Many offenders with a substance use disorder (SUD) do not enter addiction treatment. The aim of this study was to examine predictors of addiction treatment entry and to get more insight in the predictive value of treatment motivation. A total of 83 male offenders with a SUD under probation supervision in the Netherlands were assessed at the start of probation supervision and at 12-month follow-up. A total of 38 offenders (45.5%) entered addiction treatment in the follow-up period. Offenders with any mandated treatment (p = .028) and higher treatment motivation (p = .005) were more likely to enter treatment. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that treatment motivation predicts addiction treatment entry in the first year of probation (OR = 2.215, p < .01). This emphasizes the relevance of treatment motivation for addiction treatment entry among offenders with a SUD. Pretreatment motivational interventions are therefore recommended for offenders with low motivation for treatment in probation settings.
AnstissB.PolaschekD. L. L.WilsonM. (2011). A brief motivational interviewing intervention with prisoners: When you lead a horse to water, can it drink for itself?Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 689-710. doi:10.1080/10683160903524325
2.
BelenkoS.HillerM.HamiltonL. (2013). Treating substance use disorders in the criminal justice system. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15(11), Article 414. doi:10.1007/s11920-013-0414-z
3.
BennettT.HollowayK.FarringtonD. (2008). The statistical association between drug misuse and crime: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 107-118. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.02.001
4.
ChandlerR. K.FletcherB. W.VolkowN. D. (2009). Treating drug abuse and addiction in the criminal justice system. Journal of the American Medical Association, 301, 183-190. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.976
5.
De LeonG.MelnickG.ThomasG.KresselD.WexlerH. K. (2000). Motivation for treatment in a prison-based therapeutic community. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 26, 33-46. doi:10.1081/ADA-100100589
6.
De Weert-Van OeneG. H.SchippersG. M.De JongC. A. J.SchrijversG. A. J. (2002). Motivation for treatment in substance dependent patients: Psychometric evaluation of the TCU-Motivation for treatment scales. European Addiction Research, 8, 2-9.
7.
FarabeeD.PrendergastM.CartierJ.WexlerH.KnightD. K.AnglinM. D. (1999). Barriers to implementing effective correctional drug treatment programs. The Prison Journal, 79, 150-162. doi:10.1177/0032885599079002002
8.
FearnN. E.VaughnM. G.NelsonE. J.Salas-WrightC. P.QianZ.QianZ. (2016). Trends and correlates of substance use disorders among probationers and parolees in the United States, 2002 – 2014. Drug Alcohol Dependence, 167, 128-139. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.003
9.
FloreD.BoslyS.HonhonA.MaggioJ. (2012). Probation measures and alternative sanctions in the European Union (FloreD.BoslyS.HonhonA.MaggioJ., Eds.). Cambridge, UK: Intersentia. Retrieved from http://www.euprobationproject.eu/national_detail.php?c=NL
10.
GottfredsonD. C.KearleyB. W.BushwayS. D. (2008). Substance use, drug treatment, and crime : An examination of intra -individual variation in a drug court population. Journal of Drug Issues, 38, 601-630. doi: 10.1177/002204260803800211
11.
HarveyE.ShakeshaftA.HetheringtonK.SannibaleC.MattickR. P. (2007). The efficacy of diversion and aftercare strategies for adult drug-involved offenders: A summary and methodological review of the outcome literature. Drug and Alcohol Review, 26, 379-387. doi:10.1080/09595230701373917
12.
HosmerD. W.LemeshowS. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley. doi:10.1002/0471722146
13.
JonesA.HayhurstK. P.MillarT. (2017). Levels of motivation and readiness for treatment aligned with criminal justice referral and coercion among substance users in England. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78, 884-888. doi:10.15288/jsad.2017.78.884
14.
KlagS.O’CallaghanF.CreedP. (2005). The use of legal coercion in the treatment of substance abusers: An overview and critical analysis of thirty years of research. Substance Use & Misuse, 40, 1777-1795. doi:10.1080/10826080500260891
15.
KoehlerJ. A.HumphreysD. K.AkoensiT. D.SánchezdeRiberaO.LöselF. (2014). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of European drug treatment programmes on reoffending. Psychology, Crime & Law, 20, 584-602. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2013.804921
16.
Linn-WaltonR.MaschiT. (2015). Insight, motivation and outcome in drug treatment for offenders: A review of the recent literature. Journal of Addiction Research & Therapy, 6(1), Article 210. doi:10.4172/2155-6105.1000210
17.
LuborskyL.MclellanA. T.WoodyG. E.O’BrienC. P.AuerbachA. (1985). Therapist success and its determinants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 602-611. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790290084010
18.
MarshallL. E.MouldenH. M. (2006). Preparatory programs for sexual offenders. In MarshallW. L.FernandezY. M.MarshallL. E.SerranG. A. (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment: Controversial issues (pp. 199-210). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
19.
MelnickG.De LeonG.ThomasG.KresselD.WexlerH. K. (2001). Treatment process in prison therapeutic communities: Motivation, participation, and outcome. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 27, 633-650. doi:10.1081/ADA-100107660
20.
MelnickG.HawkeJ.De LeonG. (2014). Motivation and readiness for drug treatment: Differences by modality and special populations. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 33, 134-147. doi:10.1080/10550887.2014.909700
21.
MillerW. R. (1985). Motivation for treatment. A review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 84-107. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.84
22.
NajavitsL. M.WeissR. D. (1994). Variations in therapist effectiveness in the treatment of patients with substance use disorders: An empirical review. Addiction, 89, 679-688. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb00954.x
23.
OlverM. E.StockdaleK. C.WormithJ. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6-21. doi:10.1037/a0022200
24.
OpsalA.KristensenØ.VederhusJ. K.ClausenT. (2016). Perceived coercion to enter treatment among involuntarily and voluntarily admitted patients with substance use disorders. BMC Health Services Research, 16, Article 656. doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1906-4
25.
PrendergastM.GreenwellL.FarabeeD.HserY.-I. (2009). Influence of perceived coercion and motivation on treatment completion and re-arrest among substance-abusing offenders. The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 36, 159-176. doi:10.1007/s11414-008-9117-3
26.
PrendergastM.PearsonF. S.PodusD.HamiltonZ. K.GreenwellL. (2013). The Andrews’ principles of risk, needs, and responsivity as applied in drug treatment programs: Meta-analysis of crime and drug use outcomes. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 9, 275-300. doi:10.1007/s11292-013-9178-z
27.
PrendergastM.PodusD.ChangE.UradaD. (2002). The effectiveness of drug abuse treatment: A meta-analysis of comparison group studies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 67, 53-72. doi:10.1016/S0376-8716(02)00014-5
28.
SchippersG.BroekmanT.BuckholzA. (2011). MATE 2.1 Manual and protocol. Dutch editing. In SchippersG. M.BroekmanT. G. (Eds.), MATE 2.1. Manual and protocol (pp. 1-99). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Bêta Boeken. Retrieved from http://www.mateinfo.eu/pubs/MATE-nl2.1 Manual and Protocol-D.pdf
29.
SchippersG. M.BroekmanT. G.BuchholzA.KoeterM. W. J.Van Den BrinkW. (2010). Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE): An instrument based on the World Health Organization family of international classifications. Addiction, 105, 862-871. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02889.x
30.
ShaulL.KoeterM. W. J.SchippersG. M. (2016). Brief motivation enhancing intervention to prevent criminal recidivism in substance-abusing offenders under supervision: A randomized trial. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22, 903-914. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2016.1202248
31.
TaxmanF. S. (2014). Building effective service delivery mechanisms for justice-involved individuals: An under-researched area. Health & Justice, 2(2), Article 2. doi:10.1186/2194-7899-2-2
32.
TaxmanF. S.MarloweD. B. (2006). Risk, needs, responsivity: In action or inaction?Crime & Delinquency, 52, 3-6. doi:10.1177/0011128705281757
33.
TaxmanF. S.PerdoniM. L.HarrisonL. D. (2007). Drug treatment services for adult offenders: The state of the state. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32, 239-254. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.019
Van KalmthoutA.TiggesL. (2008). Probation in Europe. In Van KalmthoutA. M.DurnescuI. (Eds.), Probation in Europe: A European perspective (pp. 381-416). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Wolf Legal Productions. Retrieved from http://www.ejprob.ro/uploads_ro/681/book1.pdf
36.
WhiteH. R.GormanD. M. (2000). Dynamics of the drug-crime relationship. Criminal Justice, 1, 151-218.
37.
WildT. C. (2006). Social control and coercion in addiction treatment: Towards evidence-based policy and practice. Addiction, 101, 40-49. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01268.x
