The main objective of this paper is to present arguments for and recommendations to representing UNIMARC formats for bibliographic and authority data in RDF (Resource Description Framework), the W3C standard for structuring data in Semantic Web and Linked Data environment. This is a continuation of the work already started by IFLA’s respective groups in representing International Standard Bibliographic Description, and conceptual models Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, Functional Requirements for Authority Data and Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data. The authors highly recommend that the Permanent UNIMARC Committee propose to IFLA the funding of the development of UNIMARC representation in RDF as a research and development project.
MoenWilliam E.BenardinoPenelope. Assessing metadata utilization: an analysis of MARC content designation use. // International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, DC-2003–Seattle Proceedings. Available at: http://dcpapers.dublincore.org/ojs/pubs/article/view/745/741
GravesMikeConstabarisAdamBrickleyDan. FOAF: connecting people on the Semantic Web.
// Knitting the Semantic Web /GreenbergJaneMéndezEvaBinghampton, NY: The Haworth Information Press2007
P. 196For Golbeck and Parsia, see: GolbeckJ.ParsiaB.Trust Network-Based Filtering of Aggregated Claims. // International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies1 (2006), 58–65.
8.
IFLA. Cataloguing Section. ISBD Review Group, ISBD/XML Study Group. 2008. Available at: www.ifla.org/en/node/1795
DunsireGordonWillerMirna. Standard library metadata models and structures for the Semantic Web. // Library Hi Tech News, vol. 28no. 3. (2011) 1-12. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07419051111145118
12.
WillerMirnaDunsireGordonBosancicBoris. ISBD and the Semantic Web. // JLIS.it Journal of Library and Information Science. Italy, vol. 1, no. 2, (2010), pp. 213-236. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4403/jlis.it-4536
13.
Functional requirements for authority data: a conceptual model / edited byPattonGlenn E.IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR). Final report, December 2008 / approved by the Standing Committees of the IFLA Cataloguing Section and IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, March 2009. München: Saur, 2009. Also available at: www.ifla.org/publications/functional-requirements-for-authority-data
DunsireGordon. UNIMARC, RDA and the Semantic Web. // International Cataloguing and Bibliographic Control (ICBC), vol. 39, no. 2 (April/June 2010), pp. 37-40. Based on a paper presented to the World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Assembly, 23–27 August 2009, Milan, Italy; available at: www.ifla.org/files/hq/papers/ifla75/135-dunsire-en.pdf
17.
UNIMARC Manual: Bibliographic Format / edited by HopkinsonAlan. 3rd edition. München: Saur, 2007.
18.
UNIMARC Manual: Authorities Format / edited by WillerMirna. 3rd edition. München: Saur, 2009.
19.
WillerMirna. Foreword to the third edition. // UNIMARC Manual: Authorities Format / edited by WillerMirna. 3rd edition. München: Saur, 2009. pp. 7-9.
20.
ISBD: International standard bibliographic description / recommended by the ISBD Review Group; approved by the Standing Committee of the IFLA Cataloguing Section. Consolidated ed. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter Saur, 2011. Draft as of 2010–05–10 available at: www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/isbd/isbd_wwr_20100510_clean.pdf
21.
Semantic Web Education and Outreach (SWEO) Interest Group. Cool URIs for the Semantic Web. 2008. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/
