This study examines the relationship between smart and sustainable libraries in Malaysian public universities, focusing on ethical values. Data was collected from 342 librarians as a case study, and the results show that 8 out of 10 hypothesized constructs were significantly related to a smart sustainable library. However, ethical values played a mediating effect, positively influencing the development of smart library elements. The study's results are significant for stakeholders such as higher learning institutions, government policymakers, practitioners, smart library vendors, and academics specializing in smart and sustainable library practices. However, the limitations include the scope of the variables, respondents and measures used. Future research should consider expanding the study to include additional elements of smart libraries and involve a broader range of staff beyond librarians. This research aims to prepare future libraries to remain relevant and align with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.
AdetayoAJAdeniranPOOluwatoyinGA (2021) Augmenting traditional library services: Role of smart library technologies and big data. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 6164(2021): 1–15.
2.
AittolaMRyhänenTOjalaT (2003) SmartLibrary–location-aware mobile library service. In: Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services: 5th international symposium, mobile HCI 2003, September 2003, Udine, Italy. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
3.
AndersonJCGerbingDW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin103(3): 411–423.
4.
Ashrafi-RiziHKazempourZSheikhshoaeiF, et al. (2020) Designing a model of professional ethics excellence for clinical librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association108(4): 574–583.
5.
BaryshevRAVerkhovetsSVBabinaOI (2018) The smart library project: Development of information and library services for educational and scientific activity. Electronic Library36(3): 535–549.
6.
CaoGLiangMLiX (2018) How to make the library smart? The conceptualization of the smart library. Electronic Library36(5): 811–825.
7.
ChowdhuryG (2014) Sustainability of digital libraries: A conceptual model and a research framework. International Journal on Digital Libraries14: 181–195.
8.
CoxAMPinfieldSRutterS (2019) The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech37(3): 418–435.
9.
DattaAChaudhuriSK (2019) The awareness and understanding of sustainability by the academic library administrators: A micro level investigation in Kolkata, India. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal: Article 2938. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2938/
10.
DuncanA (2021) Opportunities for academic smart libraries in the Caribbean. Library Hi Tech News38(5): 9–12.
11.
DuncanA (2022) Augmented reality: Caribbean academic libraries of the future. Library Hi Tech News39(4): 11–14.
12.
DuncanASterlingJJ (2023) Smart cities fueled by smart libraries: Implementation and application in an English-speaking Caribbean context. Library Hi Tech News40(1): 13–19.
13.
El-MasriMMMowbrayFIFox-WasylyshynSM, et al. (2021) Multivariate outliers: A conceptual and practical overview for the nurse and health researcher. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research53(3): 316–321.
14.
EsaweATEsaweKTEsaweNT (2023) Acceptance of the learning management system in the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An application and extension of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. E-Learning and Digital Media20(2): 162–190.
15.
FangS (2020) Visualization of information retrieval in smart library based on virtual reality technology. Complexity. Epub 29 November 2020. DOI: 10.1155/2020/6646673.
16.
Fedorowicz-KruszewskaM (2021) Green libraries and green librarianship – towards conceptualization. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science53(4): 645–654.
17.
Fedorowicz-KruszewskaM (2022) Green library as a subject of research – a quantitative and qualitative perspective. Journal of Documentation78(4): 912–932.
18.
FergusonSThornleyCGibbF (2016) Beyond codes of ethics: How library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment. International Journal of Information Management36(4): 543–556.
19.
FrankeGSarstedtM (2019) Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research29(3): 430–447.
20.
GulSBanoS (2019) Smart libraries: An emerging and innovative technological habitat of 21st century. Electronic Library37(5): 764–783.
21.
HairJFBabinBJKreyN (2017) Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. Journal of Advertising46(1): 163–177.
22.
HairJFHultGTMRingleCM, et al. (2022) A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 3rd ed. United Kingdom: Sage.
23.
HairJF, Risher JJ, SarstedtM, et al. (2019) When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review31(1): 2–24.
24.
HamadFAl-FadelMFakhouriH (2022) The provision of smart service at academic libraries and associated challenges. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science55(4): 960–971.
25.
HenselerJRingleCMSarstedtM (2015) A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science43(1): 115–135.
26.
HussainA (2020) Industrial Revolution 4.0: Implication to libraries and librarians. Library Hi Tech News37(1): 1–5.
27.
HussainA and Pervaiz A (2021) Adoption of smart technologies in university libraries of Pakistan: A qualitative review. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 6055. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6055/
IgweKNSulymanAS (2022) Smart libraries: Changing the paradigms of library services. Business Information Review39(4): 147–152.
30.
IsaacAUOmameIM (2020) Application of social media and video conferencing in smart library services. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 3915. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/3915/
31.
IsmailFZYamanRRazaliKN (2022) Formulating an assessment tool for the implementation of green initiatives in library. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science1067(1): 012021.
32.
JacobsL (2022) Smart academic libraries possibilities through the application of the Internet of Things. In: Van Vuren AJ (ed.) Academic Libraries: Reflecting on Crisis, the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Way Forward. Johannesburg: UJ Press, 115–136.
33.
JadhavDShenoyD (2020) Measuring the smartness of a library. Library and Information Science Research42(3): Article 101036.
34.
JaegerPTBertotJCKettnichK (2016). Perspectives on libraries as institutions of human rights and social justice. Emerald Group Publishing.
35.
JankowskaMA andMarcumJW (2010) Sustainability challenge for academic libraries: Planning for the future. College and Research Libraries 71(2): 160–170.
36.
JankowskaMASmithBJBuehlerMA (2014) Engagement of academic libraries and information science schools in creating curriculum for sustainability: An exploratory study. Journal of Academic Librarianship40(1): 45–54.
37.
JerkovASofronijevicAStanisicDK (2015) Smart and sustainable library: Information literacy hub of a new city. In: Kurbanoglu S, Boustany J, Špiranec S, et al. (eds) Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability. Cham: Springer, 22–30.
38.
KhalidAMalikGFMahmoodK (2021) Sustainable development challenges in libraries: A systematic literature review (2000–2020). Journal of Academic Librarianship47(3): Article 102347.
39.
KockN (2015) Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration11(4): 1–10.
40.
LiaoJ (2020) The theoretical framework of library smart service: Literature review and content analysis. In: JCDL ’20:Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE joint conference on digital libraries, Virtual Event, China, 1–5 August 2020, pp. 471–472. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3383583.3398569.
41.
LowMPRamayahT (2023) It isn’t enough to be easy and useful! Combined use of SEM and necessary condition analysis for a better understanding of consumers’ acceptance of medical wearable devices. Smart Health27: Article 100370.
42.
MacdonaldS (2023) Intellectual freedom and social responsibility in library and information science: A reconciliation. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 56(3): 712–727.
43.
MathiassonMHJochumsenH (2022) Libraries, sustainability and sustainable development: A review of the research literature. Journal of Documentation78(6): 1278–1304.
44.
MeschedeCHenkelM (2019) Library and information science and sustainable development: A structured literature review. Journal of Documentation75(6): 1356–1369.
45.
Mohamad RosmanMRIsmailMNMasrekMN (2023) Determinants and impacts of digital library engagement: Evidence from research-based universities in Malaysia. International Journal of Information Science and Management21(3): 49–65.
46.
MohammedMAThabitTAzeezOS (2019) The impact of smart libraries in enhancing the sustainable development practices. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3495740
47.
MoonasarA (2024) Continuing professional development and the changing landscape of academic libraries. Library Management45(3–4): 226–242.
48.
NgahAHBandarNFAAwiNA, et al. (2022) The mediation effect of online shopping habits on personality traits and intention to recommend; the COVID-19 effect. International Journal of Business and Society23(1): 188–206.
49.
NoeDA (2020) Performance characteristics of the adjusted r2 algorithm for determining the start of the terminal disposition phase and comparison with a simple r2 algorithm and a visual inspection method. Pharmaceutical Statistics19(2): 88–100.
50.
OnoyeyanG (2018) An appraisal of ethical values in librarians’ code of ethics in Nigeria.Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 2171. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2171/
51.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88(5): 879–903.
52.
PrasanthMVasudevanTM (2019) Practice of professional ethics by librarians: A case study of the University of Calicut. ILIS Journal of Librarianship and Informatics2(2): 49–56.
53.
RingleCDa SilvaDBidoD (2015) Structural equation modeling with the SmartPLS. Brazilian Journal of Marketing 13(2). Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2676422 (accessed 23 June 2024).
54.
SarstedtMCheahJH (2019) Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: A software review. Journal of Marketing Analytics7(3): 196–202.
55.
SayogoDSYuliSBCWiyonoW (2022) The determinants of smart public library roles in promoting open government in Indonesia. International Information and Library Review54(2): 155–170.
ShiKCuiYLiuS, et al. (2023) Global urban land expansion tends to be slope climbing: A remotely sensed nighttime light approach. Earth’s Future11(4): Article e2022EF003384.
58.
ShmueliGSarstedtMHairJF, et al. (2019) Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: Guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing53(11): 2322–2347.
59.
SinghPMishraR (2021) Environmentally sustainable approaches in academic libraries: A micro-study in Uttar Pradesh. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article6110. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6110/
60.
SohaibMSafeerAAMajeedA (2022) Role of social media marketing activities in China’s e-commerce industry: A stimulus organism response theory context. Frontiers in Psychology13: Article 941058.
XuHLiuWLiL, et al. (2024) An IoT-based low-cost architecture for smart libraries using SDN. Scientific Reports14(1): Article 7022.
63.
YunusNIsmailMN (2024) Assessing smart sustainable library practices in higher education: Development and validation of instrument. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering14(4): Article 4394.
64.
YunusNIsmailMNOsmanG (2025) Smart library themes and elements: A systematic literature review. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 57(1): 175–190.
65.
YusufJ (2021) Information ethics compliance and service delivery by librarians in universities: A review. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 5549. Available at:https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5549/
66.
ZangTJiangJIkebeK, et al. (2023) Rethinking the external space of Japanese public libraries from the perspective of urban sustainability in a post-pandemic era. Sustainability15(10): Article 7796.
