Trends in commodity terms-of-trade since 1970 are estimated for a sizable sample of countries. The predominant pattern for developing countries is that of negative trends, but there is some improvement since 1980, and an increase in the share of manufactures in exports appears helpful. The estimates seem generally supportive of the spirit of Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Establishment of an international organization to generate and disseminate technology for developing countries might mitigate their disadvantage in international exchange.
Athukorala, P.1993. Manufactured exports from developing countries and their terms-of-trade: A reexamination of the Sarkar-Singer results. World Development21 (10): 1607–1613.
2.
Athukorala, P.2000. Manufactured exports and terms-of-trade of developing countries: Evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Development Studies36(5): 89–104.
3.
Balassa, B.1989. Outward orientation. Handbook of Development Economics. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
4.
Bleaney, M.1993. Manufactured exports of developing countries and their terms-of-trade since 1965: A comment. World Development21 (10): 1615–1616.
5.
Bleaney, M., and D. Greenaway. 1993. Long-run trends in the relative price of primary commodities and in the terms-of-trade of developing countries. Oxford Economic Papers45: 349–363.
6.
Bloch, H., and D. Sapsford. 2000. Whither the terms of trade? An elaboration of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics24: 461–481.
7.
Canjels, E., and M. W. Watson. 1997. Estimating deterministic trends in the presence of serially correlated errors. Review of Economics and Statistics79 (2): 184–200.
8.
Grilli, E. R., and M. C. Yang. 1988. Primary commodity prices, manufactured goods prices, and the terms-oftrade of developing countries: What the long run shows. World Bank Economic Review2: 1–47.
9.
International Monetary Fund. 2000. International financial statistics yearbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
10.
Kakwani, N.1997. Growth rates of per-capita income and aggregate welfare: An international comparison. Review of Economics and Statistics79 (2): 201–211.
11.
Lucke, M.1993. Developing countries’ terms-of-trade in manufactures, 1967-87: A note. Journal of Development Studies29 (3): 588–595.
12.
Maizels, A.2000. The manufacturers terms-of-trade of developing countries with the United States, 1981-97. QEH working paper no. 36, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
13.
Nelson, C. R., and H. Kang. 1984. Pitfalls in the use of time as an explanatory variable in regression. Journal of Business & Economics Statistics2 (1): 73–82.
14.
Powell, A.1991. Commodity and developing country terms-of-trade: What does the long run show? Economic Journal101: 1485–1496.
15.
Prebisch, R.1950. The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. New York: United Nations.
16.
Sapsford, D.1985. The statistical debate on the net barter terms of trade between primary commodities and manufactures: A comment and some additional evidence. Economic Journal95: 781–788.
17.
Sarkar, P.2001. The North-South terms-of-trade debate: A re-examination. Progress in Development Studies1(4): 309–327.
18.
Sarkar, P., and H. W. Singer. 1991. Manufactured exports of developing countries and their terms-of-trade since 1965. World Development19 (4): 333–340.
19.
Sarkar P., 1993. Manufacture-manufacture terms-of-trade deterioration: A reply. World Development21(10): 1617–1620.
20.
Singer, H. W.1950. The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review40: 473–485.
21.
Singer, H. W.1975. The distribution of gains from trade and investment-revisited. Journal of Development Studies11(4): 376–382.
22.
Spraos, J.1980. The statistical debate on the net barter terms-of-trade between primary commodities and manufactures. Economic Journal90: 107–128.
23.
Todaro, M. P., and S. C. Smith. 2003. Economic development. 8th ed.New York: Addison-Wesley.
24.
United Nations. Various years. Monthly bulletin of statistics. New York: United Nations.
25.
World Bank. 2001. Global economic prospects and the developing countries 2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.
26.
World Bank. 2002.World development indicators: 2002. Washington, DC: World Bank.
27.
World Trade Organization. 2002 (WTO). Annual report 2002. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
