The gradual increase in indications for radical prostatectomy over these last few years has focussed attention on the issue of surgical margin positivity. In terms of prognosis, a positive surgical margin is comparable to lymph node positivity. The routine adoption of the most advanced anatomo-histological methods has increased our 17.5% of positive surgical margins to 30.2% despite surgical indication having become increasingly more rigid. In addition, more precise preoperative staging by echo-guided biopsy of the seminal vesicles and of periprostatic spaces, has allowed patients with positive lymph nodes to be reduced to just over 1%.
ZinckeH.UtzD.C.TaylorW.F.: Bilateral pelvic lymph-adenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinical stage C prostatic cancer: role of adjuvant treatment for residual cancer and in disease progression. J. Urol., 135: 1199–1205, 1986.
LabrieF.CusanL.GomezJ.L.DiamondP.SuburuR.LemayM.TetuB.FradetY.CandasB.: Down staging of early stage prostate cancer before radical prostatectomy: neoadjuvant combination therapy with flutamide and a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. Urology symposium, vol. 44, number 6A, 1994.
4.
Fattori prognostici e valutazione patologica del campione bioptico dopo prostatectomia radicale.“Workshop on carcinoma prostatico”, ed. Takeda 1994.
5.
GraziottiP.BenzoneS.GiarmoneV.GiardinaC.GuizzettiC.RanieriA.RomanoC.LemboA.: La prostatectomia radicale “Nerve Sparing” alla luce degli attuali limiti della stadiazione clinica preoperatoria: nostra esperienza. Acta Urol. Ital., 6 (suppl. 1): 567–570, 1991.
6.
GraziottiP.LosaA.HurleR.LemboA.: Le nostre attuali indicazioni alla prostatectomia radicale. Arch. Ital. Urol., LXVII; 191–193, 1995.
7.
EpsteinJ.I.CarmichaelM.J.PizovG.WalshP.: Influence of capsular penetration on progression following radical prostatectomy: a study of 196 cases with long term follow-up. J. Urol., 150: 135–141, 1993.
8.
WeldonV.E.TravelF.R.NeuwirthH.CohenR.: Patterns of positive specimen margins and detectable prostate specific antigen after radical perineal prostatectomy. J. Urol., 153: 1565–1569, 1995.
9.
BelussiD.GraziottiP.LemboA.: Preoperative staging of prostatic cancer with transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of seminal vesicles and periprostatic areas. J. Endourol., 8 (suppl. 1): 18–424, 1994.
10.
Van den OudenD.BentvelsenF.M.BoevéE.R.SchroederF.H.: Positive margins after radical prostatectomy: correlation with local recurrence and distal progression. Brit. J. Urol., 72: 489–494, 1993.
11.
RaveryV.Boccon-GibodL.A.MeulemansA.Dange-GeffroyM.C.ToublancM.Boccon-GibodL.: Predictive value of pathological features for progression after radical prostatectomy. Europ. Urol., 26: 197–201, 1994.
