This paper builds on previous geographical and social science work at the boundaries of climate change by (re)asserting the significance of the territoriality of the national state in global climate negotiations. Using the post-political consensus as a theoretical framework and drawing upon examples from climate change negotiations like Kyoto and Copenhagen, it argues that it is too premature to fetishize the consensus of, and collectivism between, national states in global climate politics. As geographers, ‘territoriality’, both as a material and discursive device, is fundamental in, and constitutive of, how we interpret and understand climate change and the politics thereof.
AdgerWN (2001) Scales of governance and environmental justice for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. Journal of International Development13(7): 921–931.
2.
AdgerWNArnellNWTompkinsEL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environmental Change15(2): 77–86.
3.
AgnewJC (1994) The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy1(1): 53–80.
4.
AgnewJCCorbridgeS (1995) Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy. London: Routledge.
5.
AllenJ (2008) Pragmatism and power, or the power to make a difference in a radically contingent world. Geoforum39(4): 1613–1624.
AndersonB (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.
8.
AntonsichM (2009) On territory, the nation-state and the crisis of the hyphen. Progress in Human Geography33(6): 789–806.
9.
AppaduraiA (2003) Sovereignty without territoriality: Notes for a postnational geography. In: LowSMLawrence-ZúñigaD (eds) The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 337–350.
10.
ArquillaJRonfeldtD (1999) The Emergence of Noopolitik: Toward an American Information Strategy. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
11.
AspinallR (2010) Geographical perspectives on climate change. Annals of the Association of American Geographers100(4): 715–718.
12.
BaileyI (2008) Geographical work at the boundaries of climate policy: A commentary and complement to Mike Hulme. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(3): 420–423.
13.
BaileyI (2010) Copenhagen and the new political geographies of climate change. Political Geography29(3): 127–129.
14.
BaranzaniAGoldembergJSpeckS (2000) A future for carbon taxes. Ecological Economics32(3): 395–412.
15.
BarryA (2002) The anti-political economy. Economy and Society31(2): 268–284.
BeckU (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: SAGE.
21.
BeckU (1994) The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In: BeckUGiddensALashS (eds) Reflexive Modernisation: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press: 1–55.
22.
BeckU (1997) The Reinvention of Politics: Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BoykoffMTGoodmanMK (2009) Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the ‘celebritization’ of climate change. Geoforum40(3): 395–406.
27.
BreidenichCMagrawDRowleyARubinJW (1998) The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The American Journal of International Law92(2): 315–331.
28.
BrennerN (1998) Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space16(4): 459–481.
29.
BulkeleyHBetsillMM (2003) Cities and Climate Change: Urban Sustainability and Global Environmental Governance. New York: Routledge.
30.
CaneyS (2010) Markets, morality and climate change: What, if anything, is wrong with emissions trading?New Political Economy15(2): 197–224.
31.
CastellsM (1996) The Information Age, Volume I: The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
CoxHM (2010) What are we doing about climate change?Human Geography3(1): 1–26.
33.
CoxK (2002) Political Geography: Territory, State and Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
34.
DelaneyD (2005) Territory: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
35.
DemerittD (2001) The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Annals of the Association of American Geographers91(2): 307–337.
36.
DemerittDLivermanDHulmeM (2010) Book review symposium: Hulme M (2009) Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction, and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 432 pp. Progress in Human Geography35(1): 132–138.
EldenS (2005) Missing the point: Globalization, deterritorialization and the space of the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers30(1): 8–19.
39.
EldenS (2009) Terror and Territory: The Spatial Extent of Sovereignty. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
EldenS (2010) Land, terrain and territory. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 799–817.
41.
FinnemoreM (1996) National Interests in International Society. New York: Cornell University Press.
42.
GardinerSM (2004) Ethics and global climate change. Ethics114(3): 555–600.
43.
GarveyJ (2008) The Ethics of Climate Change: Right or Wrong in a Warming World. London: Continuum.
44.
GiddensA (2009) The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
45.
GiddensA (2010) Climate change meets geopolitical reality in Copenhagen. New Perspectives Quarterly27(2): 58–60.
46.
GottmannJ (1975) The evolution of the concept of territory. Social Science Information14(3/4): 29–47.
47.
GundersonLHHollingCS (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
48.
HamiltonS (2010) The Requiem for a Species: Why We Resist the Truth About Climate Change. London: Earthscan.
49.
HarveyD (1982) The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell.
HowarthNAAFoxallA (2010) The veil of Kyoto and the politics of greenhouse gas emission in Australia. Political Geography29(3): 167–176.
52.
HulmeM (2008a) Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(1): 5–11.
53.
HulmeM (2008b) Governing and adapting to climate. A response to Ian Bailey’s Commentary on ‘Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change’. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers33(3): 424–427.
54.
HulmeM (2009) Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction, and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
HulmeM (2010) Cosmopolitan climates: Hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory, Culture and Society27(2–3): 267–276.
56.
HulmeMMahonyM (2010) Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC?Progress in Physical Geography34(5): 705–718.
57.
JasanoffS (2010) A new climate for society. Theory, Culture and Society27(2–3): 233–253.
58.
JessopBBrennerNJonesM (2008) Theorizing sociospatial relations. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space26(3): 389–401.
59.
JohnstonRJ (1980) Explanation in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers5(4): 402–412.
60.
KnightDB (1982) Identity and territory: Geographical perspectives on nationalism and regionalism. Annals of the Association of American Geographers72(4): 514–531.
61.
KuehlsT (1996) Beyond Sovereign Territory: The Space of Ecopolitics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
62.
KythreotisAP (2010) Local Strategic Partnerships: A panacea for voluntary interest groups to promote local environmental sustainability? The UK context. Sustainable Development18(3): 187–193.
63.
KythreotisAPJonasAEG (forthcoming) ‘Scaling sustainability?’ How voluntary groups negotiate spaces of sustainability governance in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space30.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
66.
LefebvreH (1978) De l’Etat: Les Contradictions de l’Etat Moderne, Volume 4. Paris: Union Generale d’Editions.
67.
LeviM (2009) Copenhagen’s inconvenient truth: How to salvage the climate conference. Foreign Affairs88(5): 92–103.
68.
LevinSBarrettSAniyarSBaumolWBlissCBolinB (1998) Resilience in natural and socioeconomic systems. Environment and Development Economics3(2): 221–262.
69.
LuterbacherUSprinzDF (2001) International Relations and Global Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
70.
McKibbinWJWilcoxenPJ (2002) The role of economics in climate change policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives16(2): 107–129.
71.
MansfieldB (2007) Articulation between neoliberal and state-oriented environmental regulation: Fisheries privatization and endangered species protection. Environment and Planning A39(8): 1926–1942.
72.
MasseyD (1985) New directions in space. In: GregoryDUrryJ (eds) Social Relations and Spatial Structures. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 9–19.
73.
MasseyD (1993) Power-geometry and a progressive sense of place. In: BirdJCurtisBPutnamTRobertsonGTicknerL (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change. London: Routledge, 59–69.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political. London: Routledge.
76.
MouffeC (2009) The importance of engaging the state. In: PughJ (ed.) What is Radical Politics Today?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 230–237.
77.
NeumannR (2009) Political ecology: Theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography33(3): 398–406.
78.
NewellPPatersonM (2010) Climate Capitalism: Global Warming and the Transformation of the Global Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
79.
NewmanD (2006) The lines that continue to separate us: Borders in our ‘borderless’ world. Progress in Human Geography30(2): 143–161.
80.
NewmanDPaasiA (1998) Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: Boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography22(2): 186–207.
NorthP (2010) Eco-localisation as a progressive response to peak oil and climate change – a sympathetic critique. Geoforum41(4): 585–594.
83.
O’HaraPA (2009) Political economy of climate change, ecological destruction and uneven development. Ecological Economics69(2): 223–234.
84.
PaasiA (1998) Boundaries as social processes: Territoriality in the world of flows. Geopolitics3(1): 69–88.
85.
PaasiA (2003) Territory. In: AgnewJMitchellKÓ TuathailG (eds) A Companion to Political Geography. Oxford: Blackwell, 109–122.
86.
PaasiA (2009) Bounded spaces in a ‘borderless world’? Border studies, power, and the anatomy of the territory. Journal of Power2(2): 213–234.
87.
PaavolaJAdgerWNHuqS (2006) Multifaceted justice in adaptation to climate change. In: AdgerWNPaavolaJHuqSMaceMJ (eds) Fairness in Adaptation to Climate Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 264–278.
88.
PainterJ (2010) Rethinking territory. Antipode42(5): 1090–1118.
89.
ParksBCRobertsJT (2010) Climate change, social theory and justice. Theory, Culture and Society27(2–3): 134–166.
90.
PearceD (2003) The social cost of carbon and its policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy19(3): 362–384.
PrinsGRaynerS (2007) Time to ditch Kyoto. Nature449: 973–975.
93.
PrudhamS (2009) Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming, and the performance of green capitalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space41(7): 1594–1613.
94.
RiceJL (2010) Climate, carbon, and territory: Greenhouse gas mitigation in Seattle in Washington. Annals of the Association of American Geographers100(4): 929–937.
95.
RosenzweigCSoleckiWHammerSAMehrotraS (2010) Cities lead the way in climate-change action. Nature467: 909–911.
96.
RudolphC (2005) Sovereignty and territorial borders in a global age. International Studies Review1(1): 1–20.
97.
RuggieJG (1993) Territoriality and beyond: Problematizing modernity in international relations. International Organization47(1): 139–174.
98.
SackRD (1983) Human territoriality: A theory. Annals of the Association of American Geographers73(1): 55–74.
99.
SackRD (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SarewitzD (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy7(5): 385–403.
102.
SassenS (1996) Losing Control? Sovereignty in an Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
103.
SassenS (2006) Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
104.
SchiermeierQ (2010) The real holes in climate science. Nature463: 284–287.
105.
ShackleySWynneB (1995) Integrating knowledges for climate change: Pyramids, nets and uncertainties. Global Environmental Change5(2): 113–126.
106.
ShackleySWynneB (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: Boundary-ordering devices and authority. Science, Technology and Human Values21(3): 275–302.
107.
ShearmanDSmithJW (2007) The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
108.
SmithN (2008) Afterword to the third edition. In: SmithN (ed.) Uneven Development. London: University of Georgia Press, 239–266.
StoreyD (2001) Territory: The Claiming of Space. Harlow: Pearson.
111.
StottPAKettleboroughJA (2002) Origins and estimates of uncertainty in predictions of twenty-first century temperature rise. Nature416: 723–726.
112.
SwyngedouwE (2007) Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition. In: KruegerRGibbsD (eds) The Sustainable Development Paradox: Urban Political Economy in the United States and Europe. New York: Guilford, 13–40.
113.
SwyngedouwE (2010) Apocalypse forever? Post-political populism and the spectre of climate change. Theory, Culture and Society27(2–3): 213–232.
114.
SzerszynskiBUrryJ (2010) Changing climates: Introduction. Theory, Culture and Society27(2–3): 1–8.
115.
TaylorPJ (1982) A materialist framework for political geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers7(1): 15–34.
116.
TaylorPJ (1994) The state as container: Territoriality in the modern world-system. Progress in Human Geography18(2): 151–162.
117.
VictorDG (2001) The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
VoglerJF (2001) Future directions: The atmosphere as a global commons. Atmospheric Environment35(13): 2427–2428.
120.
VoglerJF (2005) The European contribution to global environmental governance. International Affairs81(4): 835–850.
121.
VoglerJFBrethertonC (2006) The European Union as a protagonist to the United States on climate change. International Studies Perspective7(1): 1–22.
122.
VogtC (2003) Russia’s reluctance to ratify Kyoto: an economic analysis. Intereconomics38(6): 346–349.
123.
WalkerGBulkeleyH (2006) Editorial: Geographies of environmental justice. Geoforum37(5): 655–659.
124.
WaltzKN (1979) Theory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
125.
WatersM (2001) Globalization. London: Routledge.
126.
WhalleyJWalshS (2009) Bringing the Copenhagen global climate change negotiations to conclusion. CESifo Economic Studies55(2): 255–285.
127.
WhileJJonasAEGGibbsD (2009) From sustainable development to carbon control: Eco-state restructuring and the politics of urban and regional development. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(1): 76–93.
128.
WhitmarshL (2009) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’. Public Understanding of Science18(4): 401–420.
129.
YaminFDepledgeJ (2004) The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130.
YeungH (1998) Capital, state and space: Contesting the borderless world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers23(3): 291–309.
131.
ŽižekS (1991) Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan Through Popular Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
