These years, rural–urban business partnerships emerge in a new trans-territorial logic, surpassing normal trade alliances. Such partnerships embrace social issues, benefits related to place branding, knowledge dissemination, etc. This contribution scrutinizes 11 rural–urban business partnerships in Denmark within fields of food, film, green care, media, retail, teleworking, education, and tourism. The degree of structural and legal formalization varies, but in many cases the formalization is fairly low. Partnership transparency formats depend on interrelationships with volunteering communities. When analyzing resource composition of the rural–urban business partnerships it becomes clear that there are multi-faceted value flows consisting of products, production capacity, market access, knowledge, capital, waste products, and amenities. The creation of productive business partnerships often takes a long time, and they are matters of continual change. The successful examples transform positively the value chain and rearrange the nature and power of transactions in a territorial framework, and they accommodate for entrepreneurial forces in disadvantaged regions.
Åkerstrøm AndersenNÅ (2006) Partnerskabelse, Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
2.
AminS (2013) Food Movements Unite! Strategies to Transform Our Food System, Oakland: Food First Books.
3.
AndersenPBøllingtoftA (2011) Cluster-based global firms' use of local capabilities. Management Research Review34(10): 1087–1106.
4.
ArgarwalS (2012) Relational spatiality and resort restructuring. Annals of Tourism Research39(1): 134–154.
5.
ArtmannJHuttenloherCKawkaR (2012) Partnership for Sustainable Rural–urban Development: Existing Evidences, Berlin: Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Development.
6.
BergquistWBetweeJMeuelD (1995) Building Strategic Relationships, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BockB (2015) Social Innovation – A Solution for Marginalising Rural Areas?, Keynote at European Rural Sociology conference, Aberdeen.
BrinkerhoffDWBrinkerhoffJM (2011) Public–private partnerships: Perspectives on purposes, publicness, and good governance. Public Administration and Development31(1): 2–14.
10.
CaffynADahlströmM (2005) Urban–rural interdependencies: Joining up policy in practice. Regional Studies39(3): 283–296.
11.
ChampersR (1983) Rural Development. Putting the Last First, Abingdon: Routledge.
12.
ChertowMR (2007) “Uncovering” industrial symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology11(1): 11–30.
13.
ChristoffersenH (2003) Det danske bymønster og landdistrikterne, Copenhagen: AKF.
14.
Copenhagen Economics (2012) Bioøkonomiens potentiale og værdien for landdistrikterne, Copenhagen: Fødevareministeriet.
15.
CopusA (2013) Urban–rural relationships in the new century: Clarifying and updating the intervention logic. In: KolcynskiM (ed.) New Paradigm in Action, Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development, pp. 7–29.
16.
CoutardOFinnvedenGKabischS (2014) Urban Megatrends: Towards A European Research Agenda, Brussels: Urban Europe.
17.
DabsonBJensenJOkagakiA (2012) Case Studies of Wealth Creation and Rural–urban Linkages, Iowa City: RUPRI Rural Futures Lab.
18.
DelgadoMPorterMESternS (2014) Clusters, convergence, and economic performance. Research Policy43(10): 1785–1799.
19.
DuboisACopusAHedströmM (2012) Local embeddedness and global links in rural areas: Euclidean and relational space in business networks. In: HedbergDDo CarmoRM (eds) Translocal Ruralism, Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 103–121.
FonteM (2008) Knowledge, food and place. A way of producing, a way of knowing. Sociologia Ruralis48(3): 200–222.
22.
FranklinAMorganS (2014) Exploring the new rural–urban interface. In: MarsdenTMorleyA (eds) Sustainable Food Systems: Building a New Paradigm, Abingdon: Routledge.
23.
GoetzMZipfA (2013) The evolution of geo-crowdsourcing. In: SuiDElwoodSGoodchildM (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 139–159.
24.
GooginsBKRochlinSA (2000) Creating the partnership society: Understanding the rhetoric and reality of cross-sectoral partnerships. Business and Society Review105(1): 127–144.
25.
HallCMcVittieAMoranD (2004) What does the public want from agriculture and the countryside?Journal of Rural Studies20(2): 211–225.
26.
HarveyDCHawkinsHThomasNJ (2012) Thinking creative clusters beyond the city: People, places and networks. Geoforum43(3): 529–539.
27.
HealeyP (2006) Relational complexity and the imaginative power of strategic spatial planning. European Planning Studies14(4): 525–546.
28.
HedbergCdo CarmoRM (2012) Translocal ruralism: Mobility and connectivity in European rural spaces. In: HedbergDDo CarmoRM (eds) Translocal Ruralism, Amsterdam: Springer, pp. 1–9.
29.
HeleyJJonesL (2012) Relational rurals: Some thoughts on relating things and theory in rural studies. Journal of Rural Studies28(3): 208–217.
30.
Hemer J (2011) A Snapshot on Crowdfunding. Working paper firms and region R2/2011. Karlsruhe: Frauenhofer.
31.
HjalagerA-M (2013) Grønne virksomheder i landdistrikterne, Esbjerg: Center for Landdistriktsforskning.
HorlingsLGMarsdenTK (2014) Exploring the ‘new rural paradigm’ in Europe. European Urban and Regional Studies21(1): 4–20.
34.
HumphreyJSchmitzH (2002) How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?Regional Studies36(9): 1017–1027.
35.
HuxhamCVangenS (2005) Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage, London: Routledge.
36.
JamesGDavidJK (1999) Explaining interfirm cooperation and performance: Toward a reconciliation of predictions from the resource-based view and organizational economics. Strategic Management Journal20(9): 867–888.
37.
KarnøePGarudR (2012) Path creation: Co-creation of heterogeneous resources in the emergence of the Danish wind turbine cluster. European Planning Studies20(5): 733–752.
38.
KawkaR (2013) Rural–urban partnerships and rural development. In: KolcynskiM (ed.) New Paradigm in Action, Warsaw: Ministry of Regional Development, pp. 51–64.
39.
KlitgaardRTrevertonGF (2004) Assessing partnerships: New forms of collaboration. In: KamenskyJMBurlinTJ (eds) Collaboration: Using Networks and Partnerships, New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 21–60.
40.
LarsenJFH (2013) Danmarks landdistrikts-og yderkommuner – et erhvervsøkonomisk overblik, Esbjerg: Center for Landdistriktsforskning.
41.
LeighNGBlakelyEJ (2013) Planning Local Economic Development: Theory and Practice, London: Sage.
42.
MatthiesenU (2014) KnowledgeScapes. In: Peter MeusburgerPGlücklerJMeskiouiME (eds) Knowledge and the Economy, Knowledge and Space 5, Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 73–123.
43.
MettepenningenEVandermeulenVVan HuylenbroeckG (2012) Exploring synergies between place branding and agricultural landscape management as a rural development practice. Sociologia Ruralis52(4): 432–452.
44.
NeumeierS (2012) Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis52(1): 48–69.
45.
NielsenSPPHoffHChandlerTL (2013) Innovative velfærdsløsninger i landdistrikterne: En eksempelsamling, Esbjerg: Center for Landdistriktsforskning.
46.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2013) Rural–Urban partnerships: An integrated approach to economic development, Paris: OECD.
47.
PaquinRLBuschTTillemanSG (2015) Creating economic and environmental value through industrial symbiosis. Long Range Planning48(2): 95–107.
48.
PatoMLTeixeiraAA (2016) Twenty years of rural entrepreneurship: A bibliometric survey. Sociologia Ruralis56(1): 3–28.
49.
RauschAS (2009) Capitalizing on creativity in rural areas: National and local branding in Japan. Journal of Rural and Community Development4(2): 65–79.
50.
RoelandtTJden HertogP (1999) Cluster analysis and cluster-based policy making in OECD countries. In: OECD, Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach, Paris: OECD, pp. 9–23.
51.
RyserLHalsethG (2010) Rural economic development: A review of the literature from industrialized economies. Geography Compass4(6): 5100–5531.
52.
ScottM (2004) Building institutional capacity in rural Northern Ireland. Journal of Rural Studies20(1): 49–59.
53.
SeawrightJGerringJ (2008) Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly61(2): 294–308.
54.
ShucksmithM (2010) Disintegrated rural development? Neo-endogenous rural development, planning and place-shaping in diffused power contexts. Sociologia Ruralis50(1): 1–14.
55.
SteinA (2014) Rural strategies for coping with the spatial unevenness in the knowledge society. European Planning Studies22(10): 2116–2133.
56.
Sundbo J and Sørensen F (eds) (2013) Handbook on the Experience Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
57.
Tamásy C and Diez JR (eds) (2016) Regional Resilience, Economy and Society: Globalising Rural Places. Abingdon: Routledge.
58.
ThuesenAA (2011) Partnerships as associations: Input and output legitimacy of LEADER partnerships in Denmark, Finland and Sweden. European Planning Studies19(4): 575–594.
59.
WernerfeltB (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal5(2): 171–180.
60.
WestheadPWrightMUcbasaranD (2001) The internationalization of new and small firms: A resource-based view. Journal of Business Venturing16(4): 333–358.
61.
YoungN (2010) Business networks, collaboration and embeddedness in local and extra-local spaces. Sociologia Ruralis50(4): 392–408.
62.
ZasadaILoiblWBergesR (2013) Rural–urban regions: A spatial approach to define urban–rural relationships in Europe. In: NilssonKPauleitSBellS (eds) Peri-urban future, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, pp. 45–68.
63.
ZonneveldWSteadD (2007) European territorial cooperation and the concept of urban–rural relationships. Planning, Practice & Research22(3): 439–453.
