Politicized environmental identity is a central predictor of environmental activism. However, examinations of politicized environmental identity and environmental activist identity have failed to explore nuance embedded in the experiences of individuals with intersecting marginalized identities. Grounded in ecowomanism and Black feminism, this phenomenological inquiry explored the development of politicized environmental identity alongside other social identities through the narratives of six Black women environmental activists. Findings suggested that critical consciousness and exposure to environmental harm may be more facilitative of politicized environmental identity development among Black women, rather than identification with mainstream environmental organizations. Participants described Black womanhood as inherently political, linking systemic oppression to both their environmental realities and activist engagement. This study illuminated Black women's environmental activism through their unique intersectional position, enabling them to readily see connections between gendered racism and planetary destruction. Further, their activism facilitated increases in their confidence, self-efficacy, sense of agency, hope and joy, and courage to continually resist environmental destruction. As such, this research advances scholarship in Black and environmental psychologies and feminist studies and calls for the development of environmental activism frameworks centered in the intersectional lived experiences of marginalized and politically oppressed individuals. Additional online materials for this article are available on PWQ's website athttp://journals.sagepub.com/doi/suppl/10.1177/03616843251382254
AnyiwoN.PalmerG. J. M.GarrettJ. M.StarckJ. G.HopeE. C. (2020). Racial and political resistance: An examination of the sociopolitical action of racially marginalized youth. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 86–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.005
BravoM. A.AnthopolosR.BellM. L.MirandaM. L. (2016). Racial isolation and exposure to airborne particulate matter and ozone in understudied US populations: Environmental justice applications of downscaled numerical model output. Environment International, 92-93, 247–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.04.008
4.
BullardR. D. (1996). Symposium: The legacy of American apartheid and environmental racism. St John's Journal of Legal Commentary, 9, 445–474.
5.
ChisholmJ.GreeneB. (2008). Women of color: Perspectives on “multiple identities” in psychological theory, research, and practice. In DenmarkF. L.PaludiM. A. (Eds.), Psychology of women: A handbook of issues and theories (2nd ed., pp. 67–102). Praeger Publishers/Greenwood Publishing Group.
6.
ClaytonS. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. In ClaytonS.OpotowS. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment: The psychological significance of nature (pp. 45–65). MIT Press.
7.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Routledge.
8.
CollinsP. H. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed). Routledge.
9.
DonoJ.WebbJ.RichardsonB. (2010). The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.006
FieldingK. S.McDonaldR.LouisW. R. (2008). Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003
12.
FineM. A.KurdekL. A. (1994). Publishing multiple journal articles from a single data set: Issues and recommendations. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(4), 371–379. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/fam/8/4/371/ https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.8.4.371
13.
FranklinA. J.Boyd-FranklinN. (2000). Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African-American males. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 70(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0087691
14.
FreireP. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th anniversary ed.) (M. Bergman Ramos, Trans.). Continuum.
15.
FrenchB. H.LewisJ. A.MosleyD. V.AdamesH. Y.Chavez-DueńasN. Y.ChenG. A.NevilleH. A. (2020). Toward a psychological framework of radical healing in communities of color. The Counseling Psychologist, 48(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000019843506
16.
GuazziniA.ValdrighiG.FiorenzaM.DuradoniM. (2025). The relationship between connectedness to nature and pro-environmental behaviors: A systematic review. Sustainability, 17(8), 3686. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083686
17.
HarrisM. L. (2016). Ecowomanism. Worldviews, 20(1), 5–14. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26552243 https://doi.org/10.1163/15685357-02001002
18.
hooksb. (1990). Choosing the margin as a space of radical openness Yearning: Race, gender, and cultural politics (pp. 145–153). South End Press.
19.
HorwitzW. A. (1996). Developmental origins of environmental ethics: The life experiences of activists. Ethics & Behavior, 6, 29–53. https://doi.org/ 10.1207/s15327019eb0601_3
KohlE. (2021). ‘Some we’s weren’t part of we’: Intersectional politics of belonging in U.S. environmental justice activism. Gender, Place & Culture, 28(11), 1606–1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369X.2020.1832968
22.
Lindsay-DennisL. (2015). Black feminist-womanist research paradigm: Toward a culturally relevant research model focused on African American girls. Journal of Black Studies, 46(5), 506–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934715583664
MacKayC. M. L.CristoffaniniF.WrightJ. D.NeufeldS. D.OgawaH. F.SchmittM. T. (2021). Connection to nature and environmental activism: Politicized environmental identity mediates a relationship between identification with nature and observed environmental activist behaviour. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 2, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2021/100009
25.
MayerF. S.FrantzC. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals' feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001
26.
MikatiI.BensonA. F.LubenT. J.SacksJ. D.Richmond-BryantJ. (2018). Disparities in distribution of particulate matter emission sources by race and poverty status. American Journal of Public Health, 108(4), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304297
27.
MoralesA. L. (2019). Medicine stories: Essays for radicals. Duke University Press.
28.
MorrowS. L. (2005). Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 250–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250
29.
MosleyD. V.HargonsC. N.MeillerC.AngyalB.WheelerP.DavisC.Stevens-WatkinsD. (2021). Critical consciousness of anti-Black racism: A practical model to prevent and resist racial trauma. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 68(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000430
30.
MoustakasC. E. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications, Inc.
31.
NicolaiS.FranikowskiP.Stoll-KleemannS. (2022). Predicting pro-environmental intention and behavior based on justice sensitivity, moral disengagement, and moral emotions: Results of two quota-sampling surveys. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 914366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914366
32.
Olmos-VegaF. M.StalmeijerR. E.VarpioL.KahlkeR. (2022). A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: What’s the point? What’s the practice?Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(2), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400144
33.
OrtlippM. (2008). Keeping and using reflective journals in the qualitative research process. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 695–705.
34.
ParrisC. L.HegtvedtK. A.JohnsonC. (2020). Assessments of environmental injustice among Black Americans. Social Currents, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329496520950808
35.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.Green-DemersI.NoelsK.BeatonA. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The motivation toward the environment scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01714.x
36.
PellowD. N. (2018). What is critical environmental justice?Polity Press.
37.
PrimeauL. A. (2003). Reflections on self in qualitative research: Stories of family. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 57(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.57.1.9
38.
ProbstB.BerensonL. (2013). The double arrow: How qualitative social work researchers use reflexivity. Qualitative Social Work, 13(6), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325013506248
39.
SchmittM. T.MackayC. M. L.DroogendykL. M.PayneD. (2019). What predicts environmental activism? The roles of identification with nature and politicized environmental identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 61, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.11.003
shodiya-ZeumaultS.AielloM.HingerC. L.DeBlaereC. (2022). “We were loving warriors!”: A content analysis of Black women’s resistance within psychological science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 46(2), 176–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211064181
42.
shodiya-zeumaults.DeblaereC.BranyanH. F. (2025). A phenomenological analysis of the psychological impact of Black women environmental activists' resistance to environmental racism. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 72(3), 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000788
43.
SchultzP. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In SchmuckP.ShultzW. P. (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development (pp. 61–78). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4
44.
SmithJ. A.FlowersP.LarkinM. (2022). Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
45.
SmithJ. A.OsbornM. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage Publications, Inc.
46.
SternP. C.DietzT.AbelT.GuagnanoG. A.KalofL. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97.
47.
SternP. C.DietzT.KalofL.GuagnanoG. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and pro-environmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitudes objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1611–1636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02636.x
48.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In JostJ. T.SidaniusJ. (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings (pp. 276–293). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203505984-16
49.
ThomasL. (2022). The intersectional environmentalist: How to dismantle systems of oppression to protect people and planet. Voracious.
50.
TianH.LiuX. (2022). Pro-environmental behavior research: Theoretical progress and future directions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116721
51.
TindallD. B.DaviesS.MaubolèsC. (2003). Activism and conservation behavior in an environmental movement: The contradictory effects of gender. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 909–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920390231478
52.
TindallL.SmithJ. A.FlowerP.LarkinM. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 6(4), 346–347.
WilliamsM. G.LewisJ. A. (2021). Developing a conceptual framework of Black women’s gendered racial identity development. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 45(2), 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684320988602
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
