Considering the relationship between human autonomy, law and technology has deep origins. Both technology studies and legal theory tell origin stories about human autonomy as the prize from either a foundational technological or jurisprudential event. In these narratives either law is considered a second order consequence of technology or technology is revealed as a second order consequence of law. In the alternative what is suggested is a foundation story drawing upon human autonomy as human responsibility for law and technology and for the stories told about them.
Bennett Moses, L. ( 2007). Recurring dilemmas: The law’s race to keep up with technological change. University of Illinois Journal of Law, Technology and Policy, 7, 239-285.
2.
Castronova, E. ( 2006). Synthetic worlds: The business and culture of online games. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
3.
Foucault, M. ( 1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A. M. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Routledge.
4.
Foucault, M. ( 1977). Discipline and punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.
5.
Fox, W. ( 1990). Towards a transpersonal ecology: Developing new foundations for environmentalism. Boston: Shambhala .
6.
Fukuyama, F. ( 2002). Our posthuman future: Consequences of the biotechnological revolution. New York: Farrah, Straus & Giroux.
7.
Hobbes, T. ( 2008). Leviathan. New York: Pearson Longman.
8.
Kalman, L. ( 1986). Legal realism at Yale. Chapel Hill : University of North Carolina Press.
9.
Kirby, M. ( 1982). The law and modern technology. Waurn Ponds, Australia: Deakin University Press.
10.
Lastowka, F.G. ( 2008). User-generated content in virtual worlds. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, 10(4), 893-917.
11.
Mumford, L. ( 1966). The myth of the machine: Technics and human development . New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich .
12.
Plato. (1976). Protagoras (C. C. W. Taylor, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
Stiegler, B. ( 1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus (R. Beardsworth , Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14.
Tranter, K. ( 2002). Terror in the texts: Technology-law-future. Law and Critique, 13(1), 75-99.
15.
Tranter, K. ( 2003). Mad Max: The car and Australian governance. National Identities, 5(1), 67-81.
16.
Tranter, K. ( 2007). "Frakking toasters" and jurisprudences of technology: The exception, the subject and techné in Battlestar Galactica. Law and Literature, 19(1), 45-75.
17.
Tranter, K., & Statham, B. ( 2007). Echo and mirror: Clone hysteria, genetic determinism and Star Trek nemesis. Law, Culture and the Humanities, 3(3), 361-380.
18.
Tribe, L. ( 1973). Channeling technology through law. Chicago: Bracton Press.
19.
Weber, M. ( 1968). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 2). Berkeley: University of California Press.
