This paper presents several examples of recent work in the field of surface modification and characterization of biomaterials. Due to the explosion of techniques and approaches in this area, a complete review would be unmanageable in a single paper. Rather selected examples taken from such different areas as bone-contacting devices, drug eluting stents, and immobilization of novel biomolecules are presented. The aim is to place the existing and quickly developing background of analytical and synthetic biomaterial surface science into the current perspective of this rapidly evolving discipline.
VoglerE.A.On the biomedical relevance of surface spectroscopies. Journal of Electron Spectroscopies and Related Phenomena1996; 81: 237–47.
2.
BohnP.W.Peptide- and protein-based biomolecular assemblies: physical and chemical charcaterization for optimal function. In: RuslingJ.F., ed. Biomolecular films. Surf Sci Series 111. New York: Dekker; 2003. p 163–212.
3.
AdellR., LeckholmU., RocklerB., BranemarkP.I.A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg1981; 10: 387–416.
4.
AlbrektssonT.The response of bone to titanium implants. CRC Crit Rev Biocomp1984; 1: 53–84.
5.
HanssonH.A., AlbrektssonT., BranemarkP.I.Structural aspects of the interface between tissue and titanium implants. J Prosthet Dent1983; 50: 108–11.
6.
DaviesJ.E., ed. The bone-biomaterial interface.Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1991.
7.
DaviesJ.E., ed. Bone Engineering.Toronto: em squared; 2000.
8.
BrunetteD.M., TengvallP., TextorM., ThomsenP., eds. Titanium in medicine.Berlin: Springer; 2001.
9.
HammerleC.Current issues forum. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2005; 20: 311–2.
10.
PuleoD.A., NanciA.Understanding and controlling the bone-implant interface. Biomaterials1999; 20: 2311–21.
Panduranga RaoK.Recent developments of collagen based biomaterials for medical applications and drug delivery systems. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed1995; 7: 623–45.
13.
GungormusM., KayaO.Evaluation of the effect of heterologous type I collagen on healing of bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg2002; 60: 541–5.
14.
HeemskerkJ.W.M., WustW.M.J., FeijgeM.A.H., ReutelingspergerC.M.P., LindhoutT.Collagen but not fibrinogen surfaces induce bleb formation, exposure of phosphatidylserine, and procoagulant activity of adherent platelets: evidence for regulation by protein tyrosine kinase-dependent Ca2+ responses. Blood1997; 90: 2615–25.
15.
GemmellC.H., ParkJ.Y.Initial blood interactions with endosseous implant materials. In: DaviesJ.E., ed. Bone engineering, Toronto: em squared; 2000. p 108–17.
16.
MikulecL.J., PuleoD.A.Use of p-nitrophenyl chloroformate chemistry to immobilize protein on orthopedic biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res1996; 32: 203–8.
GrillA.Cold plasma in materials fabrication.New York: IEEE Press; 1994.
19.
GarbassiF., MorraM., OcchielloE.Polymer surfaces from physics to technology, revised edition.Chichester: Wiley; 1998.
20.
PuleoD.A., KisslingR.A., SheuM.S.A technique to immobilize bioactive proteins, including bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4), on titanium alloy. Biomaterials2002; 23: 2079–87.
21.
MorraM., CassinelliC., CascardoG., CahalanP., CahalanL., FiniM., GiardinoR.Surface engineering of titanium by collagen immobilization. Surface characterization and in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomaterials2003; 24: 4639–54.
22.
MorraM., CassinelliC., CascardoG., FiniM., GiardinoR., GiavaresiG.Collagen I-coated titanium surfaces: mesenchymal cell adhesion and in vivo evaluation in trabecular bone implants. J Biomed Mater Res2006; 78: 449–58.
23.
SulY.T.The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials2003; 24: 3893–907.
24.
LiL.H., KongY.M., KimH.W., KimY.W., KimH.E., HeoS.J., KoakJ.Y.Improved biological performance of Ti implants due to surface modification by micro-arc oxidation. Biomaterials2004; 25: 2867–75.
25.
SulY.T., JohanssonC.B., PetronisS., KrozerA., JeongY., WennerbergA., AlbrektssonT.Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials2002; 23: 491–501.
MerretK., CorneliusR.M., Mc LungW.G., UunsworthL.D., SheardownH.Surface analysis methods for characterizing polymeric biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed2002; 13: 593–621.
28.
DilksA.X-ray Photoelectron spectroscopy for the investigation of polymeric materials. In: BrukerA.D., BrundleC.R., eds. Electron spectroscopy: theory, techniques and applications. Vol. 4. London: Academic Press; 1981. p 277–359.
29.
MillerD.R., PeppasN.A.Surface characterization of polymers. Journal of Macromolecular Science Reviews of Macro-molecular Chemistry and Physics1986; C26: 33–45.
30.
RatnerB.D., McElroyB.J.Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis: applications in biomedical sciences. In: GendreauR., ed. Spectroscopy in the biomedical sciences.Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1986. p 107–40.
31.
KasemoB., LausmaaJ.Biomaterial and implant surfaces: on the role of cleanliness, contamination and preparation procedures. J Biomed Mater Res1988; 22: 145–58.
32.
MorraM., ed. Water in biomaterials surface science.Chichester: Wiley; 2001.
33.
ButtH.J., KapplM., MuellerH., RaiteriR., MeyerW., RuheJ.Steric forces measured with the atomic force microscope at various temperatures. Langmuir1999; 15: 2559–65.
34.
MorraM., CassinelliC., MedaL., FiniM., GiavaresiG., GiardinoR.Surface analysis and effects on interfacial bone microhardness of collagen-coated titanium implants: a rabbit model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants2005; 20: 23–30.
35.
MorraM., CassinelliC., FiniM., GiardinoR.Enhanced osteointegration by biochemical surface modification: covalent linking of collagen I to intervertebral metal disk surface. Eur Cell Mat2005; 10(suppl 3): 6.
36.
PopmaJ.J., CaliffR.M., TopolE.J.Clinical trials of restenosis after coronary angioplasty. Circulation1991; 84: 1426–36.
37.
SerruysP.W., de JaegereP., KiemeneijF.A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med1994; 331: 489–95.
38.
EdelmanE.R., RogersC.Hoop dreams: stents without restenosis. Circulation1996; 94: 1199–202.
van der GiessenW.J., LincoffA.M., SchwartzR.S.Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation1996; 94: 1690–7.
41.
MorraM.Engineering of biomaterials surfaces by hyaluronan. Biomacromolecules2005; 6: 1205–23.
42.
WightT.N., EvankoS.P.Hyaluronan is a critical component in atherosclerosis and restenosis and in determining arterial smooth muscle cell phenotype. In: KennedyJ.F., PhillipsG.O., WilliamsP.A., HascallV., eds. Hyaluronan.Woodhead: Publishing Limited; 2002. Vol. 2. p 173–6.
43.
ChajaraA., LevesqueH.Role of hyaluronic acid in the arterial response to angioplasty. Pathol Biol (Paris)1998; 46: 561–70.
44.
SavaniR.C., TurleyE.A.The role of hyaluronan and its receptors in restenosis after balloon angioplasty: development of a potential therapy. Int J Tissue React1995; 17: 141–51.
45.
MorraM., CassinelliC., BosioS.Multifunctional drug carriers by biochemical surface modification of drug-eluting stents: surface characterization and 28-days in vivo results in a pig model. Proceeding of the 20th European Conference on Biomaterials. Nantes, September 2006.
46.
VickermanJ.C., BrownA., ReedN.M.Secondary ion mass spectrometry, principles and applications.Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989.
47.
ThierryB., WinnikF.M., MerhiY., SilverJ., TabrizianM.Bioactive coatings of endovascular stents based on polyelectrolyte multilayers. Biomacromolecules2003; 4: 1564–71.
WagnerH., KrausS.News on immunologically active plant polysaccharides. In: PaulsenB.S., ed. Bioactive carbohydrate polymers.Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2000. p 1–14.
50.
ScholsH.A., VoragenA.G.J.The chemistry of pectins. In: SeymourG.B., KnoxJ.P., eds. Pectins and their manipulation.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2003. p 1–29.
51.
MorraM., CassinelliC., CascardoG., NagelM.D., Della VolpeC., SiboniS., ManiglioD., BrugnaraM., CecconeG., ScholsH.A., UlvskovP.Effects on interfacial properties and cell adhesion of surface modification by pectic hairy regions. Biomacromolecules2004; 5: 2094–104.
52.
YamadaH.Bioactive plant polysaccharides from Japanese and Chinese traditional herbal medicines. In: PaulsenB.S., ed. Bioactive carbohydrate polymers.Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000. p 15–24.
53.
Nangia-MakkerP., ConklinJ., HoganV., RazA.Carbohydrate-binding proteins in cancer, and their ligands as therapeutic agents. Trends Mol Med2002; 8: 187–92.
54.
CE Founded STREP project.Nanobiotechnology for the coating of medical devices - PectiCoat. Sixth Framework Programme “Nanotechnologies and nanosciences, knowledge-based multifunctional materials and new production processes and devices”. Available at: http://www.pecticoat.org.
