Based on an ethnographic study with 58 participants released from a Romanian prison, this study revisits the pains of release and illustrates the complexity of the reentry process. Some of the pains of reentry seem universal while others seem to be context dependent. In the same time, some pains of release are personal, others social, while others are structural. Concepts of intersectionality and the multi-level model of reentry are discussed, and further suggestions for research are advanced.
AllenderD. M. (2004). Offender reentry: A returning or reformed criminal?FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, 73(12), 1-11.
2.
ArmstrongR.DurnescuI. (Eds.). (2016). Parole and beyond: International experiences of life after prison. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
3.
BahnC.DavisL. (1991). Social-psychological effects of the status of probationer. Federal Probation, 55, 17-25.
4.
BosworthM. (2007). Creating the responsible prisoner: Federal admission and orientation packs. Punishment & Society, 9, 67-85.
5.
ChadwickK.ScratonP. (2006). Criminalization. In McLaughlinE.MuncieJ. (Eds). The Sage dictionary of criminology (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
6.
CrawleyE.SparksR. (2006). Is there life after imprisonment? How elderly men talk about imprisonment and release. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 6, 63-82.
7.
CullenF. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences. Justice Quarterly, 11, 527-559.
8.
DurnescuI. (2011). Pains of probation: Effective practice and human rights. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 530-545.
9.
DurnescuI.EnenglC.GraflC. (2013). Experiencing supervision. In McNeillF.BeyensK. (Eds.), Offender supervision in Europe (pp. 19-50). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10.
DurnescuI.KennefickL.SucicI.Glavak TkalicR. (2018). Experiencing offender supervision in Europe: The Eurobarometer-Lessons from the pilot study. Probation Journal, 65, 7-26.
11.
DurnescuI.LazarC.ShawR. (2002). Incidence and characteristics of Roma men in Romanian prisons. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41, 237-244.
12.
DurnescuI. (forthcoming). Work as a drama. The experience of former prisoners on the labour market.
13.
FletcherD. R. (2001). Ex-offenders, the labour market and the new public administration. Public Administration, 79, 871-891.
14.
FunkP. (2004). On the effective use of stigma as a crime deterrent. European Economic Review, 48, 715-728.
15.
GlaserD. (1969). The effectiveness of a prison and parole system (Abridged.). New York, NY: Bobbs-Merrill.
HalseyM.ArmstrongR.WrightS. (2017). “F*ck It!”: Matza and the mood of fatalism in the desistance process. The British Journal of Criminology, 57, 1041-1060.
18.
HayesD. (2015). The impact of supervision on the pains of community penalties in England and Wales: An exploratory study. European Journal of Probation, 7, 85-102.
19.
HayesD. (2018). Experiencing penal supervision: A literature review. Probation Journal, 65, 378-393.
20.
HörnqvistM. (2007). The organized nature of power: Four case studies on the current use of repressive and productive interventions based on considerations of risk and need (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
IrwinJ. (1970). The Felon. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
JeffersonA. M. (2016). Exacerbating deprivation: Trajectories of confinement in Sierra Leone. In ArmstrongR.DurnescuI. (Eds.), Parole and beyond: International experiences of life after prison (pp. 243-269). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
24.
LeBelT. P. (2012). Invisible stripes? Formerly incarcerated person’s perceptions of stigma. Deviant Behavior, 33, 89-107.
25.
LevensonJ. S.HernA. L. (2007). Sex offender residence restrictions: Unintended consequences and community reentry. Justice Research and Policy, 9(1), 59-74.
26.
MoranD. (2012). Prisoner reintegration and the stigma of prison time inscribed on the body. Punishment & Society, 14, 564-583. doi:10.1177/1462474512464008
27.
NaginD.WaldfogelJ. (1993, November). The effect of conviction on income through the life cycle. National Bureau of Economic Research Inc. (NBER Working Paper Series No. 4551)
RosenfeldR.WallmanJ.FornangoR. (2005). The contribution of ex-prisoners to crime rates. In TravisJ.VisherC. A. (Eds.), Prisoner reentry and crime in America (pp. 80-104). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
SchinkelM. (2016). Experiences of parole in Scotland: Stalled lives. In ArmstrongR.DurnescuI. (Eds.), Parole and beyond: International experiences of life after prison (pp. 219-242). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
33.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1972). Learned helplessness. Annual Review of Medicine, 23, 407-412.
34.
ShammasV. L. (2014). The pains of freedom: Assessing the ambiguity of Scandinavian penal exceptionalism on Norway’s prison Island. Punishment & Society, 16, 104-123.
35.
ShaplandJ.SorbyA.FarrallS.PrideC. (2016). Experiencing supervision in England—On licence and on community sentences. In ArmstrongR.DurnescuI. (Eds.), Parole and beyond: International experiences of life after prison (pp. 19-48). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
36.
StandingG. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London, England: Bloomsbury.
37.
SykesG. (1958). The Society of Captives A Study of Maximum Security Prisons. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
38.
ThiemeT. (2017). The hustle economy: Informality, uncertainty and the geographies of getting by. Progress in Human Geography, 42, 529-548. doi:10.1177/0309132517690039
39.
WerthR. (2011). I do what I’m told, sort of: Reformed subjects, unruly citizens, and parole. Theoretical Criminology, 16, 329-346.
40.
WerthR. (2017). Individualizing risk: Moral judgement, professional knowledge and affect in parole evaluations. British Journal of Criminology, 57, 808-827.
41.
WinnickT. A.BodkinM. (2008). Anticipated stigma and stigma management among those to be labeled “ex-con. Deviant Behavior, 29, 295-333.
