In this study, small punch tests are conducted to investigate the fracture behavior of 304 stainless steel using unnotched and pre-notched specimens at room temperature and deep cryogenic temperature in liquid nitrogen. The mechanical properties of the material are discussed through the force-displacement relationship. The fracture surface of the specimen after the test is observed using a scanning electron microscope to examine the fracture characteristics of the steel. The obtained results show a negative rate-sensitivity in both maximum force and displacement at maximum force at room temperature. This behavior is attributed to a mixed fracture mechanism involving both ductile and brittle failure. Meanwhile, at deep cryogenic temperature, the mechanical properties and fracture behavior of the investigated material can be improved considerably, especially at higher strain rates, with significant increases in both strength and ductility. Notably, a positive rate-sensitivity in displacement at the maximum force can be obtained from the test conducted at deep cryogenic temperature. This enhancement is likely due to the facilitated formation of martensite during the small punch test at low temperature.
ManahanMPArgonASHarlingOK.The development of a miniaturized disk bend test for the determination of postirradiation mechanical properties. J Nucl Mater1981; 104: 1545–1550.
2.
GuanKSzpunarJAWenC, et al. Investigation on the deformation and microstructure evolution of P91 steel in short-term small punch creep test. J Strain Anal Eng Des2018; 53(4): 248–254.
3.
WangZXShiHJLuJ, et al. Small punch testing for assessing the fracture properties of the reactor vessel steel with different thicknesses. Nucl Eng Des2008; 238: 3186–3193.
4.
LancasterRJBarnardNCHaighB, et al. Evaluating the efficacy of alternative small scale test methodologies in deriving the mechanical properties of additive manufactured materials. J Mater Res Technol2023; 26: 9328–9345.
5.
PhamHTIwamotoT.An evaluation of fracture properties of type-304 austenitic stainless steel at high deformation rate using the small punch test. Int J Mech Sci2018; 144: 249–261.
6.
SimonovskiIHolmströmSBaraldiD, et al. Investigation of cracking in small punch test for semi-brittle materials. Theor Appl Fract Mech2020; 108: 102646.
7.
Sánchez-ÁvilaDBareaRMartínezE, et al. Determination of the instantaneous strain rate during small punch testing of 316 L stainless steel. Int J Mech Sci2018; 149: 93–100.
8.
JiangXBaiJGuoJ, et al. Exploring the creep and oxidation behaviors of four types of FeCrAl alloys through small punch test at 600°C: Experiments and simulations. J Mater Res Technol2023; 27: 733–756.
9.
AishwaryVPKarthikVAbdulRS, et al. Estimation of UTS from small punch test using an improved method. Int J Press Vessel Pip2022; 200: 104818.
10.
GarcíaTERodríguezCBelzunceFJ, et al. Estimation of the mechanical properties of metallic materials by means of the small punch test. J Alloys Compd2014; 582: 708–717.
11.
CalafCJBravo DíezPMPreciadoCM.Development of an improved prediction method for the yield strength of steel alloys in the small punch test. Mater Des2018; 148: 153–166.
12.
LancasterRJJeffsSPHaighBJ, et al. Derivation of material properties using small punch and shear punch test methods. Mater Des2022; 215: 110473.
13.
HolmströmSSimonovskiIBaraldiD, et al. Developments in the estimation of tensile strength by small punch testing. Theor Appl Fract Mech2019; 101: 25–34.
14.
OteroSÁlvarezGLleraMM, et al. Fatigue characterisation of structural steel by means of the small punch test: development of a methodology. Theor Appl Fract Mech2025; 135: 104772.
15.
CardenasEBelzunceFRodríguezC, et al. Application of the small punch test to determine the fracture toughness of metallic materials. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct2012; 35: 441–450.
16.
GarcíaTERodríguezCBelzunceFJ, et al. Development of a new methodology for estimating the CTOD of structural steels using the small punch test. Eng Fail Anal2015; 50: 88–99.
17.
KumarPDuttaBKChattopadhyayJ.Fracture toughness prediction of reactor grade materials using pre-notched small punch test specimens. J Nucl Mater2017; 495: 351–362.
18.
CuestaIIAlegreJM. Influence of biaxial pre-deformation on fracture properties using pre-notched small punch specimens. Eng Fract Mech2014; 131: 1–8.
19.
HurstRLiYTurbaK.Determination of fracture toughness from the small punch test using circular notched specimens. Theor Appl Fract Mech2019; 103: 102238.
20.
WangWZhongJZhangX, et al. Study of estimation of ductile-brittle transition temperature using U-notched small punch test specimens. Theor Appl Fract Mech2020; 108: 102627.
21.
Martínez-PañedaEGarcíaTERodríguezC.Fracture toughness characterization through notched small punch test specimens. Mater Sci Eng A2016; 657: 422–430.
22.
ÁlvarezGRodríguezCBelzunceFJ, et al. Use of notched small punch test specimens for the determination of fracture properties in structural steels. Theor Appl Fract Mech2020; 106: 102442.
23.
GuanKWangDDobrovskáJ, et al. Evaluation of the ductile-brittle transition temperature of anisotropic materials by small punch test with un-notched and U-notched specimens. Theor Appl Fract Mech2019; 102: 98–102.
24.
RascheSKunaM.Improved small punch testing and parameter identification of ductile to brittle materials. Int J Press Vessel Pip2015; 125: 23–34.
25.
ShindoYYamaguchiYHoriguchiK.Small punch testing for determining the cryogenic fracture properties of 304 and 316 austenitic stainless steels in a high magnetic field. Cryogenics2004; 44(11): 789–792.
26.
ChaHJeonSYoonD, et al. Evaluation of cryogenic mechanical properties of aluminum alloy using small punch test. Prog Supercond Cryog2023; 25(4): 70–74.
27.
RyuSKimYLeeS, et al. Design of a small punch test apparatus for cryogenic environments using conduction cooling. Prog Supercond Cryog2024; 26(4): 83–88.
28.
LeeKJChunMSKimMH, et al. A new constitutive model of austenitic stainless steel for cryogenic applications. Comput Mater Sci2009; 46(4): 1152–1162.
29.
ZhengCYuW.Effect of low-temperature on mechanical behavior for an AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A2018; 710: 359–365.
30.
WangHJeongYClausenB, et al. Effect of martensitic phase transformation on the behavior of 304 austenitic stainless steel under tension. Mater Sci Eng A2016; 649: 174–183.
31.
LiuXGuoYWangY, et al. Difference between thermal-induced martensite and deformation-induced martensite in 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Sci2024; 59: 21974–21986.
32.
PhamHTIwamotoT.A computational investigation on bending deformation behavior at various deflection rates for enhancement of absorbable energy in TRIP steel. Metall Mater Trans A2016; 47: 3897–3911.
33.
Fernández-PisónPRodríguez-MartínezJAGarcía-TabarésE, et al. Flow and fracture of austenitic stainless steels at cryogenic temperatures. Eng Fract Mech2021; 258: 108042.
34.
LiSWithersPJKabraS, et al. The behaviour and deformation mechanisms for 316L stainless steel deformed at cryogenic temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A2023; 880: 145279.
35.
SunilSKapoorRSinghJB.Reversion of strain induced martensite to achieve high strength and ductility in AISI 304 L. Mater Charact2023; 205: 113353.
36.
PhamHTIwamotoT.An experimental investigation on rate sensitivity of fracture mechanical characteristics in 304 austenitic stainless steel under bending deformation. ISIJ Int2015; 55: 2661–2666.
37.
PhamHTDoanTYNguyenTHN. A study on effect of heat treatment on strain-induced martensitic transformation in type-304 austenitic stainless steel. In: LongBTKimHSIshizakiK, et al. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Mechanical Engineering, Automation, and Sustainable Development 2021 (AMAS2021). Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, 2021. pp.584–591.
38.
AbendrothMKunaM.Determination of deformation and failure properties of ductile materials by means of the small punch test and neural networks. Comput Mater Sci2003; 28: 633–644.
39.
CorradoMPaggiMReinosoJ.Dynamic formulation of phase field fracture in heterogeneous media with finite thickness cohesive interfaces. Comput Mater Sci2022; 205: 111226.
