The debate about the impact of information and communication technology has tended to focus on either its economic or its political aspects. The growing centrality of this technology to life in the 21st century, however, raises important questions about social ownership and control that necessitate a broader and more holistic analysis. Central to this issue is the growing challenge posed by open-source software to the proprietary business model that has hitherto dominated the market. The author examines how these developments are being mediated in Britain through the intersection of government policy, private interests, and the institutional configuration of the state.
Aslett, M. (2006a, August 15). Atos Origin predicts open source software landscape. CBR. Available at http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=96BD2055-DC6E-4D49-B0CF-50C52AEFFD14
2.
Aslett, M. (2006b, November 24). OSC joins criticism of UK education's attitude to open source. CBR. Available at http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2006/11/osc_joins_criti.html
3.
Bacon, J. (2006, February 23). Bristol switches to StarOffice. linuxdevcenter.com. Available at http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2006/02/23/bristol_migration.html
4.
Beer, S. (2007, January 15). Vista, Office 2007 get thumbs down from UK schools tech advisor. iTWire. Available at http://www.itwire.com/content/view/8586/53/
5.
Bennett, M. (2007, February 27). UK government ignores open-source potential. IT Week. Available at http://www.itweek.co.uk/itweek/news/2184306/uk-government-ignores-open
6.
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. (2005). Open source software in schools: A study of the spectrum of use and related ICT infrastructure costs. Coventry, UK: Author.
7.
Broersma, M. (2003, June 27). UK is an open-source "third world country."ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,2136707,00.htm
8.
Broersma, M. (2006, November 30). Birmingham City Council claims open-source success. Techworld. Available at http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?newsid=7459
9.
Cabinet Office. (2005, March). Connecting the UK: The digital strategy. Available at http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file13434.pdf
10.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersal and deliberation. Political Communication, 22, 147-162.
11.
Dalle, J.-M., David, P.A., Ghosh, R.A., & Steinmueller, W.E. (2004). Advancing economic research on the free and open source software mode of production (Discussion Paper 04-03). Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
12.
Dedrick, J., & West, J. (2003). Why firms adopt open source platforms: A grounded theory of innovation and standards adoption. Available at http://www.si.umich.edu/misq-stds/proceedings/145_236-257.pdf
13.
Donoghue, A. (2007, January 29). Greens: Vista means more dead PCs . ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/0,1000000091,39285679,00.htm
14.
European Commission. (2000). An information society for all- Action plan. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
15.
European Commission. (2005). e-Government in the member states of the EuropeanUnion . Available at http://europa.eu.int/idabc/egovo
16.
Evers, L. (2001, October 18). Microsoft faces pricing enquiry. Network IT Week. Available at http://www.infomaticsonline.co.uk/networkitweek/features/2059474/microsoft-faces-pricing-enquiry
17.
Ghosh, P. (2006, November 26). Computer industry "faces crisis."BBC News. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/6155998.stm
18.
Ghosh, R.A. (2006, November 20). Study on the economic impact of open source software on innovation and the competitiveness of information and communication technologies (ICT) sector in the EU: Final report. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/ict/policy/doc/2006-11-20-flossimpact.pdf
19.
Gibson, R.K., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2005). Online participation in the UK: Testing a "contextualised" model of Internet effects. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7, 561-583.
20.
Hamm, S. (2005, January 31). Linux IncBusinessWeek . Available at http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_05/b3918001_mz001.htm
21.
iMPOWER. (2006). Opening the door to open source? Birmingham City Council's experience with open source. London: Author .
22.
Intellect. (2006). Navigating the new economy: Defining and measuring progress towards the UK knowledge economy. Available at http://www.intellectuk.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,632
23.
Islam, F. (2003, December 7). NHS may ditch Microsoft on costs. The Observer. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2003/dec/07/microsoft.business
24.
Kawamoto, D. (2007, September 17). European Union court rejects Microsoft's appeal in historic case. CNet News. Available at http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9779499-7.html
25.
Kay, J. (2001). What became of the new economy?National Institute Economic Review, 177, 56-69.
26.
Kirk, J. (2007, February 26). U.K. launches open-source policy group: The National Open Center will be the U.K.'s first organization dedicated to studying open-source software issues. InfoWorld. Available at http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/02/26/HNukopensourcegroup_1.html
27.
Kuchinskas, S. (2004, August 18). How Redmond won Newham: Microsoft is wheeling and dealing to lock in government customers. InternetNews.com. Available at http://www.internet-news.com/bus-news/article.php/3397021/+How+Redmond+Won+Newham.htm
28.
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. (2004). The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond (Working Paper 10956). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
29.
Lettice, J. (2003, October 9). UK gov aims for "level playing field" with open source pilots. The Register. Available at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/10/09/uk_gov_aims_for_level/
30.
Liagouras, G. (2005). The political economy of post-industrial capitalism . Theses Eleven, 81, 20-35.
31.
Linux "better than proprietary software." ( 2004, December 14). ZDNet.co.uk Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39181043,00.htm
32.
Linux share grows in UK SME sector. (2003, December 12). The Register. Available at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2003/12/12/linux_share_grows_in_uk/
33.
Litan, R.E., & Rivlin, A.M. (2001). Projecting the economic impact of the Internet . American Economic Review, 91(2), 313-317.
34.
Lomas, N. (2006, December 6). Vista: Companies slow on the uptake-Poll . silicon.com. Available at http://software.silicon.com/os/0,39024651,39164563,00.htm?r=1
35.
Lynch, I. (2006a). Becta denies open source school barriers. CBR. Available at http://www.businessreviewonline.com/os/archives/2006/11/becta_denies_op.html
36.
Lynch, I. (2006b). The relationship between open source software and government policy: Understanding commercial models and issues of sustainability for open source development in education. Available at http://www.opensourceacademy.org.uk/news_and_events/press_releases/article/government-policy-and-open-source-software-18606.pdf .
37.
Margetts, H. (2006). E-government in Britain-A decade on. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(2), 250-265.
38.
Mathieson, S.A. (2005, May 9). Local authorities turn away from Microsoft . The Guardian. Available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2005/may/09/epublic.microsoft
39.
McCue, A. (2004, January 6). London council ditches Linux plans . ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39118909,00.htm
40.
McCue, A. (2005, December 5). NHS takes the open source pill. ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39240192,00.htm
41.
Meng, T.T. (2003, August 14). The case for open source: OSS vs proprietary software. Available at http://pascal.case.unibz.it/retrieve/3355/tan_tze_meng.pdf
42.
Modernising government (Cm 4310). (1999, March). Available at http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm43/4310/4310.htm
43.
Office for National Statistics. (2006a). Information and communication technology (ICT): Activity of UK businesses . Newport, UK: Author.
44.
Office for National Statistics. (2006b). Internet access: Households and individuals. Newport, UK : Author.
45.
Office of Communications. (2006). The international communications market 2006. London: Author.
46.
Office of the e-Envoy. (2001). OSS: Use within UK government. London: Author.
47.
Office of Government Commerce. (2002). Open source software: Use within UK government. London : Author.
48.
Office of Government Commerce. (2004). Open source software trials in government. London : Author.
49.
Office of Telecommunications & Office of Fair Trading. (2000). Competition and e-commerce: A joint OFTEL and OFT study. Available at http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/Oftel/publications/research/ecom0400.htm
50.
Osborne, G. (2007, March 8). Recasting the political settlement for the digital age. Speech at the Royal Society for the Arts . Available at http://www.conservatives.com/tile.do?def=news.story.page&obj_id=135408
51.
Oss Watch. (2006). Survey of UK higher education and further education institutions. Oxford, UK: Author .
52.
Outrage at Gates' knighthood. (2005, March 2). ZDNet.co.uk Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,1000000073,39189895,00.htm
53.
Peeling, N., & Satchell, J. (2001). Analysis of the impact of open source software . Available at http://www.govtalk.gov.uk/documents/QinetiQ_OSS_rep.pdf
54.
Performance and Innovation Unit. (2000). e-gov: Electronic government services for the 21st century. London: Author.
55.
Petreley, N. (2004, October 22). Security report: Windows vs Linux . The Register. Available at http://www.theregister.co.uk/security/security_report_windows_vs_linux/
56.
Richardson, T. (2001, November 21). UK govt silent on portal plans. The Register. Available at http://www.theregister.co.uk/2001/11/21/uk_govt_silent_on_portal/
57.
Schools warned off Microsoft deal. (2007, October 26). BBC News. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/7063716.stm
58.
Story, L., & Pfanner, E. (2006, December 4). The future of Web ads is in Britain . The New York Times.
59.
Thurston, R. (2006a, November 13). Large public-sector Linux project flops. ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39284683,00.htm
60.
Thurston, R. (2006b, November 27). MPs: Open source faces exclusion in schools. ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39284874,00.htm
61.
Thurston, R. (2007a, March 5). Birmingham considers Linux extension . ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39286157,00.htm
62.
Thurston, R. (2007b, March 16). Top five PC manufacturers fail naked PC test. ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/hardware/0,1000000091,39286228,00.htm
63.
Tickbox.net. (2006). Tickbox.net survey: DirectGov-Internet thinking. Available at http://archive.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/e-government/docs/direct_gov/final_tickbox_report.pdf
64.
Tolbert, C.J., & McNeal, R.S. (2003). Unravelling the effects of the Internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175-185.
65.
UK government funds another new open-source programme. (2005, April 7). Techworld. Available at http://www.techworld.com/opsys/news/index.cfm?newsid=3443
66.
Vassou, A.-M. (2006, December 22). Open source to be a driving force in education. Computeract!ve. Available at http://www.computeractive.co.uk/computeractive/news/2171542/education-driving-force-behind
67.
Ward, S., Gibson, R., & Lusoli, W. (2003). Online participation and mobilisation in Britain: Hype, hope and reality. Parliamentary Affairs, 56(4), 652-668.
68.
Wearden, G. (2004, August 16). Newham Council denies playing dirty with Linux. ZDNet.co.uk. Available at http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39163655,00.htm
69.
Weare, C. (2002). The Internet and democracy: The causal links between technology and politics. International Journal of Public Administration , 25(5), 659-691.
