This study examined pathways through which family socioeconomic status may influence adolescents’ academic achievement. We focused on parental monitoring and adolescents’ after-school time-use patterns as linking mechanisms. Participants were 441 twelve- to fourteen-year-old Korean adolescents who participated in the Korea Welfare Panel Study. Higher family economic pressure was linked with lower parental monitoring through elevated levels of parental depression. Parental monitoring was associated with more time spent in structured learning-oriented activities and less time spent in unstructured nonacademic activities. Both types of time-use activities and parental monitoring were associated with academic achievement. The results supported both the family stress model and the family investment model, indicating that families’ socioeconomic conditions were directly and indirectly linked to adolescents’ academic achievement. The findings are discussed in the context of Korean culture, which emphasizes high parental involvement and economic investment in children’s education. We also present broader implications beyond the local context.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2001). Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics, 107, 423-426.
2.
BarreraM.PrelowH. M.DumkaL. E.GonzalesN. A.KnightG. P.MichaelsM. L.. . . TeinJ. (2002). Pathways from family economic conditions to adolescents’ distress: Supportive parenting, stressors outside the family, and deviant peers. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 135-152.
3.
BeckerG. S.TomesN. (1994). Human capital and the rise and fall of families. In BeckerG. S. (Ed.), Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed., pp. 257-298). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
4.
BentlerP. M.BonettD. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5.
BianchiS. M.RobinsonJ. (1997). What did you do today? Children’s use of time, family composition, and the acquisition of social capital. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 332-344.
6.
BradleyR. H.CorwynR. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
7.
BrayM. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare, 36, 515-530.
8.
BrodyG. H.StonemanZ.FlorD.McCraryC.HastingsL.ConyersO. (1994). Financial resources, parent psychological functioning, parent co-caregiving, and early adolescent competence in rural two-parent African-American families. Child Development, 65, 590-605.
9.
Brooks-GunnJ.DuncanG. J. (1997). The effects of poverty on children. The Future of Children, 7(2), 55-71.
10.
ByunS. Y.KimK. K. (2010). Educational inequality in South Korea: The widening socioeconomic gap in student achievement. Research in the Sociology of Education, 17, 155-182.
11.
CaroD. H.McDonaldJ. T.WillmsJ. D. (2009). Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education, 32, 558-590.
12.
CernkovichS. A.GiordanoP. C. (1987). Family relationships and delinquency. Criminology, 24, 295-321.
13.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J.ElderG. H.LorenzF. O.SimonsR. L.WhitbeckL. B. (1992). A family process model of economic hardship and adjustment of early adolescent boys. Child Development, 63, 526-541.
14.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J.MartinM. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 685-704.
15.
CongerR. D.ElderG. H. (1994). Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
16.
ConnersN. A.TripathiS. P.ClubbR.BradleyR. H. (2007). Maternal characteristics associated with television viewing habits of low-income preschool children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 415-425.
17.
DavisonK. K.FrancisL. A.BirchL. L. (2005). Link between parents’ and girls’ television viewing behaviors: A longitudinal examination. The Journal of Pediatrics, 147, 436-442.
18.
DevauxM.SassiF.ChurchJ.CecchiniM.BorgonoviF. (2011). Exploring the relationship between education and obesity. OECD Journal, 2011, 121-145.
19.
DottererA. M.McHaleS. M.CrouterA. C. (2007). Implications of out-of-school activities for school engagement in African American adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 391-401.
20.
DuncanG. J.MagnusonK. A. (2003). Off with Hollingshead: Socioeconomic resources, parenting, and child development. In BornsteinM. H.BradleyR. H. (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 83-106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
GomezL. F.ParraD. C.LobeloF.SamperB.MorenoJ.JacobyE.. . . BordaC. (2007). Television viewing and its association with overweight in Colombian children: Results from the 2005 National Nutrition Survey: A cross sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 4(1), 41-48.
22.
HancoxR. J.MilneB. J.PoultonR. (2005). Association of television viewing during childhood with poor educational achievement. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 159, 614-618.
23.
HarperC.MarcusR.MooreK. (2003). Enduring poverty and the conditions of childhood: Lifecourse and intergenerational poverty transmissions. World Development, 31, 535-554.
24.
HofferthS. L.SandbergJ. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 295-308.
25.
JagoR.DavisonK. K.ThompsonJ. L.PageA. S.BrockmanR.FoxK. R. (2011). Parental sedentary restriction, maternal parenting style, and television viewing among 10- to 11-year-olds. Pediatrics, 128, e572-e578.
26.
JeynesW. (2011). Parental involvement and academic success. New York, NY: Routledge.
27.
JungJ. Y.KimY. C.LinW. Y.CheongP. H. (2005). The influence of social environment on Internet connectedness of adolescents in Seoul, Singapore and Taipei. New Media & Society, 7, 64-88.
28.
KimS.LeeJ. H. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58, 259-296.
29.
KnightR. G.WilliamsS.McGeeR.OlamanS. (1997). Psychometric properties of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a sample of women in middle life. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 373-380.
30.
KohlerM.AldridgeJ.ChristensenL. M.KilgoJ. (2012). Issues in education: Tiger moms: Five questions that need to be answered. Childhood Education, 88, 52-53.
31.
KwackS. Y.LeeY. S. (2007). The distribution and polarization of income in Korea, 1965-2005: A historical analysis. Journal of Economic Development, 32(2), 1-39.
32.
LarsonR. W.VermaS. (1999). How children and adolescents spend time across the world: Work, play, and developmental opportunities. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 701-736.
33.
LeoneC. M.RichardsH. (1989). Classwork and homework in early adolescence: The ecology of achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 531-548.
34.
LeungF. K. S. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In LeungF. K. S.GrafK.Lopez-RealF. J. (Eds.), Mathematics education in different cultural traditions: A comparative study of East Asia and the West (pp. 21-46). New York, NY: Springer.
35.
MaddenD.BruekmanJ.LittlejohnK. V. (1997). A contrast of amount and type of activity in elementary school years between academically successful and unsuccessful youth. Education Resources Information Center. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED411067
36.
MastenA. S.RoismanG. I.LongJ. D.BurtK. B.ObradovićJ.RileyJ. R.. . .TellegenA. (2005). Developmental cascades: Linking academic achievement and externalizing and internalizing symptoms over 20 years. Developmental Psychology, 41, 733-746.
37.
MullisI. V.MartinM. O.FoyP.AroraA. (2012). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
38.
NguyenH. T.Kitner-TrioloM.EvansM. K.ZondermanA. B. (2004). Factorial invariance of the CES-D in low socioeconomic status African Americans compared with a nationally representative sample. Psychiatry Research, 126, 177-187.
ParkC.ParkD. (2006). Factors affecting Korean students’ achievement in TIMSS 1999. In HowieS. J.PlompT. (Eds.), Contexts of learning mathematics and science (pp. 177-194). New York, NY: Routledge.
42.
ParkH.ByunS. Y.KimK. K. (2011). Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea focusing on private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 84, 3-22.
43.
ParkK.LeungF. K. S. (2004, January). Factors contributing to East Asian students’ high achievement in mathematics: The case of Korea. APEC Summit Conference, Beijing, China.
44.
ParkY. S.KimU. (2006). Family, parent-child relationship, and academic achievement in Korea. In KimU.YangK.HwangK. (Eds.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 421-443). New York, NY: Springer.
45.
PearsK. C.KimH. K.FisherP. A. (2008). Psychosocial and cognitive functioning of children with specific profiles of maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 958-971.
46.
PowellD. R.PeetS. H.PeetC. E. (2002). Low-income children’s academic achievement and participation in out-of-school activities in 1st grade. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 16, 202-211.
47.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
48.
RadloffL. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401.
49.
ReisingM. M.WatsonK. H.HardcastleE. J.MerchantM. J.RobertsL.ForehandR.CompasB. E. (2012). Parental depression and economic disadvantage: The role of parenting in associations with internalizing and externalizing symptoms in children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 22, 335-343.
50.
RomerD.BagdasarovZ.MoreE. (2013). Older versus newer media and the well-being of United States youth: Results from a national longitudinal panel. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52, 613-619.
51.
SchneiderB.LeeY. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21, 358-377.
52.
ShinN. (2004). Exploring pathways from television viewing to academic achievement in school age children. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 165, 367-382.
53.
SirinS. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75, 417-453.
54.
SorensenC. W. (1994). Success and education in South Korea. Comparative Education Review, 38, 10-35.
55.
SteigerJ. H.LindJ. M. (1980, June). Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
56.
WeintraubK. J.GoldM. (1991). Monitoring and delinquency. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 1, 268-281.
57.
WickramaK. A. S.LorenzF. O.CongerR. D.MatthewsL.ElderG. H.Jr. (1997). Linking occupational conditions to physical health through marital, social, and intrapersonal processes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 38, 363-375.
58.
WickramaK. A. S.O’NealC. W. (2013). Family of origin, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic attainment: Genotype and intraindividual processes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 75-90.
59.
WonS. J.HanS. (2010). Out-of-school activities and achievement among middle school students in the US and South Korea. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 628-661.
60.
WrightV. R.PriceJ.BianchiS. M.HuntB. R. (2009). The time use of teenagers. Social Science Research, 38, 792-809.
61.
ZhangB.FokkemaM.CuijpersP.LiJ.SmitsN.BeekmanA. (2011). Measurement invariance of the center for epidemiological studies depression scale (CES-D) among Chinese and Dutch elderly. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 74-83.
