AACSB International advocates integration of ethics, corporate social responsibility, and sustainability in all business school disciplines. This study provides an overview of the implementation of these three topics in teaching initiatives and assessment in business schools accredited by AACSB International. Since no comprehensive studies have been conducted for the marketing area, the results provide benchmarks as well as thought-provoking material to initiate business school and marketing faculty discussions on integrating the three topics into their curricula.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlD. R.BloomB. S. (2005). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
6.
BarnettS. T.DascherP. E.NicholsonC. Y. (2004). Can school oversight adequately assess department outcomes? A study of marketing curriculum content. Journal of Education for Business, 79, 157-162.
7.
BeggsJ. M. (2011). Seamless integration of ethics. Marketing Education Review, 21, 49-56.
8.
BloomB. S.EngelhartM.FurstE. J.HillW. H.KrathwohlD. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook I. Cognitive domain. New York, NY: David McKay.
9.
BooseM. A.DeanF. P. (2011). A proposition for effective integration of ethics across the business curriculum. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 1(3), 1-8.
10.
BrennanL. L.AustinW. W. (2003). Addressing the need for management processes for higher education accreditation. Innovative Higher Education, 28, 49-62.
11.
BrewerP.BrewerK. (2010). Knowledge management, human resource management, and higher education: A theoretical model. Journal of Education for Business, 85, 330-335.
12.
BridgesC. M.WilhelmW. B. (2008). Going beyond green: The “why and how” of integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 33-46.
13.
ChristensenL. J.PeirceE.HartmanL. P.HoffmanW. M.CarrierJ. (2007). Ethics, CSR, and sustainability education in the Financial Times Top 50 Global Business Schools: Baseline data and future research directions. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 347-368.
14.
CrittendenV. L.WilsonE. J. (2006). An exploratory study of cross-functional education in the undergraduate marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 81-86.
15.
CroslingG.EdwardsR.SchroderB. (2008). Internationalizing the curriculum: the implementation experience in a faculty of business and economics. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 30, 107-121.
16.
De La Vega LeinertA.Stoll-KleemannS.O’RiordanT. (2009). Sustainability science partnerships in concept and in practice: A guide to a new curriculum from a European perspective. Geographical Research, 47, 351-361.
17.
ElkingtonJ.HailesJ. (1988). The green consumer guide: From shampoo to champagne, how to buy goods that don’t cost the earth. London, England: Gollancz.
18.
EvansF. J.MarcalL. E. (2005). Educating for ethics: Business deans’ perspectives. Business and Society Review, 110, 233-248.
19.
FrontczakN. T. (1998). A paradigm for the selection, use and development of experiential learning activities in marketing education. Marketing Education Review, 8, 25-34.
GodfreyP. C.HatchN. W. (2007). Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 87-98.
22.
HairJ. (1995). Marketing Education in the 1990s: A chairperson’s retrospective assessment and perspective. Marketing Education Review, 5, 1-6.
23.
HairJ.CelsiM.OrtinauD.BushR. (2013). Essentials of marketing research (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
24.
HamiltonJ. G.KlebbaJ. M. (2011). Experiential learning: A course design process for critical thinking. American Journal of Business Education, 4, 1-12.
25.
HealyW. J.TaranZ.BettsS. C. (2011). Sales course design using experiential learning principles and Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 6, 1-10.
26.
KrathwohlD. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 212-218.
27.
KurpisL. V.BeqiriM. S.HelgesonJ. G. (2008). The effects of commitment to moral self-improvement and religiosity on ethics of business students. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 447-463.
28.
MacfarlaneB.OttewillR. (2005). Business ethics in the curriculum: Assessing the evidence from UK subject review. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 339-347.
29.
MarshallJ. B.CarsonC. M. (2011). A preliminary Bloom’s taxonomy assessment of end-of-chapter problems in business school textbooks. American Journal of Business Education, 1, 71-78.
30.
MattenD.MoonJ. (2004). Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 323-337.
31.
McDonaldG. M. (2005). A case example: Integrating ethics into the academic business curriculum. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 371-384.
32.
MoonJ.OrlitzkyM. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability education: A trans-Atlantic comparison. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 583-603.
33.
NicholsonC. Y.DeMossM. (2009). Teaching ethics and social responsibility: An evaluation of undergraduate business education at the discipline level. Journal of Education for Business, 84, 213-218.
34.
PalocsayS. W.StevensS. P. (2008). A study of the effectiveness of web-based homework in teaching undergraduate business statistics. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6, 213-232.
35.
RascheA.GilbertD. U.SchedelI. (2013). Cross-disciplinary ethics education in MBA programs: Rhetoric or reality?Academy of Management Learning & Education, 12, 71-85. doi:10.5465/amle.2011.0016A
36.
Rundle-ThieleS. R.WymerW. (2010). Stand-alone ethics, social responsibility, and sustainability course requirements. Journal of Marketing Education, 32, 5-12.
37.
RusinkoC. A. (2010). Integrating sustainability in higher education: a generic matrix. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11, 250-259.
38.
RutherfordM. A.ParksL.CavazosD. E.WhiteC. D. (2012). Business ethics as a required course: Investigating the factors impacting the decision to require ethics in the undergraduate business core curriculum. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 174-186.
39.
SavitzA. W.WeberK. (2006). The triple bottom line: How today’s best-run companies are achieving economic, social and environmental success—and how you can too. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
40.
ShaftelJ.ShaftelT. L. (2007). Educational assessment and the AACSB. Issues in Accounting Education, 22, 215-232.
41.
ShapiroS. J. (2012). Macromarketing teaching materials: A forty-year retrospective. Journal of Macromarketing, 32, 412-416.
42.
SimkinM. G.KuechlerW. L. (2004). Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: What is the connection?Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 3, 73-98.
43.
StubbsW.SchapperJ. (2011). Two approaches to curriculum development for educating for sustainability and CSR. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12, 259-268.
WaddockS.RascheA.WerhaneP. H.UnruhG. C. (2011). The principles for responsible management education (PRME): Implications for Implementation and Assessment. In SwansonD. L.FisherD. G. (Eds.), Toward assessing business ethics education (pp. 13-29). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
46.
WrightN. S.BennettH. (2011). Business ethics, CSR, sustainability and the MBA. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 641-655.
47.
WuY. C. J.HuangS.KuoL.WuW. H. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 520-531.
48.
YunkerP. J. (1998). A survey of business school heads on mission-linked AACSB. Journal of Education for Business, 73, 137-143.