firm size and local ownership influence employees’ organizational commitment. Using a civic community perspective, we hypothesize that small and locally owned businesses engender more employee loyalty in a representative national sample of workers. That hypothesis is supported for all workers and is most clearly evident in a subsample of rural workers. Our results show that working at small businesses and locally owned businesses significantly increases an employee’s organizational commitment. Furthermore, individuals who work at small businesses that are also locally owned are found to have the highest level of organizational commitment. Our study provides insight into how structural elements of an organization, such as small businesses and locally owned businesses, are associated with an improved quality of life and a more robust civil society. Moreover, this paper highlights the need for further research on how structural attributes of businesses affect the attitudes and opinions of workers.
AllenNJMeyerJP (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology63(1): 1–18.
2.
AmatoLHAmatoCH (2007) The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics72(3): 229–241.
3.
BaderCDFroesePMenckenFC (2007) American piety 2005: Content, methods and selected results from the Baylor religion survey. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion46(4): 447–463.
4.
BainC (2011) Local ownership of ethanol plants: What are the effects on communities?Biomass & Bioenergy35(4): 1400–1407.
5.
BartlettKR (2001) The relationship between training and organizational commitment: A study in the health care field. Human Resource Development Quarterly12(4): 335–352.
6.
BergerPLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
7.
BlanchardTMatthewsTL (2006) The configuration of local economic power and civic participation in the global economy. Social Forces84(4): 2241–2257.
8.
BlanchardTTolbertCMenckenFC (2012) The health and wealth of U.S. counties: How the small business environment impacts alternative measures of development. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society5(1): 149–162.
9.
BlauGJ (1986) Job involvement and organizational commitment as interactive predictors of tardiness and absenteeism. Journal of Management12(4): 577–584.
10.
BlauG (1988) An investigation of the apprenticeship organizational socialization strategy. Journal of Vocational Behavior32(2): 176–195.
11.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12.
BuchananBII (1974) Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly19(4): 533–546.
13.
BravermanH (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital, New York: Monthly Review Press.
14.
ChungLHGibbonsPT (1997) Corporate entrepreneurship: The roles of ideology and social capital. Group and Organization Management22(1): 10–30.
15.
ColarelliSMDeanRAKonstansC (1987) Comparative effects of personal and situational influences on job outcomes of new professionals. Journal of Applied Psychology72(4): 558–566.
16.
ColemanJS (1974) Power and the Structure of Society, New York: Norton.
17.
DeCotiisTASummersTP (1987) A path analysis of a model of the antecedents and consequences of organizational commitment. Human Relations40(7): 445–470.
18.
DoneyPMCannonJPMullenMR (1998) Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. The Academy of Management Review23(3): 601–620.
19.
GoldschmidtW (1978) As You Sow: Three Studies in the Social Consequences of Agribusiness, Montclair, NJ: Allanheld, Osmun.
20.
HallKBPorterfieldGA (2001) Community by Design: New Urbanism for Suburbs and Small Communities, New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
HodsonRSullivanTA (1985) Totem or tyrant? Monopoly, regional, and local sector effects on worker commitment. Social Forces63: 716–731.
22.
HollisterMN (2004) Does firm size matter anymore? The new economy and firm size wage effects. American Sociological Review69: 659–676.
23.
IrwinMBlanchardTTolbertC (2004) Why people stay: The impact of community context on nonmigration in the USA. Population59(5): 567–592.
24.
IrwinMTolbertCMLysonTA (1999) There’s no place like home: Non-migration and civic engagement. Environment and Planning A31: 2223–2238.
25.
JoSJJooB-K (2011) Knowledge sharing: The influences of learning organization culture, organizational commitment, and organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies18(3): 353–364.
26.
KallebergALVan BurenME (1996) Is bigger better? Explaining the relationship between organization size and job rewards. American Sociological Review61(1): 47–66.
27.
KelmanHC (1958) Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. The Journal of Conflict Resolution2(1): 51–60.
28.
LeeMROuseyGC (2001) Size matters: Examining the link between small manufacturing, socioeconomic deprivation, and crime rates in nonmetropolitan communities. The Sociological Quarterly42(4): 581–602.
29.
LysonTTolbertCM (2004) Civil society, civic communities, and rural development. In: BrownDSwansonL (eds) Challenges for Rural America in the 21st Century, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 228–238.
30.
LysonTATorresRJWelshR (2001) Scale of agricultural production, civic engagement, and community welfare. Social Forces80(1): 311–327.
31.
MathieuJEZajacDM (1990) A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin108(2): 171–194.
32.
MarchJGSimonHA (1958) Organizations, New York: Wiley.
33.
MellowW (1982) Employer size and wages. The Review of Economics and Statistics64(3): 495–501.
34.
MenckenFCChristopherBPolsonEC (2006) Integrating civil society and economic growth in Appalachia. Growth and Change37(1): 107–127.
35.
MeyerJPAllenNJ (1984) Testing the ‘side-bet theory’ of organizational commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology69(3): 372–378.
36.
MeyerJPAllenNJ (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review1(1): 61–89.
37.
MeyerJPAllenNJGellatlyIR (1990) Affective and continuance commitment to the organization: Evaluation of measures and analysis of concurrent and time-lagged relations. Journal of Applied Psychology75(6): 710–720.
38.
Mills, CW and Ulmer M (1946) Small business and civic welfare. Report of the Smaller War Plants Corporation to the Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business. Document 135. U.S. Senate, 79th Congress, 2nd session, February 13. Government Printing Office.
39.
MitchellS (2007) Big-Box Swindle: The True Cost of Mega-Retailers and the Fight for America’s Independent Businesses, Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
40.
MowdayRTPorterLWSteersRM (1982) Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover, New York: Academic Press.
41.
MowdayRTSteersRMPorterLW (1979) The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior14(2): 224–247.
42.
NahapietJGhoshalS (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2): 242–266.
43.
NealAGriffinMAHartPM (2000) The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science34(1–3): 99–109.
44.
PierceJLDunhamRB (1987) Organizational commitment: Pre-employment propensity and initial work experiences. Journal of Management13(1): 163–178.
45.
PutnanR (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.
46.
ShyrockHSSiegelJS (1975) The Methods and Materials of Demography, Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
47.
TolbertCMIrwinMLysonT (2002) Civic community in small-town America: How civic welfare is influenced by local capitalism and civic engagement. Rural Sociology67: 90–113.
48.
TolbertCMLysonTAIrwinM (1998) Locality, civic engagement, and civic welfare. Social Forces77: 401–428.
49.
VroomVH (1964) Work and Motivation, New York: Wiley.
50.
WallaceJEKayFM (2009) Are small firms more beautiful or is bigger better? A study of compensating differentials and law firm internal labor markets. The Sociological Quarterly50(3): 474–496.
51.
WatsonGWPapamarcosSD (2002) Social capital and organizational commitment. Journal of Business and Psychology16(4): 537–552.
52.
WienerYVardiY (1980) Relationships between job, organization, and career commitments and work outcomes—An integrative approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance26(1): 81–96.
53.
WilliamsM (2001) In whom we trust: Group membership as an affective context for trust development. The Academy of Management Review26(3): 377–396.
54.
WhittingtonJGoodwinVMurrayB (2004) Transformational leadership, goal difficulty, and job design: Independent and interactive effects on employee outcomes. Leadership Quarterly15(5): 593–606.
55.
YoungFWLysonTA (1993) Branch plants and poverty in the American south. Sociological Forum8(3): 433–450.
56.
Yücelİ (2012) Examining the relationships among job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention: An empirical study. International Journal of Business & Management7(20): 44–58.
