The pervasive and important territorial dimensions of property are understudied, given the tendency to view territory through the lens of the state. Viewing both property and territory as relational and mutually recursive, I introduce the practical work of property’s territory, the historical moment in which it was produced, the powerful metaphors that work through it, and the habits and everyday practices it induces. The territory of property, I suggest, has a specificity, a presence, and a consequentiality, all of which demand our attention.
AlexanderG (2008) The social obligation norm in American property law. Cornell Law Review94: 745–819.
2.
AlexanderGPeñalverE (2012) An Introduction to Property Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3.
AllenJ (2008) Pragmatism and power, or the power to make a difference in a radically contingent world. Geoforum39: 1613–1624.
4.
ArdreyR (1966) The Territorial Imperative. New York: Atheneum.
5.
BabieP (2013) The spatial: A forgotten dimension of property. San Diego Law Review50(323).
6.
BakerJH (1971) An Introduction to English Legal History. London: Butterworth.
7.
BannerS (1999) Two properties, one land: Law and space in nineteenth century New Zealand. Law and Social Inquiry24(4): 807–852.
8.
BarrosDB (2006) Home as a legal concept. Santa Clara Law Review46: 255–306.
9.
BlackCF (2010) The Land is the Source of the Law: A Dialogic Encounter with Indigenous Jurisprudence. New York: Routledge.
10.
BlomleyN (1998) Landscapes of property. Law and Society Review32(3): 567–612.
11.
BlomleyN (2002) Mud for the land. Public Culture14(3): 557–582.
12.
BlomleyN (2003a) From ‘what?’ to ‘so what?’ Law and geography in retrospect. In: HolderJHarrisonC (eds) Law and Geography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–33.
13.
BlomleyN (2003b) Law, property, and the spaces of violence: The frontier, the survey, and the grid. Annals, Association of American Geographers93(1): 121–141.
14.
BlomleyN (2004a) Un-real estate: Proprietary space and public gardening. Antipode36(4): 614–641.
15.
BlomleyN (2004b) Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge
16.
BlomleyN (2005a) The borrowed view: Privacy, propriety, and the entanglements of property. Law and Social Inquiry30(4): 617–661.
17.
BlomleyN (2005b) Flowers in the bathtub: Boundary crossings at the public-private divide. Geoforum36(3): 281–296.
18.
BlomleyN (2007) Making private property: Enclosure, common right and the work of hedges. Rural History18(1): 1–21.
19.
BlomleyN (2009) Homelessness, rights and the delusions of property. Urban Geography30(6): 577–590.
20.
BlomleyN (2011) Cuts, flows, and the geographies of property. Law, Culture and the Humanities7(2): 203–216.
21.
BlomleyN (2013) Performing property, making the world. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence27(1): 23–48.
22.
BlomleyN (2014a) Property, law, space. Property Law Review3: 229–235.
23.
BlomleyN (2014b) Disentangling property, performing space. In: Rose-RedwoodRGlassM (eds) Performativity, Politics, and the Production of Social Space. New York: Routledge, 147–175.
24.
BlomleyN (2014c) The ties that blind: making fee simple in the BC treaty process. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40(2): 168–179.
25.
BlomleyN (2014d) Learning from Larry: pragmatism and the habits of legal space. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 77–94.
26.
BlomleyN (2015) ‘Land use’ and the ‘difficult character of property’. Unpublished paper.
27.
BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (2014) Introduction: Expanding the spaces of law. In: BravermanIBlomleyNDelaneyDKedarA (eds) The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28.
BrighentiAM (2006) On territory as relationship and law as territory. Canadian Journal of Law and Society21(2): 65–86.
29.
BrighentiAM (2010a) On territorology: Towards a general science of territory. Theory, Culture & Society27(1): 52–72.
30.
BrighentiAM (2010b) Lines, barred lines: Movement, territory and the law. International Journal of Law in Context6(3): 217–227.
31.
CohenMR (1927) Property and sovereignty. Cornell Law Quarterly13: 8–30.
32.
CorreiaD (2013) Properties of Violence: Law and Land Grant Struggle in Northern New Mexico. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
33.
CresswellT (1996) In Place/Out of Place: Geography, Ideology and Transgression. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
DahlmanC (2009) Territory. In: GallaherCDahlmanCTGilmartinMMountzAShirlowP (eds) Key Concepts in Political Geography. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
35.
DelaneyD (2005) Territory: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
36.
EldenS (2005) Missing the point: Globalization, deterritorialization, and the space of the world. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 30: 8–19.
37.
EldenS (2010) Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography34(6): 799–817.
38.
EldenS (2013a) The Birth of Territory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
39.
EldenS (2013b) How should we do the history of territory?Territory, Politics, Governance1(1): 5–20.
40.
FergusonAG (2014) Personal curtilage: Fourth Amendment security in public. William and Mary Law Review55(4): 1283–364.
41.
GrahamN (2011) Lawscape: Property, Environment, Law. New York: Routledge.
42.
GrayKGraySF (1998) The idea of property in land. In: BrightSDewarJ (eds) Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 16–51.
43.
GurneyCM (1999) Lowering the drawbridge: a case study of analogy and metaphor in the social construction of home-ownership. Urban Studies36(10): 1705–1722.
44.
GriffinC (2010) Becoming private property: Custom, law, and the geographies of ‘ownership’ in 18th- and 19th-century England. Environment and Planning A42(3): 747–762.
45.
HafetzJL (2002) ‘A man’s home is his castle?’: Reflections on the home, the family, and privacy during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. William and Mary Journal of Women and the Law8: 175–242.
46.
HallD (2013) Land. Cambridge: Polity.
47.
HartmannL (1985) The tree tenure factor in agroforestry with particular reference to Africa. Agroforestry Systems2: 229–251.
48.
HarrisC (1993) The Lower Mainland, 1820–81. In: WynnGOkeT (eds) Vancouver and Its Region. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 38–68.
49.
HartlibS (1653) A discoverie for division or setting out of land…. London: Printed for Richard Wodenothe.
50.
HohfeldW (1913) Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. The Yale Law Journal23(1): 16–59.
51.
KainRJPBaigentE (1992) The Cadastral Map in the Service of the State: A History of Property Mapping. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
KeenanS (2010) Subversive property: Reshaping malleable spaces of belonging. Social and Legal Studies19(4): 423–439.
53.
KellyDB (2014) The right to include. Emory Law Journal63: 857–924.
54.
KingP (1989) Gleaners, farmers and the failure of legal sanctions in England 1750-1850. Past & Present125: 116–150.
55.
LefebvreH (1991) The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
LiTM (2014) What is land? Assembling a resource for global investment. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39: 589–602.
57.
MaandiP (2009) The silent articulation of private land rights in Soviet Estonia: A geographical perspective. Geoforum40: 454–464.
58.
MacphersonCB (ed.) (1972) Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
59.
McClainL (1995) Inviolability and privacy: The castle, the sanctuary and the body. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities7(2): 195–242.
60.
MerrillTW (1998) Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review77: 730–754.
61.
MerrillTWSmithHE (2001) What happened to property in law and economics?The Yale Law Journal111(2): 357–398.
62.
MitchellD (1996) The Lie of the Land. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
63.
MitchellDStaeheliL (2005) Turning social relations into space: Property, law, and the plaza of Sante Fe, New Mexico. Landscape Research30(3): 361–378.
64.
NedelskyJ (1989) Reconceiving autonomy: Some thoughts and possibilities. Yale Journal of Law and Feminism1: 6–36.
65.
NedelskyJ (1990) Law, boundaries and the bounded self. Representations30: 162–189.
66.
NineC (2008) A Lockean theory of territory. Political Studies56: 148–165.
67.
OjalammiSBlomleyM (2015) Dances with wolves: Making legal territory in a more-than-human world. Geoforum62: 51–60.
68.
OlwigK (2002) Landscape, Nature, and the Body Politic. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
69.
OvertonM (1996) Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy 1500–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70.
PainterJ (2010) Rethinking territory. Antipode42(5): 1090–1118.
71.
PelusoN (1996) Fruit trees and family trees in an anthropogenic forest: Ethics of access, property zones, and environmental change in Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History38(3): 510–548.
72.
PelusoN (2005) Seeing property in land use: Local territorializations in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Danish Journal of Geography105(1): 1–15.
73.
PenalverE (2005) Property as entrance. Virginia Law Review91(8): 1889–1972.
74.
PiersonC (2013) Just Property: A History in the Latin West, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75.
RobertsonM (1995) Property and ideology. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence8(2): 275–296.
76.
RoseC (1994) Property and Persuasion: Essays on the History, Theory and Rhetoric of Ownership. Boulder: Westview Press.
77.
RosenweinBH (1999) Negotiating Space: Power, Restraint, and Privileges of Immunity in Early Medieval Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
78.
RueckD (2014) Commons, enclosure, and resistance in Kahnaw:ke Mohawak territory. The Canadian Historical Review95(3): 352–381.
79.
SackRD (1986) Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80.
SeippD (1994) The concept of property in the early common law. Law and History Review12(1): 29–91.
81.
SeippD (1996) Symposium: The distinction between crime and tort in the early common law. Boston University Law Review76: 59–87.
82.
SingerJ (2000) Entitlement: The Paradoxes of Property. New Haven: Yale University Press.
83.
SingerJW (2006) The ownership society and takings of property: castles, investments, and just obligations. Harvard Environmental Law Review30: 309–338.
84.
SingerJ (2008) Things that we would like to take for granted: Minimum standards for the legal framework of a free and democratic society. Harvard Law and Policy Review2: 139–159.
85.
SmithH (2014) The thing about exclusion. Brigham-Kanner Property Rights Conference Journal (Harvard Law Working Paper No. 14–26).
86.
SteinbergT (1995) Slide Mountain: Or, the Folly of Owning Nature. Berkeley: University of California Press.
87.
StoreyD (2012) Territories: The Claiming of Space. Abingdon: Routledge.
88.
SukJ (2008) Taking the home. Law and Literature20(3): 291–317.
89.
ThomB (2009) The paradox of boundaries in Coast Salish territories. Cultural Geographies16: 179–205.
90.
ThompsonR (2007) Cultural models and shoreline social conflict. Coastal Management35(2): 211–237.
91.
WoodwardDLewisGM (1998) Introduction. In: WoodwardDLewisFM (eds) The History of Cartography, Vol. 2, Book 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1–10.
92.
ZickT (2006) Speech and spatial tactics. Texas Law Review84(3): 581–651.
