Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study responds to contemporary international policy developments focused on protecting Indigenous creative work classified as Traditional Cultural Expressions. The study claims that states’ interests continue to guide policies in this area, compromising the relationship between regulations and the aspirations and needs of Indigenous communities. The study uses comparative methodology and content analysis to develop this argument. The study also highlights the significance of partnerships between Indigenous communities and cultural institutions that may function as alternative means to protect Indigenous creative works. The study explores cases from Indigenous communities and cultural institutions in New Zealand, the USA, and Mexico to develop this argument. The findings, while limited to the exploratory character of the study, may inform relevant library practices and support further research.

Keywords

Indigenous traditional knowledge intellectual property legislation libraries museums Mexico New Zealand policy development USA

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

(2024) Factors associated with the implementation of the protocols for native American archival materials: An exploratory study. Journal of Contemporary Archival Studies 11(1): 1–36.

Association of Tribal Archives, Libraries, and Museums (2021) Sustaining and advancing Indigenous cultures. Field surveys and summits. ATALM Conference publication.

Banks

(2023) Ngā Matatiki Mātauranga: Tikanga, policies and libraries. The Serials Librarian 84(5–8): 103–118.

Barclay

(2015) Our Own Image: a Story of a Māori Filmmaker. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Bartley

(2023) Implementing Indigenous approaches to knowledge and knowing at the John Hay library: A pueblo reflection. Library Trends 72(1): 70–89.

Bell

(2017) A bundle of relations: Collections, collecting, and communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 46(1): 241–259.

Carpenter

(2019) Archival initiatives for the indigenous collections at the American Philosophical Society. Available at: https://www.amphilsoc.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/attachments/Case_1_Archival_Initiatives_for_Indiginous_Collections.pdf (Accessed: 27 November 2024).

Charles

(2022) Oral traditions of the Woodland Cree (Nihithawak) in Northern Saskatchewan: Links to cultural identity, ways of knowing, language revitalization, and connections to the land. Northern Review 53: 25–37.

Christen

(2011) Opening archives: Respectful repatriation. The American Archivist 74(1): 185–210.

10.

Data Mexico (2024) Santa María Atzompa Municipality. Available at: https://www.economia.gob.mx/dataMexico/es/profile/geo/santa-maria-atzompa (Accessed: 26 October 2024).

11.

Doen

(2022) De me tierra artesanías: Las minas de Barro en Atzompa. Available at: https://youtu.be/0CkQsc3-WU0?si=aMuPa1abUhaLu-LE (accessed 25 October 2024).

12.

France 24 (2022) Mexico weaves fashion policy to help Indigenous communities. Available at: https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20221118-Mexico-weaves-fashion-policy-to help-indigenous-communities (accessed 26 October 2024).

13.

Frankel

McLay

(2002) Intellectual Property in New Zealand. London, UK: LexisNexis Butterworths.

14.

Garwood-Houng

Blackburn

(2014) The ATSILIRN protocols: A twenty-first century guide to appropriate library services for and about aboriginal and torres strait islander peoples. The Australian Library Journal 63(1): 4–15.

15.

Geismar

(2018) Museum object lessons for the digital age. London, UK: UCL Press.

16.

Gobierno de

(2022) Law for the protection of the cultural heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican peoples and communities. Available at: NA14-Cultural_patrimony_2023_eng_web.pdf (accessed 26 October 2024).

17.

Gordon

(2013) Appropriation without representation-the limited role of indigenous groups in WIPO'S intergovernmental committee on intellectual property and genetic resources, traditional knowledge, and folklore. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law 16(3): 629–667.

18.

Gosart

(2013) The Protection of the Traditional Knowledge of Indigenous Peoples. PhD thesis. Los Angeles, CA: University of California.

19.

Gosart

Kinnally

Sprouse

(2023) Protecting Indigenous music in the public domains: HathiTrust digital library case study. Collection Management 48(2): 69–83.

20.

Gosart

Wendland

(2023) Indigenous intellectual property rights: An Interview with Wend Wendland. The Serials Librarian. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2023.2235758.

21.

Graber

(2010) Institutionalization of creativity in traditional societies and in international trade law. IT-ICH i-call Working Paper No. 01. University of Luzern. Lucerne, 643–672.

22.

Hansen

López

(2023) Oknoma Nikan Tinemih: Improving inclusive access to the Indigenous studies collections at the Newberry Library. Library Trends 72(1): 48–69.

23.

Hansen

López

(2024) Indigenous Librarianship Webinar [Webinar]. Webinar: Library Trends.

24.

Hardison

(2005) Commentary: Traditional knowledge studies and the Indigenous trust. Practicing Anthropology 27(1): 42–45.

25.

Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources Aha Moku Advisory Committee (2016) Final rules of practice and procedure. Available at: https://luc.hawaii.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Aha-Moku_HAR_10-2016.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

26.

Henderson

Little Bear

(2021) Coming home: A journey through the trans-systematic knowledge systems. Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 7(1): 205–216.

27.

Herlihy

(2024) Protecting traditional transnational cultural expressions in the United States and México. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 56(1): 569–590.

28.

INAH (no date) LUGARES | Atzompa. Available at: https://lugares.inah.gob.mx/en/zona-arqueologicas/zonas/1757atzompa.html?lugar_id=1757 (accessed 26 October 2024).

29.

Janke

Curtis

Goulding

, et al. (2021) Comparative study of existing Genetic Resources (GR), Traditional Knowledge (TK) and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE) legislation and approaches with recommendations for best practice model national policies and laws. Available at https://www.taeclaos.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Comparative-Study-TK-TCE-GRTKTCE-Oma-Case-Study-Laos.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

30.

Jones

(2024) Self-determination as Voice: The Participation of Indigenous Peoples in International Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Kallenbach

(2009) The California Indian basketweavers association: Advocates for the use of museum collections by contemporary weavers. Museum Anthropology Review 3(1): 1–13.

32.

KapaKingi

(2020) Kia Tāwharautia Te Mātauranga Māori: Decolonising the intellectual property regime in Aotearoa New Zealand. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 51(4).

33.

Karuk Tribe (2015) Protocol on Karuk Tribe’s Intellectual Property Rights Research, Publication and Recordings. Available at: https://sipnuuk.karuk.us/system/files/atoms/file/ATALM17_KTResearchProtocol.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

34.

Kimmerer

(2013) Braiding Sweetgrass: Indigenous Wisdom, Scientific Knowledge and the Teachings of Plants. Minneapolis, MN: Milkweed Editions.

35.

Littletree

Belarde-Lewis

Duarte

(2020) Centering relationality: A conceptual model to advance indigenous knowledge organization practices. KO Knowledge Organization 47(5): 410–426.

36.

Maui

(2017) An indigenous perspective on the WIPO IGC. In: Protecting traditional knowledge. Routledge, pp. 219–229.

37.

McCauley

(2008) Tauranga city libraries: Meeting the needs of local iwi? Biculturalism and Māori cultural intellectual property. Available at: https://debbiemccauleyauthor.wordpress.com/essays/tauranga-city-libraries-meeting-the-needs-of-local-iwi-biculturalism-and-maori-cultural-intellectual-property/https://debbiemccauleyauthor.wordpress.com/about/ (accessed 27 November 2024).

38.

Mead

(2002) Understanding Māori intellectual property rights. Available at: https://perma.cc/74LL-SGE2 (accessed 12 March 2025).

39.

Morse

(2012) Indigenous human rights and knowledge in archives, museums, and libraries: Some international perspectives with specific reference to New Zealand and Canada. Archival Science 12: 113–140.

40.

Native American Rights Fund (2018) Karuk Tribe Intellectual Property Rights. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfHpBRNOZgM&t=1 s (accessed 27 November 2024).

41.

Native American Rights Fund (2024) World Intellectual Property Organization Negotiations. Available at: https://narf.org/cases/wipo/#:∼:text=The%20Karuk%20Tribe%20has%20developed,Knowledge%20and%20Traditional%20Cultural%20Expressions (accessed 27 November 2024).

42.

Newberry Library (2021) Access to culturally sensitive Indigenous materials in the Newberry library collections. Available at: https://www.newberry.org/uploads/files/Culturally_Sensitive_Indigenous_Materials.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

43.

New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment (2016) Protecting intellectual property with a Māori Cultural Element User Guide. Available at: https://www.iponz.govt.nz/assets/pdf/maori-ip/protecting-ip-with-a-maori-cultural-element.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

44.

Ornstein

(2023) Indigenous knowledge as evidence in federal rule-making. University of Miami Law Review 78: 409–431.

45.

Palapala Kulike O Ka ‘Aha Pono Paoakalani Declaration (2003) Available at: https://papaolalokahi.org/wp-content/uploads/pol-pdf/Paoakalani_Declaration_05_reduced.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

46.

Parsley

(1993) Regulation of counterfeit Indian arts and crafts: An analysis of the Indian arts and crafts act of 1990. American Indian Law Review 18(2): 487–514.

47.

Pepion

(2020) An introduction to Indigenous ways of knowing: A blackfeet perspective. In: Grayshield

(ed) Handbook of Indigenous Ways of Knowing in Counseling, Research, Theory and Practice. New York: Springer, 35–50.

48.

Perlman

(2017) Traditional cultural expressions. In: Robinson

Abdel-Latif

Roffe

(eds) Protecting Traditional Knowledge: The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. London, UK: Routledge, 173–191.

49.

Pfeiffer

Ortiz

(2007) Invasive plants impact: California native plants used in traditional basketry. Fremontia: Journal of California Native Plants Society 35(1): 7–14.

50.

Powell

(2014) The American philosophical society: Protocols for the treatment of indigenous materials. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 158(4): 411–420.

51.

Riley

(2005) Straight stealing: Towards an Indigenous system of cultural property protection. Washington Law Review 80(1): 69–164.

52.

Riley

(2022) The ascension of Indigenous cultural property law. Michigan Law Review 121: 75–146.

53.

Santamaria

(2023) Mexican Federal law for the protection of cultural heritage of indigenous and afro-Mexican peoples and communities,”. GRUR International 72(4): 364–375. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac146 (accessed 27 November 2024).

54.

Schmidt

(2021) New general law for the protection of cultural heritage of Indigenous and Afro-Mexican Peoples and Communities in Mexico. Available at: https://natllawreview.com/article/new-general-law-protection-cultural-heritage-indigenous-and-afro-mexican-peoples-and (accessed 16 November 2024).

55.

Shrinkhal

(2024) Protection of traditional knowledge (TK) and traditional cultural expressions’(TCEs) of Indigenous peoples: Some reflections. Sampratyaya 1(3): 24–33.

56.

Smith

(2005) These Resources are Yours: How Libraries and Archives in New Zealand in their Support of Research can Contribute to Decolonization. Tauranga, New Zealand [self-published].

57.

Taiuru

(2020) Māori data sovereignty with AI, algorithms, IOT and machine learning. Rights afforded to Māori & Crown obligations with legal instruments. Available at https://www.taiuru.co.nz/maori-data-sovereignty-with-ai-algorithms-iot-and-machine-learning-rights-afforded-to-maori-crown-obligations-with-legal-instruments/ (accessed 2 December 2024).

58.

Thorpe

Christen

Booker

, et al. (2021) Designing archival information systems through partnerships with Indigenous communities: Developing the Mukurtu hubs and spokes model in Australia. Australasian Journal of Information Systems 25: 1–22.

59.

Tulalip Tribes Natural Resources Department (no date) Indigenous rights. Available at: https://nr.tulaliptribes.com/Topics/IndigenousRights#:∼:text=The%20Tulalip%20Tribes%20has%20also%20contributed%20to%20the%20development%20of,Salish%2Dlike%20baskets%20in%20China (accessed 27 November 2024).

60.

Underhill

(2006) Protocols for native American archival materials. RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage 7(2): 134–145.

61.

UNESCO/WIPO (1982) Model provisions for national laws on the protection of expressions of folklore against illicit exploitation and other prejudicial actions. WIPO/GRTKF/IC/3.

62.

United Nations Commission on Human Rights (1993) The Mataatua declaration on cultural and intellectual property rights of Indigenous peoples. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/tk/en/databases/creative_heritage/docs/mataatua.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

63.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2003) Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. Available: https://ich.unesco.org/doc/src/15164-EN.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

64.

United Nations General Assembly (2007) United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf (accessed 1 February 2024).

65.

United Nations Human Rights Council (2024) Constitutions, laws, legislation, policies, judicial decisions and other mechanisms through which States have taken measures to achieve the ends of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, in accordance with article 38 of the Declaration: Study by the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2 August 2024). Available at: https://documents.un.org/doc/undoc/gen/g24/129/28/pdf/g2412928.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

66.

United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (2004) Collective statement of Kanaka Maoli Indigenous Hawaiian people of Ka Pae Aina o Hawai’ i. Available at: https://cendoc.docip.org/collect/cendocdo/index/assoc/HASH01cf/55cb8050.dir/234_as.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

67.

United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (2001) Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge Holders: WIPO Report on Fact-finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998–1999). Geneva: WIPO.

68.

United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (2009) WIPO panel on “Indigenous and Local Communities’ Concern and Experiences in Promoting, Sustaining and Safeguarding their Traditional Knowledge, Traditional Cultural Expressions and Genetic Resources.” Experiences from the United States of America. Available at https://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_14/wipo_grtkf_ic_14_inf_5_a.pdf (accessed 27 November 2024).

69.

United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (2011) Note on existing mechanisms for participation of observers in the work of the WIPO IGC. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/documents/d/igc/docs-en-igc_observer_participation.pdf (accessed 21 May 2025).

70.

United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization (2023) The WIPO Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Available at https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-rn2023-5-2-en-the-wipo-intergovernmental-committee-on-intellectual-property-and-genetic-resources-traditional-knowledge-and-folklore.pdf (accessed 21 May 2024).

71.

US Department of the Interior (no date) Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. Available at: https://www.bia.gov/service/nagpra (accessed 13 November 2024).

72.

Wright

Robinson

(2024) The Patents Māori Advisory Committee of Aotearoa New Zealand: Lessons for Indigenous knowledge protection. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 27: 222–241.

73.

Zuddas

Cocco

(2021) Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCEs), holder communities and conflicts with central states: Policies for the recognition of Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) and Intellectual Property (IP) regulation. In: Niglio

Lee

EYJ

(eds) Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation. Singapore: Springer, 209–228.