Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the effects of capitalist production on social systems of procreation, drawing from Marxist political and economic theory. It argues that capitalism introduces an increasing degree of alienation into procreation and that capitalism builds the basis for a certain degree of degendering systems of procreation. These trends are considered with regard to Marxist feminism, radical feminism, queer, and trans liberation. Procreative extension, the expansion of all types of procreative labors and relationships beyond gender categories, is offered as a critical political ideal.

Keywords

procreation capitalism marxist feminism transgender radical feminism trans pregnancy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anttila-Hughes

J. K.

Fernald

L. C. H.

Gertler

P. J.

Krause

Wydick

(2018). Mortality from nestlé’s marketing of infant formula in low and middle-income countries. National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper no. 24452.

Baron

(2019). Nobody puts baby in the container: The foetal container model at work in medicine and commercial surrogacy. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 36(3), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12336

Barrett

(2014). Women’s oppression today: The marxist/feminist encounter. Verso Books.

Bassan

(2016). Fair trade as an instrument for the regulation of risks in the cross-border surrogacy market. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(4), 750–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00010175

Bell

E. F.

Hintz

S. R.

Hansen

N. I.

Bann

C. M.

Wyckoff

M. H.

DeMauro

S. B.

Walsh

M. C.

Vohr

B. R.

Stoll

B. J.

Carlo

W. A.

Van Meurs

K. P.

Rysavy

M. A.

Patel

R. M.

Merhar

S. L.

Sánchez

P. J.

Laptook

A. R.

Hibbs

A. M.

Cotten

C. M.

Das

(2022). Mortality, in-hospital morbidity, care practices, and 2-year outcomes for extremely preterm infants in the US, 2013–2018. JAMA, 327(3), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.23580

Betran

A. P.

Moller

A.-B.

Souza

J. P.

Zhang

(2021). Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates. BMJ Global Health, 6(6), Article e005671. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671

Brenner

Ramas

(1984). Rethinking women’s oppression. New Left Review, 144(1), 33–71.

Butler

(2006). Gender trouble. Routledge.

Charter

Ussher

J. M.

Perz

Robinson

(2018). The transgender parent: Experiences and constructions of pregnancy and parenthood for transgender men in Australia. International Journal of Transgenderism, 19(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1399496

10.

Cuboniks

(2018). The xenofeminist manifesto: A politics for alienation. Verso Books.

11.

Darwin

(2022). The origin of species. Fall River Press.

12.

Del Savio

Cavaliere

(2016). The problem with commercial surrogacy: A reflection on reproduction, markets and labour. BioLaw Journal-Rivista di BioDiritto, (2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.15168/2284-4503-154

13.

D’Emilio

(2007). Capitalism and gay identity. In Culture, society and sexuality (pp. 266–274). Routledge.

14.

Engels

(2001). The origin of the family, private property and the state. Wellred Books.

15.

Escalante

(2018). Beyond negativity: What comes after gender nihilism? Medium.

16.

Federici

(1975). Wages against housework. Falling Wall Press.

17.

Federici

(2004). Caliban and the witch. Autonomedia; Pluto Distributor.

18.

Finn

(2021). The philosophy of reproduction. Think, 20(59), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/s147717562100018x

19.

Firestone

(2015). The dialectic of sex. Verso Books.

20.

Generation Z’s views on generational change and the challenges and opportunities ahead: A political and cultural glimpse into America’s future. (2024). PRRI.

21.

Gimenez

(2018). Reproduction and procreation under capitalism: A marxist-feminist analysis. In Marx women and capitalist social reproduction: Marxist feminist essays. Brill.

22.

Gleeson

J. J.

(2017). Transition and abolition: Notes on marxism and trans politics. Viewpoint Magazine, 19.

23.

Global Breastfeeding Scorecard (2019). Increasing commitment to breastfeeding through funding and improved policies and programmes. World Health Organization.

24.

Hack

Horbar

J. D.

Malloy

M. H.

Tyson

J. E.

Wright

(1991). Very low birth weight outcomes of the national institute of child health and human development neonatal network. Pediatrics, 87(5), 587–597.

25.

Hamilton

B. E.

Joyce

A. M.

Ventura

S. J.

(2012). Births: Preliminary data for 2011. National Vital Statistics Reports, 61(5), 1–18.

26.

Haraway

(2013). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In The transgender studies reader (pp. 103–118). Routledge.

27.

Haslanger

(2000). Gender and race: (What) are they? (What) do we want them to Be? Noûs, 34(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.00201

28.

Hegel

G. W. F.

Miller

A. V.

Findlay

J. N.

(1976). Phenomenology of spirit.

29.

Hennessy

(2017). Profit and pleasure: Sexual identities in late capitalism. Routledge.

30.

James

(1994). Marx and feminism. Crossroad Books.

31.

Jeffreys

(1997). Transgender activism: A lesbian feminist perspective. Journal of Lesbian Studies, 1(3–4), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1300/j155v01n03_03

32.

Jütte

(2008). Contraception: A history. Polity.

33.

Karkowsky

C. E.

(2020). Pregnant women in hospitals can get excellent treatment but terrible care. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/pregnant-women-hospitals-can-get-excellent-treatment-terrible-care-ncna1165411

34.

Keeler

E. B.

Brodie

(1993). Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. The Milbank Quarterly, 71(3), 365–404.

35.

Lee

G. Y.

Kisilevsky

B. S.

(2014). Fetuses respond to father’s voice but prefer mother’s voice after birth. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.21084

36.

Lewis

(2021). Full surrogacy now: Feminism against family. Verso Books.

37.

MacKinnon

C. A.

(2023). Exploring transgender law and politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

38.

Mahmoud

Romanis

E. C.

(2023). On gestation and motherhood. Medical Law Review, 31(1), 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwac030

39.

Marinelli

Del Rio

Straccamore

Negro

Basile

(2022). The armed conflict in Ukraine and the risks of inter-country surrogacy: The unsolved dilemma. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 26(16), 5646–5650. https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202208_29497

40.

Marx

Engels

(1978). In Tucker

Robert C.

(Ed.), The Marx-Engels Reader (2nd ed., pp. 66–125). New York: Norton.

41.

Metcalfe

(2021). Cosmos against nature in the class struggle of proletarian trans women. In Transgender marxism. Pluto Press.

42.

Morgan

L. H.

(1964). Ancient society. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

43.

Obedin-Maliver

Makadon

H. J.

(2016). Transgender men and pregnancy. Obstetric Medicine, 9(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495X15612658

44.

Okin

S. M.

(1989). Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books.

45.

Oksala

(2019). Feminism against biocapitalism: Gestational surrogacy and the limits of the labor paradigm. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 44(4), 883–904. https://doi.org/10.1086/702031

46.

O'Reilly

(Ed.), (2012). From motherhood to mothering: The legacy of Adrienne Rich’s of woman born. State University of New York Press.

47.

Oster

McClelland

W. S.

(2019). Why the C-section rate is so high. The Atlantic.

48.

Pearce

Moon

Gupta

Steinberg

D. L.

(Eds.), (2019). The emergence of trans: Cultures, politics and everyday lives. Routledge.

49.

Raymond

(1994). The transsexual empire: The making of the she-male. Teachers College Press.

50.

Rich

(2021). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. W. W. Norton.

51.

Roth

(2017). (Queer) family values and 'reciprocal IVF': What difference does sexual identity make? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27(3), 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2017.0034

52.

Rothman

B. K.

(1986). The tentative pregnancy: Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. Viking.

53.

Rothman

B. K.

(1987). Comment on harrison: The commodification of motherhood. Gender & Society, 1(3), 312–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124387001003006

54.

Rothman

B. K.

(2000). Recreating motherhood. Rutgers University Press.

55.

Rothman

B. K.

(2021). The biomedical empire: Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Stanford University Press.

56.

Rudrappa

(2018). Reproducing dystopia: The politics of transnational surrogacy in India, 2002–2015. Critical Sociology, 44(7–8), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517740616

57.

Schurr

Militz

(2018). The affective economy of transnational surrogacy. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1626–1645. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x18769652

58.

Sparrow

(2008). Is it ‘every man’s right to have babies if he wants them’? Male pregnancy and the limits of reproductive liberty. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 18(3), 275–299. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0198

59.

Taffel

S. M.

Placek

P. J.

Liss

(1987). Trends in the United States cesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise. American Journal of Public Health, 77(8), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.77.8.955

60.

Timpanaro

(1975). On materialism. Humanities Press.

61.

Vogel

(2013). Marxism and the oppression of women: Toward a unitary theory. In Marxism and the oppression of women (pp. 1–20). Brill.

62.

Wax

J. R.

Cartin

Pinette

M. G.

Blackstone

(2004). Patient choice cesarean: An evidence-based review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 59(8), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000133942.76239.57

63.

Wolf

J. H.

(2018). Risk and reputation: Obstetricians, cesareans, and consent. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 73(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrx053