Although luxury firms have come under increasing pressure to engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, they have traditionally been hesitant to engage because of the CSR–luxury paradox: the values and motivations underlying luxury consumption (self-enhancement) may conflict with the values and motivations underlying prosocial behavior (self-transcendence), and thus their CSR initiatives may not only be ineffective, they may actually harm the brand. In this commentary, we discuss research on the strategies and tactics luxury brands can use to nudge luxury consumers to engage in their cause-related marketing (CRM) initiatives by aligning the values of their luxury customers with the symbolic values of their CRM offerings and thus increase the impact of the prosocial causes on societal well-being. This research supports the objectives of transformative luxury research (TLR) in integrating luxury consumption into the mission and vision of transformative consumer research (TCR).
AchabouMohamed AkliDekhiliSihem (2013), “Luxury and Sustainable Development: Is There a Match?” Journal of Business Research, 66 (10), 1896-1903.
2.
AmatulliCesareDe AngelisMatteoDonatoCarmela (2021), “The Atypicality of Sustainable Luxury Products,” Psychology & Marketing, 38 (11), 1990-2005.
3.
AndrewsMichelleLuoXuemingFangZhengAsparaJaakko (2014), “Cause-Related Effectiveness and the Moderating Role of Price Discounts,” Journal of Marketing, 78 (6), 120-142.
4.
BatatWided (2022a), “Consumers’ Perceptions of Food Ethics in Luxury Dining,” Journal of Services Marketing, 36 (5), 754-766.
5.
BatatWided (2022b), The Rise of Positive Luxury: Transformative Research Agenda for Well-being, Social Impact, and Sustainable Growth. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
6.
BatatWidedKhochmanInas (2021), “Is Luxury Compatible with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)? Models for Sustainable Marketing Strategies,” in Global Marketing Strategies for the Promotion of Luxury Goods, MoscaFabrizioCasalegnoCeciliaGalloRosalia, eds. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 179-196.
7.
BatatWidedManikaDanae (2020), “Advancing Transformative Luxury Research: Contributions to Marketing Theory about Luxury, Ethics, and Well-Being,” Journal of Macromarketing, 40 (4), 583-584.
8.
BauerMonica A.WilkieJames E. B.KimJung K.BodenhausenGalen V. (2012), “Cuing Consumerism: Situational Materialism Undermines Personal and Social Well-Being,” Psychological Science, 23 (5), 517-523.
9.
BelkRussell W. (1999), “Leaping Luxuries and Transitional Consumers,” in Marketing Issues in Transitional Economies, BatraRajeev, ed. Boston, MA: Springer, 39-54.
10.
BoenigkSilkeSchuchardtViktoria (2013), “Cause–Related Marketing Campaigns with Luxury Firms: An Experimental Study of Campaign Characteristics, Attitudes, and Donations,” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 18 (2), 101-121.
11.
ChangDae RyunJangJoonsukLeeHosunNamMyungwoo (2019), “The Effects of Power on Consumers’ Evaluation of a Luxury Brand’s Corporate Social Responsibility,” Psychology & Marketing, 36 (1), 72-83.
12.
ChenNingPetersenFrancineLowreyTina M. (2022), “The Effect of Altruistic Gift Giving on Self-Indulgence in Affordable Luxury,” Journal of Business Research, 146, 84–94.
13.
ChenNingPetersenFrancine Espinoza (2022), “Consumers’ Cooperation with Sustainability Programs: The Role of Luxury Branding and Profit Motive Attribution,” Journal of Macromarketing, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467221111987.
14.
CristiniHélèneKauppinen-RäisänenHanneleWoodsideArch G. (2022), “Broadening the Concept of Luxury: Transformations and Contributions to Well-Being,” Journal of Macromarketing, forthcoming, https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467221116779.
FlynnLeisa ReineckeGoldsmithRonald E.PollitteWesley (2016), “Materialism, Status Consumption, and Market Involved Consumers,” Psychology & Marketing, 33 (9), 761-776.
17.
FuchsChristophPrandelliEmanuelaSchreierMartinDahlDarren W. (2013), “All that is Users Might not be Gold: How Labeling Products as User Designed Backfires in the Context of Luxury Fashion Brands,” Journal of Marketing, 77 (5), 75-91.
18.
GoldringDeborahAzabCarol (2021), “New Rules of Social Media Shopping: Personality Differences of US Gen Z versus Gen X Market Mavens,” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20 (4), 884-897.
19.
GriskeviciusVladasTyburJoshua M.Van den BerghBram (2010), “Going Green to be Seen: Status, Reputation, and Conspicuous Conservation,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98 (3), 392-404.
20.
HagtvedtHenrikPatrickVanessa M. (2016), “Gilt and Guilt: Should Luxury and Charity Partner at the Point of Sale?” Journal of Retailing, 92 (1), 56-64.
21.
HanYoung JeeNunesJoseph C.DrèzeXavier (2010), “Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence,” Journal of Marketing, 74 (4), 15-30.
22.
HellerJoseph (1961), Catch-22. New York: Simon & Schuster.
23.
HuddersLiselotPandelaereMario (2012), “The Silver Lining of Materialism: The Impact of Luxury Consumption on Subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Happiness Studies, 13 (3), 411-437.
24.
HumphreysAshlee (2014), “How is Sustainability Structured? The Discursive Life of Environmentalism,” Journal of Macromarketing, 34 (3), 265-281.
25.
KapfererJean-Noël (2015), Kapferer on Luxury: How Luxury Brands Can Grow Yet Remain Rare. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
26.
KasserTim (2016), “Materialistic Values and Goals,” Annual Review of Psychology, 67 (January), 489-514.
27.
KimSukhyunParkKiwanShrumL. J. (2022), “Cause–Related Marketing of Luxury Brands: Nudging Materialists to Act Prosocially,” Psychology & Marketing, 39 (6), 1204-1217. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21648.
28.
KoEunjuCostelloJohn P.TaylorCharles R. (2019), “What is a Luxury Brand? A New Definition and Review of the Literature,” Journal of Business Research, 99, 405-413.
29.
KrishnaAradhna (2011), “Can Supporting a Cause Decrease Donations and Happiness? The Cause Marketing Paradox,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21 (3), 338-345.
30.
LeeDong-JinJoseph SirgyM. (2004), “Quality-of-life (QOL) Marketing: Proposed Antecedents and Consequences,” Journal of Macromarketing, 24 (1), 44-58.
31.
LeeMichael T.RaschkeRobyn L.KrishenAnjala S. (2022), “Signaling Green! Firm ESG Signals in An Interconnected Environment that Promote Brand Valuation,” Journal of Business Research, 138, 1-11.
32.
MickDavid G.PettigrewSimonePechmannCorneliaOzanneJulie L. (2012), Transformative Consumer Research for Personal and Collective Well-being. New York: Routledge.
33.
NelissenRob M. A.MeijersMarijn H. C. (2011), “Social Benefits of Luxury Brands as Costly Signals of Wealth And Status,” Evolution and Human Behavior, 32 (5), 343-355.
34.
PandelaereMarioShrumL. J. (2020), “Fulfilling Identity Motives Through Luxury Consumption,” in Research Handbook on Luxury Branding, MorhartFelicitasWilcoxKeithCzellarSandor, eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 57-74.
35.
RichinsMarsha L (1994), “Special Possessions and the Expression of Material Values,” Journal of Consumer Research, 21 (3), 522-533.
36.
RichinsMarsha L.DawsonScott (1992), “A Consumer Values Orientation for Materialism and its Measurement: Scale Development and Validation,” Journal of Consumer Research, 19 (3), 303-316.
37.
RobinsonStefanie RosenIrmakCaglarJayachandranSatish (2012), “Choice of Cause in Cause-Related Marketing,” Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 126-139.
38.
ShinSeung-AJangJong-OhKimJong-KulChoEun-Hyung (2021), “Relations of Conspicuous Consumption Tendency, Self-Expression Satisfaction, and SNS Use Satisfaction of Gen Z through SNS Activities,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18 (22), 11979.
39.
ShrumL. J.ChaplinLan NguyenLowreyTina M. (2022), “Causes, Correlates, and Consequences of Materialism,” Consumer Psychology Review, 5 (1), 69-86.
40.
ShrumL. J.WongNancyArifFarrahChuganiSunaina K.GunzAlexanderLowreyTina M., et al. (2013), “Reconceptualizing Materialism as Identity Goal Pursuits: Functions, Processes, and Consequences,” Journal of Business Research, 66 (8), 1179-1185.
41.
SirgyM. Joseph (2008), “Ethics and Public Policy Implications of Research on Consumer Well-Being,” Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 27 (2), 207-212.
42.
SirgyM. Joseph (2021), “Macromarketing Metrics of Consumer Wellbeing: An Update,” Journal of Macromarketing, 41 (1), 124-131.
43.
SpielmannNathalieDobschaSusanShrumL. J. (2023), “Brands and Social Justice Movements: The Effects of True vs. Performative Allyship on Brand Evaluation,” Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 8 (1), forthcoming.
44.
SrivastavaAbhishekLockeEdwin A.BartolKathryn M. (2001), “Money and Subjective Well-Being: It's not the Money, it's the Motives,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (6), 959-971.
45.
StrahilevitzMichal (1999), “The Effects of Product Type and Donation Magnitude on Willingness to Pay More for a Charity-linked Brand,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8 (3), 215-241.
46.
StrahilevitzMichalMyersJohn G. (1998), “Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How well They Work may Depend on What you are Trying to Sell,” Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434-446.
47.
SundieJill M.KenrickDouglas T.GriskeviciusVladasTyburJoshua M.VohsKathleen D.BealDaniel J. (2011), “Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: Conspicuous Consumption as a Sexual Signaling System,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100 (4), 664-680.
48.
TorelliCarlos J.MongaAlokparna BasuKaikatiAndrew M. (2012), “Doing Poorly by Doing Good: Corporate Social Responsibility and Brand Concepts,” Journal of Consumer Research, 38 (5), 948-963.
49.
TurnerAnthony (2015), “Generation Z: Technology and Social Interest,” The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71 (2), 103-113.
50.
VaradarajanP. RajanMenonAnil (1988), “Cause Related Marketing: A Co-Alignment of Marketing Strategy and Corporate Philanthropy,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 58-74.
51.
WellsVictoriaAthwalNavdeepNervinoEsterinaCarriganMarylyn (2021), “How Legitimate are the Environmental Sustainability Claims of Luxury Conglomerates?” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 25 (4), 697-722.
52.
WhiteKatherineHabibRishadHardistyDavid J. (2019), “How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework,” Journal of Marketing, 83 (3), 22-49.
53.
WongJia YunDhaneshGanga S. (2017), “Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in the Luxury Industry: Managing CSR–Luxury Paradox Online through Acceptance Strategies of Coexistence and Convergence,” Management Communication Quarterly, 31 (1), 88-112.
54.
YounSong-yiChoEunjoo (2022), “CSR Ads Matter to Luxury Fashion Brands: A Construal Level Approach to Understand Gen Z Consumers’ eWOM on Social Media,” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 26 (3), 516-533.
