Accessibility of early intervention program literature was examined through readability analysis of documents given to families who have a child served by the Birth to 3 program. Nine agencies that serve families in Birth to 3 programs located in a county in the Midwest provided the (n = 94) documents. Documents were included in the analysis if they conveyed information about the nature of the program, the financial obligations of the family, intervention planning, and programmatic consent. The analysis indicated that a majority of the documents were written above the recommended fifth-grade reading level. Action steps to improve the accessibility of early intervention documents are discussed.
Amini, H., Casamassim, P., Lin, H., & Hayes, J. ( 2007). Readability of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry Patient Education Materials. Pediatric Dentistry, 29, 431-435.
2.
Bailey, D., Winton, P.J., Rouse, L., & Turnbull, A. ( 1990). Family goals in infant intervention: Analysis and issues . Journal of Early Intervention, 14, 15-26.
3.
Bailin, A., & Gradstein, A. ( 2001). The linguistic assumptions underlying readability formulae: A critique. Language and Communication, 21, 285-301.
4.
Baker, M., & Taub, H. ( 1983). Readability of informed consent forms for research in a Veterans Administration medical center. Journal of the American Medical Association, 250, 2646-2648.
5.
Boone, H., McBride, S., Swann, D., Moore, S., & Drew, B. ( 1998). IFSP practices in two states: Implications for practice . Infants and Young Children, 10(4), 36-45.
6.
Boone, H.A., Moore, S.M., & Coulter, D.K. ( 1995). Achieving family-centered practice in early intervention . Infant Toddler Intervention, 5, 395-404.
7.
Bruder, M.B., Staff, I., & McMurrer-Kaminer, E. (1997). Toddlers receiving early intervention in childcare centers: A description of a service delivery system . Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 17, 185-208.
8.
D’Alessandro, D., Kingsley, P., & Johnson-West, J. (2001). The readability of pediatric patient education materials on the World Wide Web. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 155, 807-812.
9.
Dale, E., & Chall, J.S. ( 1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 11-20.
10.
Danaher, J., Goode, S., & Lazara, A. ( 2007). Part C updates (9th ed.). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center.
11.
DuBay, W. ( 2004). The principles of readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact Information.
12.
Epstein, J.L., & Sheldon, S.B. ( 2006). Moving forward: Ideas for research on school, family, and community partnerships In C. F. Conrad & R. Serline (Eds.), SAGE handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 117-138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13.
Fan, X.T., & Chen, M. ( 2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 1-22.
14.
Fernández Huerta, J. ( 1959). Simple measures of readability. Consigna , 214, 29-32.
15.
Freda, M. ( 2005). The readability of American Academy of Pediatrics patient education brochures. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19, 151-156.
16.
Gardner-Bonneau, D. ( 2007). Accessibility standards and their application to medical device accessibility. In J. M. Winters & M. F. Story (Eds.), Medical instrumentation: Accessibility and Usability Considerations (pp. 215-224). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press-Taylor Francis Group.
17.
Greenfield, S., Sugarman, D., Nargiso, J., & Weiss, R. ( 2005). Readability of patient handout materials in a nationwide sample of alcohol and drug abuse treatment programs. American Journal on Addictions, 14, 339-345.
18.
Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., Whiteneck, G., Bogner, J., & Rodriguez, E. ( 2008). What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation , 30, 1445-1460.
19.
Hendrickson, R., Huebner, C., & Riedy, C. ( 2006). Readability of pediatric health materials for preventative dental care. BMC Oral Health, 6(14), 1-11.
20.
Hoffman, T., & Worrall, A. ( 2004). Designing effective written health education materials: Considerations for health professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation , 26, 1166-1173.
21.
Jung, L., & Baird, S. ( 2003). Effects of service coordinator variables on individualized family service plans. Journal of Early Intervention, 25, 206- 218.
22.
Jung, L.E. ( 2007). Writing Individualized Family Service Plan strategies that fit into the ROUTINE. Young Exceptional Children, 10(3), 2-9.
23.
Kahn, A., & Pannbacker, M. (2000). Readability of educational materials for clients with cleft lip/palate and their families. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 3-9.
24.
Kaye, R., & Crowley, J. ( 2007). Designing accessible medical devices. In J. M. Winters & M. F. Story (Eds.), Medical instrumentation: Accessibility and usability considerations (pp. 233-242). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press-Taylor Francis Group.
25.
Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Jr. , Rogers, R.L., & Chissom , B.S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel. Research Branch Report, 8-75. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.
McLaughlin, G.H. ( 1969). SMOG grading: A new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12, 639-646.
28.
McWilliam, R., Ferguson, A., Harbin, G., Porter, P., Munn, D., & Vandivere, P. ( 1998). The family centeredness of individualized family service plans. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 69-82.
29.
Miedel, W.T., & Reynolds, A.J. (2003). Parent involvement in early intervention for disadvantaged children: Does it matter? Journal of School Psychology, 37, 379-402.
30.
Mosenthal, P., & Kirsch, I. ( 1998). A new measure for assessing document complexity: The PMOSE/IKIRSCH document readability formula. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 41, 638-657.
31.
National Work Group on Literacy and Health. ( 1998). Communication with patients who have limited literacy skills. Journal of Family practice, 46, 168-176.
32.
National Urban League Policy Institute. (2008 ). Early interventions for the achievement gap: The importance of family in early learning. Retrieved from: http://www.nul.org/sites/ default/files/Early%20Childhood%20Education%20-%20 Final%204_3_08.pdf
33.
Porr, C., Drummond, J., & Richter, S. ( 2006). Health literacy as an empowerment tool for low income mothers. Family Community Health, 29, 328-335.
34.
Pruitt, M. ( 2003). Relationships between reading levels of parents, readability of special education documents/forms, knowledge of IEP contents, and parental involvement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). EastTennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
35.
Stableford, S., & Mettinger, W. ( 2007). Plain language: A strategic response to the health literacy challenge. Journal of Public Health Policy, 28, 71-93.
36.
Practice Development Incorporated. (2008). SAM-Suitability Assessment of Materials for evaluation of health-related information for adults. Seattle, WA: Author .
37.
Turnbull, A., Summers, J., Turnbull, R., Brotherson, M., Winton, P., Roberts, R., . . . Stroup-Rentier, V. (2007). Family supports and services in early intervention: A bold vision. Journal of Early Intervention , 29, 187-206.
38.
US Census Bureau. (2008). US Census Bureau: State and County QuickFacts. Milwaukee County, Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/55/55079.html
39.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Bureau of Long Term Support. (2009). Annual Performance Report . Retrieved from http://dhs.wi.gov/bdds/birthto3/reports/aprffy2007rev200901.pdf
40.
Zhang, C., & Bennett, T. ( 2003). Facilitating the meaningful participation of culturally and linguistically diverse families in the IFSP and IEP process. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 18, 51-59.
