The present study investigated the role of theory of mind (ToM) skills in three forms of involvement in bullying: ringleader bullying, defending the victim(s), and victimization. Individual (affective empathy) and interpersonal variables (social preference and perceived popularity) were assumed to moderate the associations between ToM and the ways of being involved in bullying. Moderation effects by gender were also explored. Participants were 211 primary school pupils (average age = 10 years and 2 months, SD = 6 months), who took part in a ToM interview and filled in self- and peer-report questionnaires on empathy, social status, and involvement in bullying. ToM skills were positively linked to defending, and among boys this association was further strengthened by social preference. Practical implications include the need to focus on both peer relationships (i.e., status) and emotional characteristics (i.e., empathy) when trying to motivate youth with good cognitive skills to actively defend their victimized classmates.
Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. ( 1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions . Newsbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
Andreou, E. ( 2006). Social preference, perceived popularity and social intelligence: Relations to overt and relational aggression. School Psychology International, 27, 339-351.
3.
Arsenio, W.F., & Lemerise, E.A. (2001). Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence. Social Development, 10, 59-73.
4.
Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight?: Developmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression . Aggressive Behavior, 18, 815-823.
5.
Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (2000). Social intelligence - empathy = aggression?Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5, 191-200.
6.
Blair, R.J.R. ( 2005). Responding to the emotions of others: Dissociating forms of empathy through the study of typical and psychiatric populations. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 698-718.
7.
Bonino, S., Lo Coco, A., & Tani, F. ( 1998), Empatia. Processi di condivisione delle emozioni. [Empathy: Processes of sharing emotions]. Florence, Italy: Giunti.
8.
Boulton, M.J., & Smith, P.K. ( 1994). Bully/victim problems in middle school children: Stability, self-perceived competence, peer perceptions and peer acceptance. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 315-329.
9.
Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F.A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 186-197.
10.
Caravita, S.C.S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140-163.
11.
Cillessen, A.H.N. ( 2009). Sociometric methods. In H. K. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82-99). New York: Guilford.
12.
Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. ( 2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147-163.
13.
Cillessen, A.H.N. & Rose, A. ( 2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102-105.
14.
Ciucci, E., & Fonzi, A. ( 1999). La grammatica delle emozioni in prepotenti e vittime. [The grammar of the emotions of bullies and victims]. In A. Fonzi (Ed.), Il gioco crudele: Studi e ricerche sui correlati psicologici del bullismo [The cruel game: Studies and research data on psychological correlates of bullying]. (pp. 27-38). Florence , Italy: Giunti.
15.
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology , 18, 557-570.
16.
Coie, J.D., Dodge, K.A., & Kupersmidt, J.B. (1990). Peer group behavior and social status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood (pp. 17-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Crick, N.R., & Dodge, K.A. ( 1996). Social information processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993-1002.
18.
Crick, N.R., & Grotpeter, J.K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development , 66, 721-722.
19.
Crick, N.R., & Ladd, G.W. ( 1990). Nominator attrition: Does it affect the accuracy of children’s sociometric classifications. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 35, 197-207.
20.
Denham, S.A., McKinley, M., Couchoud, E.A., & Holt, R. ( 1990). Emotional and behavioural predictors of preschool peer ratings. Child Development, 61, 1145-1152.
21.
Eisenberg, N. ( 1989). Empathy and related emotional responses. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
22.
Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R.A. ( 1998). Prosocial development. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional and personality development (5th ed., pp. 701-778). New York: Wiley.
23.
Ellis, W., & Zarbatany, L. ( 2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant and aggressive behavior. Child Development , 78, 1240-1254.
24.
Espelage, D.L., Bosworth, K., & Simon, T.R. ( 2000). Examining the social context of bullying behaviors in early adolescence. Journal of Counseling & Development , 78, 326-333.
25.
Espelage, D.L., Mebane, S.E., & Swearer, S.M. ( 2004). Gender differences in bullying: Moving beyond mean level differences. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 15-35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Feshbach, N.D., & Feshbach, S. ( 1982). Learning to care. San Francisco: Scott, Foresman.
27.
Feshbach, N.D., Caprara, G.V., Lo Coco, A., Pastorelli, C., Manna, G., & Menzres, J. ( 1991). Empathy and its correlates: Cross cultural data from Italy. Oral communication presented at 11th Biennal Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development , Minneapolis.
28.
Fox, C.L., & Boulton, M.J. ( 2006). Friendship as a moderator of the relationship between social skills problems and peer victimisation. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 110-121.
29.
Garandeau, C., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation . Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 612-625.
30.
Garner, P.W., & Lemerise, E.A. (2007). The roles of behavioral adjustment and conceptions of peers and emotions in preschool children’s peer victimization. Development and Psychopathology, 19, 57-71.
31.
Gazelle, H. ( 2006). Class climate moderates peer relations and emotional adjustment in children with an early history of anxious solitude: A child by environment model. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1179-1192.
32.
Gini, G. ( 2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528-539.
33.
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467-476.
34.
Goossens, F.A., Olthof, T., & Dekker, P.H. ( 2006). New Participant Role Scales: Comparison between various criteria for assigning roles and indications for their validity. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 343-357.
35.
Happé, F. ( 1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129-154.
36.
Hawley, P.H. ( 2007). Social dominance in childhood and adolescence: Why social competence and aggression may go hand in hand. In P. H. Hawley, T. D. Little, & P. C. Rodkin (Eds.), Aggression and adaptation: The bright side to bad behaviour (pp. 1-29), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Hodges, E.V.E., & Perry, D.G. ( 1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677-685.
38.
Italian National Institute of Statistics. ( 2007). Rapporto Annuale: La situazione nel Paese nel 2006. [Annual report: The situation of the Country in 2006]. Rome, Italy: Author.
39.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D.P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 540-550.
40.
Juvonen, J., & Galvan, A. ( 2008). Peer contagion in involuntary social groups: Lessons from research on bullying. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.), Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 225-244). New York: Guilford Press.
41.
Kaukiainen, A., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K., Österman, K., Salmivalli, C., Rothberg, S., et al. (1999). The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior , 25, 81-89.
42.
Kaukiainen, A., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Lagerspetz, K.M.J. (1996). Social intelligence and empathy as antecedents of different types of aggression. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 794, 364-366.
43.
Ladd, G.W. ( 2005). Children’s peer relations and social competence: A century of progress. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
44.
Ladd, G.W., & Burgess, K.B. ( 2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school adjustment ? Child Development, 72, 1579-1601.
45.
LaFontana, K.M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
46.
Lemerise, E.A., & Arsenio, W.F. ( 2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107-118.
47.
McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Vallaincourt, T., & Mercer, L. ( 2001). The consequences of childhood peer rejection. In M. R. Leary (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 213-247). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48.
Meisinger, E.B., Blake, J.J., Lease, A.M., Palardy, S.F., & Olejnik, S.F. ( 2007). Variant and invariant predictors of perceived popularity across majority-Black and majority-White classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 21-44.
49.
Menesini, E., & Gini, G. ( 2000). Il bullismo come processo di gruppo. Adattamento e validazione del Questionario Ruoli dei Partecipanti alla popolazione italiana. [Bullying as a group process: Adaptation and validation of the Participant Role Questionnaire to the Italian population]. Età Evolutiva, 66, 18-32.
50.
Miller, P.A., & Eisenberg, N. ( 1988). The relationship of empathy to aggressive and externalising/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324-344.
51.
Monks, C.P., Smith, P.K., & Swettenham, J. (2005). Psychological correlates of peer victimisation in preschool: Social cognitive skills, executive function and attachment profiles. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 571-588.
52.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998-2007). Mplus user’s guide: Statistical analysis with latent variables (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
53.
Olweus, D. ( 1993). Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
54.
Olweus, D. ( 1994). Bullying at school: Long-term outcomes for the victims and an effective school-based Intervention program. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior. Current perspectives (pp. 97-130). New York: Plenum.
55.
Olweus, D., & Endresen, I.M. (1998). The importance of sex-of-stimulus object: Age trends and sex differences in empathic responsiveness. Social Development, 7, 370-388.
56.
Orobio de Castro, B., Veerman, J.W., Koops, W., Bosch, J.D., & Monshouwer, H.J. (2002). Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behaviour: A meta-analysis. Child Development , 73, 916-934.
57.
Österman, K., Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K.M.J., Kaukiainen, A., Landau, S.F., Fraczek, A., et al. (1998). Cross-cultural evidence of female indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 1-8.
58.
Parker, J.G., Rubin, K.H., Price, J.M., & DeRosier, M. ( 1995). Peer relationships, child development, and adjustment: A developmental psychopathology perspective. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology, Vol. 2: Risk, disorder and adaptation (pp. 96-161). New York: John Wiley.
59.
Parkhurst, J.T., & Hopmeyer, A. ( 1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity: Two distinct dimensions of peer status. Journal of Early Adolescence , 18, 125-144.
60.
Pellegrini, A.D., & Long, J.D. ( 2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280.
61.
Perry, D., Kusel, S., & Perry, L. ( 1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814.
62.
Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. ( 1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 1, 515-526.
63.
Prinstein, M., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.
64.
Richardson, R., Hammock, G.S., Smith, S.M., Gardner, W., & Signo, M. ( 1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression . Aggressive Behavior, 20, 275-289.
65.
Rodkin, P., Farmer, T., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. ( 2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: Antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36, 14-24.
66.
Rose, A.J., & Rudolph, K.D. ( 2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98-131.
67.
Rose, A., Swenson, L., & Waller, E. ( 2004). Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: Developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. Developmental Psychology, 40, 378-387.
68.
Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. ( 2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children’s self- and peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76, 1161-1171.
69.
Salmivalli, C., Kärnä, A., & Poskiparta, E. (in press). Development, evaluation, and diffusion of a national anti-bullying program (KiVa). In B. Doll, W. Pfohl, & J. Yoon (Eds.), Handbook of youth prevention science. New York: Routledge.
70.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
71.
Salmivalli, C., & Peets, K. ( 2008). Bullies, victims, and bully-victim relationships. In K. Rubin, W. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 322-340). New York: Guilford.
72.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. ( 2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246-258
73.
Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. ( 2006). Physical, verbal and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261-275.
74.
Schwartz, D., Dodge, K.A., Coie, J.D., Hubbard, J.A., Cillessen, A.H.N., Lemerise, E.A., et al. (1998). Social-cognitive and behavioral correlates of aggression and victimization in boys’ play groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 431-440.
75.
Schwartz, D., Gorman, A.H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. ( 2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1116-1127.
76.
Strayer, J. ( 1987). Affective and cognitive perspectives on empathy. In N. Eisenberg & J. Strayer (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 218-244). New York: Cambridge University Press.
77.
Sutton, J. ( 2003). ToM goes to school: Social cognition and social values in bullying. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind (pp. 99-120). New York: Psychology Press.
78.
Sutton, J., Smith, P.K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and "theory of mind": A critique of the "social skills deficit" view of anti-social behavior . Social Development, 8, 117-127.
79.
Sutton, J., Smith, P.K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435-450.
80.
Sutton, J., Smith, P.K., & Swettenham, J. (1999c). Socially undesirable need not be incompetent: A response to Crick and Dodge. Social Development, 8, 132-134.
81.
Vaillancourt, T. ( 2005). Indirect aggression in humans: Social construct or evolutionary adaptation? In R. Tremblay, W. Hartup, & J. Archer (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression (pp. 158-177). New York: Guilford.
82.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A.J., De Winter, A.F.Verhulst, F.C., & Ormel, J. ( 2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672-682.
83.
Warden, D., & MacKinnon, S. ( 2003). Prosocial children, bullies and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and social problem-solving strategies . British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367-385.
84.
Wentzel, K.R. ( 2003). Sociometric status and adjustment in middle school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 23, 5-28.
