In this article, we examine the utility of Antonio Gramsci’s concept of passive revolution and its relation to Leon Trotsky’s theory of uneven and combined development in analysing the transformational effects of world economy and international relations on ‘late-developing’ societies’ transition to capitalism. Although Gramsci never explicitly linked passive revolution to uneven and combined development, we argue that Trotsky’s theory helps make explicit assumptions present in the Prison Notebooks, but never fully thematised. In turn, we demonstrate that incorporating passive revolution into Trotsky’s theory further illuminates the ontology of class agencies that is often lacking in structuralist approaches to bourgeois revolutions. In illustrating these arguments, we examine the case of Japan’s modern state-formation process, demonstrating how the Meiji Restoration of 1868 can be conceptualised as a passive revolution emerging within the context of the uneven and combined process of social development activated and generalised through the rise of the capitalist world economy.
Abu-Lughod JL ( 1989) Before European Hegemony: The World System AD 1250-1350 . Oxford: Oxford University Press .
2.
Akamatsu P. ( 1972) Meiji 1868. London: Allen & Unwin.
3.
Allinson JC, Anievas A (2009) The uses and misuses of uneven and combined development: An anatomy of a concept. Cambridge Review of International Affairs22(1): 47-67.
4.
Allinson JC, Anievas A. ( 2010) Approaching ‘the international’: Beyond political Marxism. In Anievas A (ed.) Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism. London: Routledge.
5.
Anderson P. ( 1974) Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.
6.
Anderson P. ( 1992) English Questions. London: Verso.
7.
Anderson P. ( 1996[1974]) Passages from Antiquity to Feudalism. London: Verso.
8.
Anievas A. ( 2010) The renaissance of historical materialism in international relations: An Introduction’. I Alexander Anievas (ed) Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism. London: Routledge.
9.
Arrighi G. ( 2007) Adam Smith in Beijing. Verso: London.
10.
Ashman S.(2009) Capitalism, uneven and combined development and the transhistoric. Cambridge Review of International Affairs22(1): 29-46.
11.
Barker C. ( 1978) The state as capital. International Socialism2(1): 16-42.
12.
Barker C. ( 1982) Origins and significance of the Meiji Restoration, online at <www.marxists.de>, accessed 4 November 2008.
13.
Barker C. ( 2006) Extending combined and uneven development. In Dunn B, Radice H (eds.) 100 Years of Permanent Revolution: Results and Prospects. London: Pluto Press, pp. 72-87.
14.
Barshay AE ( 2004) The Social Sciences in Modern Japan: The Marxian and Modernist Traditions (2004)Berkeley: University of California, esp. pp 31-35 and pp.72-91.
15.
Beasley WG ( 1972) The Meiji Restoration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
16.
Bix H. ( 1986) Peasant Protest in Japan, 1590-1884. New Haven: Yale.
17.
Brenner R. ( 1982) The agrarian roots ofEuropean capitalism. Past & Present97: 16-113.
18.
Buci-Glucksmann C. ( 1979) State, transition and passive revolution. In Mouffe C (ed.) Gramsci and Marxist Theory . London: Routledge.
19.
Crawcour S. ( 1974) The Tokugawa period and Japan’s preparation for modern economic growth. Journal of Japanese Studies1(1): 113-125.
20.
Day R, Gaido D (eds.) (2009) Witnesses to the Permanent Revolution: The Documentary Record. Leiden: Brill.
21.
Davidson N.(2009) Putting the nation back into the ‘international’. Cambridge Review of International Affairs22:1: 9-28.
22.
Francks P. ( 2002) Rural industry, growth linkages, and economic development in nineteenth-century Japan. Journal of Asian Studies61: 33-56.
23.
Fulcher J. ( 1988) The bureaucratization of the state and the rise of Japan . British Journal of Sociology39(2): 228-254.
24.
Gellner E. ( 1991) Plough, Sword and Book: The Structure of Human History . London: Palladin.
25.
Gramsci A. ( 1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. Hoare Q, Nowell-Smith G.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
26.
Gramsci A. ( 1977) Selections from Political Writings, 1910-1920, ed. Hoare Q, transl, Matthews J.London: Lawrence and Wishart.
27.
Halliday J. ( 1975) A Political History of Japanese Capitalism. New York: Pantheon.
28.
Hall JW ( 1955) The castle town and Japan’s modern urbanization . Far Eastern Quarterly15(1): 37-56.
29.
Hall JW ( 1970) Japan from Prehistory to Modern Times. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
30.
Harman C., Brenner R. ( 2006) The origins of capitalism. International Socialism2(111): 127-162.
31.
Havens T. ( 1974) Farm and Nation in Modern Japan: Agrarian Nationalism, 1870-1940. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
32.
Hirano Y. ( 1948) Nihon shihon-shugi-shakai no kikō [The Structure of Japanese Capitalist Society]. Tokyo: Iwaba Shoten.
33.
Hobsbawm E. ( 1975) The Age of Capital, 1848-1875. London : Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
34.
Hoston GA ( 1991) Conceptualizing bourgeois revolution: The prewar Japanese left and the Meiji Restoration. Comparative Studies in Society and History33(3): 539-81.
35.
Hoston GA ( 1986) Marxism and the Crisis of Development in Pre-War Japan . Princeton: Princeton University Press.
36.
Howell DL ( 1995) Capitalism from Within: Economy, Society, and the State in a Japanese Fishery. University of California Press, Berkeley.
37.
Howell DL ( 1998) Territoriality and collective identity in Tokugawa Japan . Daedalus127(3): 105-132.
38.
Howland DR ( 2001) Samurai status, class, and bureaucracy: A historiographical essay. Journal of Asian Studies60(2): 353-380.
39.
Ikegami E. ( 1995) The Taming of the Samurai: Honorific Individualism and the Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
Jansen MB ( 2002) The Making of Modern Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Landes D. ( 1965) Japan and Europe: Contrasts in industrialization. In Lockwood W (ed.) The State and Economic Enterprise in Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 93-182.
42.
LaFeber W. ( 1997) The Clash. London: WW Norton.
43.
Marx K. ( 1970[1859]) A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy . Moscow: Progress Publishers.
44.
Marx K. ( 1976 [1867]) Capital, Volume I. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
45.
McNeill W. ( 1984) The Pursuit of Power. Oxford: Blackwell.
46.
Moore J.r. B (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy . Boston, MA: Beacon.
47.
Morton AD ( 2007a) Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. London: Pluto.
48.
Morton AD ( 2007b) Disputing the geopolitics of the states system and global capitalism. Cambridge Review of International Affairs20(4): 599-617.
49.
Morton AD(2010) Reflections on uneven development: Mexican Revolution, primitive accumulation, passive revolution. Latin American Perspectives37(1): 7-34.
50.
Moulder FV ( 1977) Japan, China, and the Modern World Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
51.
Nakamura M. ( 1992) ‘Meiji Isshin no sekaishiteki ichii’ in Masanori Nakamura (ed.) Nihon no Kindai to Shihonshugi: Kokusaika to Chiiki [‘The world historical location of the Meiji Restoration: Capitalism and modern Japan’]. Tokyo: University of Tokyo.
52.
Norman EH ( 1940) Japan’s Emergence as a Modern State. Institute of Pacific Relations.
53.
Norman EH ( 1975) Origins of the Modern Japanese State. New York: Pantheon.
54.
Pomeranz K. ( 2000) The Great Divergence. New Jersey: Princeton.
55.
Reischauer EO, Craig AM ( 1989) Japan: Tradition and transformation, 2nd edition. London: Allen & Unwin.
56.
Rosenberg J. ( 1994) The Empire of Civil Society: A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.
57.
Rosenberg J. ( 2006) Why is there no international historical sociology?European Journal of International Relations12(3): 307-340.
58.
Rosenberg J. ( 2007) International Relations-the ‘Higher Bullshit’: A response to the globalization theory debate. International Politics44(4): 450-482.
59.
Rosenberg J. (forthcoming, 2010) Anarchy in the mirror of uneven and combined development: An open letter to Kenneth Waltz’, International Politics46.
60.
Rosengarten F.(1984-1985) The Gramsci-Trotsky question (1922-1932). Social Text11: 65-95.
61.
Sen G. ( 1984)The Military Origins of Industrialization and International Trade Rivalry. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
62.
Shilliam R.(2009) The Atlantic as a vector of uneven and combined development. Cambridge Review of International Affairs22(1): 69-88.
63.
Smith TC ( 1959) The Agrarian Origins of Modern Japan. Stanford: Stanford University.
64.
Smith TC ( 1960) Japan’s aristocratic revolution. The Yale Review50.
65.
Sugiyama S. ( 1988) Japan’s Industrialization in the World Economy, 1859-1899. London: Athlone Press .
66.
Takahashi K. ( 1930) Saikin no Nihon Keizai-shi [Japan’s Recent Economic History]. Tokyo: Heibonsh.
67.
Thomas P. ( 2009) The Gramscian Moment. Leiden: Brill.
68.
Totman C. ( 1980) From Sakoku to Kaikoku: The transformation of foreign-policy attitudes, 1853-1868. Monumenta Nipponica35(1): 1-19.
69.
Totman C. ( 2004) Pre-industrial Korea and Japan in Environmental Perspective . Leiden: Brill.
70.
Trimberger EK ( 1977) State power and modes of production: Implications of the Japanese transition to capitalism. Insurgent Sociologist7(2): 85-99.
71.
Trotsky L. ( 1936) The Third International after Lenin. New York: Pathfinder.
72.
Trotsky L. ( 1959) History of the Russian Revolution, transl. Eastman M. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
73.
Van der Pijl K. ( 2007) Nomads, Empires, States: Modes of Foreign Relations and Political Economy, Vol. I. London: Pluto Press.
74.
Westney DE ( 1987) Imitation and Innovation: The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns in Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
75.
White JW ( 1995) Ikki: Social Conflict and Political Protest in Early Modern Japan. Cornell: Cornell University .
76.
Wickham C. ( 1985) The uniqueness of the East. Journal of Peasant Studies12(2-3): 166-196.
77.
Yamada M. ( 1934) Nihon shihon-shugi bunseki [An Analysis of Japanese capitalism] . Tokyo.
