The purpose of this study is to develop a phenomenological model for prediction of the entire forming limit diagram from simple tensile material properties. The phenomenological model is based on the necking and ductile damage theories. In the proposed model, void nucleation is described as a function of the equivalent plastic strain, and void growth is a function of the stress triaxiality. The forming limit curves calculated from the proposed phenomenological model matched reasonably well in the region of uniaxial tension to balance biaxial tension with the experimental forming limit curves generated on C-Mn 440 steel, interstitial-free 340 steel, and interstitial-free steel sheets.
HutchinsonJWNealeKWNeedlemanA. Sheet necking: II. Time-independent behavior. In: KoistinenDPWangNM (eds) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. New York: Plenum, 1978, pp.111–126.
8.
HutchinsonJWNealeKWNeedlemanA. Sheet necking: III. Strain-rate effects. In: KoistinenDPWangNM (eds) Mechanics of sheet metal forming. New York: Plenum, 1978, pp.269–283.
9.
MarciniakZKuczynskiK. Limit strains in the processes of stretch-forming sheet metal. Int J Mech Sci1967; 9: 609–620.
10.
ChowCLTaiWHChuE. Computer simulation of sheet metal forming based on damage mechanics approach. J Mater Process Tech2003; 139: 553–558.
11.
PaulSK. Theoretical analysis of strain and stress based forming limit diagrams. J Strain Anal Eng2013; 48(3): 177–188.
12.
GhazanfariAAssempourA. Calibration of forming limit diagrams using a modified Marciniak–Kuczynski model and an empirical law. Mater Design2012; 34: 185–191.
13.
TakudaHMoriKHattaN. The application of some criteria for ductile fracture to the prediction of the forming limit of sheet metals. J Mater Process Tech1999; 95: 116–121.
14.
LouYHuhHLimS. New ductile fracture criterion for prediction of fracture forming limit diagrams of sheet metals. Int J Solids Struct2012; 49(25): 3605–3615.
15.
NakazimaKKikuumaTHasukaK. Study on the formability of steel sheets. Yawata technical report no. 264, 1968, pp.141–154.
16.
HeckerSS. Simple technique for determining forming limit curves. Sheet Metal Ind1975; 5: 671–676.
17.
DjavanroodiFDerogarA. Experimental and numerical evaluation of forming limit diagram for Ti6Al4V titanium and Al6061-T6 aluminum alloys sheets. Mater Design2010; 31: 4866–4875.
18.
KeelerSPBrazierWG. Relationship between laboratory material properties and press shop formability. In: Proceedings of conference on microalloy, 1977, vol. 75, pp.517–528.
19.
ZadpoorAASinkeJBenedictusR. Formability prediction of high strength aluminum sheets. Int J Plasticity2009; 25: 2269–2297.
20.
StoughtonTBZhuX. Review of theoretical models of the strain-based FLD and their relevance to the stress-based FLD. Int J Plasticity2004; 20: 1463–1486.
21.
RaghavanKS. A simple technique to generate in-plane forming limit curves and selected applications. Metall Trans A1995; 26: 2075–2084.
22.
BandstraJPGotoDMKossDA. Ductile failure as a result of a void-sheet instability: experiment and computational modeling. Mat Sci Eng A: Struct1998; 249(1–2): 46–54.
23.
BonoraNGentileDPirondiA. Ductile damage evolution under triaxial state of stress: theory and experiments. Int J Plasticity2005; 21(5): 981–1007.
24.
GursonAL. Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth. Part I: yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. J Eng Mater: T ASME1977; 99: 2–15.
25.
TvergaardVNeedlemanA. Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metall1984; 32: 157–169.
26.
McClintockFA. A criterion of ductile fracture by the growth of holes. J Appl Mech: T ASME1968; 35: 363–371.
27.
LiHFuMWLuJ. Ductile fracture: experiments and computations. Int J Plasticity2011; 27: 147–180.
28.
León-GarcíaOPetrovRKestensLAI. Void initiation at TiN precipitates in IF steels during tensile deformation. Mat Sci Eng A: Struct2010; 527(16–17): 4202–4209.
29.
NarayanasamyRSathiya NarayananC. Forming limit diagram for interstitial free steels: part I. Mat Sci Eng A: Struct2005; 399(1–2): 292–307.
30.
WeckAWilkinsonD. Experimental investigation of void coalescence in metallic sheets containing laser drilled holes. Acta Mater2008; 56: 1774–1784.
31.
BaoYBWierzbickiT. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci2004; 46: 81–98.
32.
GhoshAK. A criterion for ductile fracture in sheets under biaxial loading. Metall Trans A1976; 7: 523–533.
33.
BressanJDWilliamsJA. The use of a shear instability criterion to predict local necking in sheet metal deformation. Int J Mech Sci1983; 25: 155–168.
34.
LiYNLuoMGerlachJ. Prediction of shear-induced fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Tech2010; 210: 1858–1869.
35.
TrescaH. Mémoire sur l’écoulement des corps solides soumis à de fortes pressions. CR Acad Sci Paris1864; 59: 754.
36.
SimhaCHMGholipourJBardelcikA. Prediction of necking in tubular hydroforming using an extended stress-based FLC. J Eng Mater: T ASME2007; 129(1): 136–147.
