Persistent neuromuscular blockade is not uncommon in the recovery room and contributes to postoperative morbidity and possibly mortality. The use of neuromuscular monitoring and intermediate rather than long-acting neuromuscular blocking drugs have been shown to reduce its incidence. Clinically available methods of detecting and quantitating neuromuscular blockade are reviewed. The writer concludes that such monitoring should be routine when neuromuscular blocking drugs are used.
Viby-MogensenJ., Viby-MogensenB., OrdingH.Residual curarization in the recovery room.Anesthesiology1979; 539–541.
6.
FawcettW.J., DashA., FrancisGA, LibanJ.B., CashmanJ.N.Recovery from neuromuscular blockade: residual curarisation following atracurium or vecuronium by bolus or dosing infusions.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1995; 39: 288–293.
7.
HottonP., BurchettK.R., MaddenA.P.Comparison of recovery after neuromuscular blockade by atracurium or pancuronium.Br J Anaesth1988; 60: 36–42.
8.
KatzR.L.Neuromuscular effects of d-tubocurarine, edrophonium and neostigmine.Anaesthesiology1967; 28: 327–336.
9.
KoscielniakZ.J., HornA., SztukF., EriksenK., Theil SkovgaardL., Viby-MogensenJ.Timing of tracheal intubation: Monitoring the orbicularis oculi, the adductor pollicis or use a stopwatch?Eur J Anaesthesiol1996; 13: 130–135.
10.
BooijLHDJ. Active reversal and monitoring of neuromuscular blockade.In Neuromuscular transmission Ed. LeoH.D.J.Booij, BMJ Publishing Group, London, 1996, p. 170.
11.
BooijLHDJ. Active reversal and monitoring of neuromuscular blockade.In Neuromuscular transmission Ed. LeoH.D.J.Booij, BMJ Publishing Group, London, 1996, p. 169.
12.
KatzR.L.Clinical neuromuscular pharmacology of pancuronium.Anesthesiology1971; 34: 550–556.
13.
BeemerG.H., RozenthalP.Postoperative neuromuscular function.Anaesth Int Care1986; 14: 41–45.
14.
FezingA.K., d'HollanderA., BoogaertsJ.G.Assessment of the postoperative residual curarization using the train of four stimulation with acceleromyography.Acta Anaesthesiol Belgica1999; 50: 83–86.
FruergaardK., Viby-MogensenJ., BergH., El-MahdiA.M.Tactile evaluation of the response to double burst stimulation decreases but does not eliminate the problem of postoperative residual paralysis.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1998; 42: 1169–1174.
17.
AliH.H., WilsonR.S., SavareseJ.J., KitzR.J.The effect of curare on indirectly elicited train of four muscle response and respiratory measurement in humans.Br J Anaesth1975; 47: 570–574.
18.
BrandJ.B., CullenD.J., WilsonN.E., AliH.H.Spontaneous recovery from non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade: Correlation between clinical and evoked responses.Anesth Analg1977; 56: 55–58.
19.
PavlinE.G., HolleR.H., SchoeneR.B.Recovery of airway protection compared with ventilation in humans after paralysis with curare.Anaesthesiology1989; 70: 381–385.
20.
EngbaekJ., OstergaardD., Viby-mogensenJ., SkovgaardL.T.Clinical recovery and train-of-four measured mechanically and electromyographically following atracurium.Anesthesiology1989; 71: 391–395.
21.
BevanD.R.Neuromuscular Monitoring after surgery.Can J Anaesth1990; 37: 395–396.
22.
ErikssonL.I., SundmanE., OlssonR., NilssonL., WittH., EkbergO., KuylenstiernaR.Functional assessment of the pharynx at rest and during swallowing in partially paralysed persons: Simultaneous videomanometry and mechanomyography in awake human volunteers.Anesthesiology1997; 87: 1035–1043.
23.
ErikssonL.I., SatoM., SeveringhausJ.W.Effect of a vecuroniuminduced partial neuromuscular block on hypoxic ventilatory response.Anesthesiology1993; 78: 693–699.
24.
BergH., Viby-MogensenJ., RoedJ.Residual neuromuscular block is a risk factor for postoperative pulmonary complications: A prospective randomised and blinded study of postoperative complications after atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1997; 41: 1095–1103.
25.
Viby-MogensenJ.Postoperative residual curarization and evidence based anaesthesia.Brit J Anaesth2000; 84: 301–303.
26.
KopmanA.F., YeeP.S., NeumanG.G.Relationship of the train-of-four fade ratio to clinical signs and symptoms of residual paralysis in awake volunteers.Anesthesiology1977; 86: 765–771.
27.
PedersenT., Viby-MogensenJ., BangU., OlsenN.V., JensenE., EngbaekJ.Does perioperative tactile evaluation of the train-of-four response influence the frequency of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade?Anesthesiology1990; 73: 835–839.
28.
Viby-MogensenJ., JensenN.H., EngbaekJ., OrdingH., SkovgaardL.T., Chaemmer-JorgensenB.Tactile or visual evaluation of response to train-of-four nerve stimulation.Anesthesiology1985; 63: 440–443.
29.
SaddlerJ.M., BevanJ.C., DonatiF., BevanD.R., PintoM.B.Comparison of double-burst and train-of-four stimulation to assess neuromuscular blockade in children.Anesthesiology1990; 73: 401–403.
30.
EngbaekJ., OstergaardD., Viby-MogensenJ.Double burst stimulation (DBS): a new pattern of nerve stimulation to identify residual neuromuscular block.Br J Anaesth1989; 62: 274–278.
31.
Churchill-DavidsonH.C., ChristieT.H.Diagnosis of neuromuscular block in man.Brit J Anaesth1959; 31: 290–295.
32.
EngbaekJ., SkovgaardI.T., FriisB., KannT., Viby-MogensenJ.Monitoring of the neuromuscular transmission by electromyography. (I) Stability and temperature dependence of the evoked EMG response compared to mechanical twitch recording in the cat.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1992; 36: 495–504.
33.
EpsteinR.A., EpsteinR.M.The electromyogram and the mechanical response of indirectly stimulated muscle in anesthetized man following curarization.Anesthesiology1973; 38: 212.
34.
Comparison of electrical and mechanical recording of spontaneous and evoked muscle activity.Anesthesiology1965; 26: 204.
35.
KatzR.L.Electomyographic and mechanical effects of suxamethonium and tubocurarine on twitch, tetanic and post-tetanic responses.Br J Anaesth1973; 45: 849.
36.
KopmanA.F.The effect of resting muscle tension on the dose-effect relationship of d-tubocurarine: does preload influence the evoked EMG.Anesthesiology1988; 69: 1003–1005.
37.
DonlonJ.V., SavareseJ.J., AliH.H.Cumulative dose-response curves for gallamine: effect of altered thumb tension and mode of stimulation.Anesth Analg1979; 28: 337–381.
38.
Viby-MogensenJ., EngbaekJ., ErikssonL.I., GramstadL., JensenE., JensenF.S., Koscielnak-NielsenZ., SkovgaardL.T., OstergaardD.Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1996; 40: 59–74.
39.
ShanksC., HarrisonG.A.Mechanical factors affecting the evoked pressures from a simple twitch monitor.Anaesth Intensive Care1972; 1: 154–156.
NewellS., BrimacombeJ.Measurement of neuromuscular blockade—a comparison between a new “homemade” force displacement transducer and the accelerometer.Anaesth Intensive Care1995; 23: 203–205.
42.
PohlenG., RibeiroF.C., SchreiberG.Plethysmechanomyography (PMG). A simple method for monitoring relaxation.Anaesthetist1994; 43: 773–779.
43.
TordaT.A.A force-displacement transducer for quantitation of neuromuscular block.Anaesth Intensive Care1972; 1: 157–158.
44.
Kirkegaard-NielsenH., Helbo-HansenH.S., PedersenH.S., SeverinsenI.K., SchmidtM.B.New equipment for neuromuscular transmission monitoring: A comparison of the TOF-Guard with the Myograph 2000.J Clin Monitoring & Computing1998; 14: 19–27.
45.
DahabaA.A., RehakP.H., ListW.F.Assessment of accelerography with the TOF-Guard: A comparison with electromyography.Europ J Anaesthesiol1997; 14: 623–629.
46.
MortensenC.R., BergH., El-MahdyA., Viby-MogensenJ.Perioperative monitoring of neuromuscular transmission using accelerography prevents residual neuromuscular block following pancuronium.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1955; 39: 797–801.
47.
KernS.E., JohnsonJ.O., WestenskowD.R., OrrJ.A.A comparison of dynamic and isometric force sensors for train-of-four measurement using submaximal stimulation current.Journal of Clinical Monitoring1995; 11: 18–22.
48.
DahabaA.A., v KlobucarF., RehakP.H., ListW.F.Comparison of a new piezoelectric train-of-four neuromuscular monitor, the ParaGraph, and the Relaxometer mechanomyograph.Br J Anaesth1999; 82: 780–782.
KatzR.L.A nerve stimulator for the continuous monitoring of muscle relaxant action.Anesthesiology1965; 26: 832.
51.
HeisterkampD.V., CohenP.J.Technical note concerning the Bloc-Aid monitor.Anesthesiology1968; 29: 1210–1211.
52.
IwasakiH., IgarashiM., NamikiA.A preliminary clinical evaluation of magnetic stimulation of the ulnar nerve for monitoring neuromuscular transmission.Anaesthesia1994; 49: 814–816.
53.
Viby-MogensenJ.Clinical assessment of neuromuscular transmission.Br J Anaesth1982; 54: 209–223.
54.
AliH.H., SavareseJ.J.Monitoring of neuromuscular function.Anesthesiology1976; 45: 216–221.
55.
DupuisJ.Y., MartinR., TessonierJ.M., TetraultJ.P.Clinical assessment of the muscle response to tetanic nerve stimulation.Can J Anaesth1990; 37: 397–400.
56.
MertonP.A.Voluntary strength and fatigue.J Physiol1954; 123: 553.
57.
WaudB.E., WaudD.R.The relation between tetanic fade and receptor occlusion in the presence of competitive neuromuscular block.Anaesthesiology1971; 35: 456–464.
58.
TordaT.A., GrahamG.G., TsuiD.Neuromuscular sensitivity to atracurium in humans.Anaesth Intensive Care1990; 18: 62–68.
59.
AliH.H., UttingJ.E., GreyC.Stimulus frequency and the detection of neuromuscular block in humans.Br J Anaesth1970; 42: 967.
KopmanAF, LawsonD.Milliamperage requirement for supra-maximal stimulation of the ulnar nerve with surface electrodes.Anaesthesiology1984; 61: 83–85.
63.
BrullS.J., EhrenwerthJ., SilvermanD.G.Stimulation with sub-maximal current for train-of-four monitoring.Anesthesiology1990; 72: 629–632.
64.
Helbo-HansenH.S., BangU., Kierkegaard NielsenH., SkovgaardL.T.The accuracy of train-of-four monitoring with submaximal currents.Anaesthesiology1992; 76: 199–203.
65.
SilvermanD.G., BrullS.J.Assessment of double burst monitoring at 10 mA above threshold current.Can J Anaesth1993; 40: 502–506.
Kierkegaard-NielsenH., MayO.The influence of double burst stimulation (DBS) pattern on the DBS-train-of-four ratio relationship.Anesthesiologie, Intensivemedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmetztherapie1995; 30: 163–166.
Viby-MogensenJ., Howardy-HansenP., Chraemmer-jorgensenE., OrdingH., EngbaekJ., NielsenA.Post-tetanic count (PTC). Anew method of evaluating an intense non-depolarizing neuromuscular blockade.Anesthesiology1981; 55: 458–462.
70.
SaitohY., ToyookaH., AmahaK.Post-tetanic burst: a new monitoring method for intense neuromuscular block.Brit J Anaesth1995; 74: 293–295.
71.
SaitohY., FujiY., ToyookaH., AmahaK.Post-tetanic burst count: a stimulating pattern for profound neuromuscular blockade.Can J Anaesth1995; 42: 1096–1100.
72.
DonatiF., MeistelmanC., PlaudB.Vecuronium neuromuscular blockade at the diaphragm, the orbicularis oculi, and adductor pollicis muscles.Anesthesiology1990; 73: 870–875.
73.
MeistelmanC., PlaudB., DonatiF.Rocuronium (ORG 9426) neuromuscular blockade at the adductor muscles of the larynx and adductor pollicis in humans.Can J Anaesth1992; 39: 665–669.
74.
SmansJ., KorstenH.H.M., BlomJ.A.Optimal surface electrode positioningfor reliable train of four muscle relaxation monitoring.Int J Clin Monitoring and Computing1996; 13: 9–20.
75.
SaitohY., NarmiY., FujiY., UekiM., MakitaM.Electromyographic assessment of neuromuscular block at the gastrocnemius muscle.Br J Anaesth1999; 82: 329–332.
76.
SaitohY., FujiY., TakahashiK., MakitaK., TanakaH., YamahaK.Recovery of post-tetanic count and train-of-four responses at the great toe and thumb.Anaesthesia1998; 53: 244–248.
77.
KitajimaT., IshiiK., OgataH.Assessment of neuromuscular block at the thumb and great toe using accelerography in infants.Anaesthesia1996; 51: 341–343.
78.
HeierT., HetlandS.A comparison of train-of-four monitoring: mechanomyography at the thumb vs. acceleromyography at the big toe.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1999; 43: 550–555.
79.
CaffreyR.R., WarrenM.I., BeckerKEJr.. Neuromuscular blockade monitoring comparing the orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis muscles.Anesthesiology1986; 65: 95–97.
80.
UgureanuD., MeistelmanC., FrossardJ., DonatiC.The orbicularis oculi and the adductor pollicis muscles as monitors of atracurium block of laryngeal muscles.Anesth Analg1993; 77: 775–779.
81.
DebaeneB, BeaussierM., MeistelmanC., DonatiF., LienhartA.Monitoring the onset of neuromuscular block at the orbicularis oculi can predict good intubating conditions during atracurium-induced neuromuscular block.Anesth Analg1995; 80: 360–363.
82.
PlaudB., DebaeneB., DonatiF.The corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles.Anesthesiology2001; 95: 96–101.
83.
BevanD.R., SmithC.E., DonatiF.Postoperative neuromuscular blockade: a comparison between atracurium, vecuronium and pancuronium.Can J Anaesth1988; 69: 272–276.
84.
DonatiF.Neuromuscular monitoring: useless, optional or mandatory?Can J Anaesth1998; 45: R106–R111.
