This article examines the rhetoric of the debate about Social Security. It suggests that political opportunism by Presidents Johnson and Clinton undermined the rhetorical position of supporters of Social Security. It details the approach taken by neoconservatives in their efforts to dismantle the system and suggests rhetorical responses that have been effective in countering those efforts. It also traces the ebb and flow of confidence in the system, as measured by public opinion polls.
Baker, D.2005. Defaulting on the Social Security Trust Fund: What it would mean, and how it would be done. Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
2.
Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation. 2005. The Washington Post/Kaiser Family Foundation/Harvard University survey on Social Security. Menlo Park, CA: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
3.
Hungerford, T.2004. How ignoring fluctuations in lifetime earnings affects Social Security. Challenge47 (2): 90-108.
4.
Jacobs, L. R., and R. Y. Shapiro. 1999. Myths and misunderstandings about public opinion toward Social Security: Knowledge, support, and reformism. New York: Century Foundation.
5.
Lakoff, G.2004. Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
6.
Langer, D.2001. Saving Social Security?Christian Science Monitor, May 23, 9-9.
7.
Lomax-Cook, F., J. Barabas, and B. I. Page. 2002. Invoking public opinion: Policy elites and social security. Public Opinion Quarterly66: 235-264.
8.
Love, J.2005. Public attitudes toward Social Security and private accounts. Washington, DC: AARP Knowledge Management.
9.
Orr, D. V. 1999. Why defined contribution savings plans are not pensions. Paper presented at the Allied Social Science Associations meetings in New York, January.
10.
Orr, D. V.2004. Social Security isn’t broken: So why does Greenspan want to fix it?Dollars & Sense256: 14-16.
11.
Palley, T. I.2002. Social Security: Pre-funding is not the answer. Challenge45 (2): 97-118.
12.
Price, L.2004. Private accounts: The “spicy sauce” to sell deep benefit cuts. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
13.
Trustees of the Social Security Administration. 2004. Annual report of the board of trustees, Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance and Disability trust funds, 2004. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
14.
Wehner, P. H.2005. White House Social Security memo. New York Times, January 6.
15.
Wolman, W., and A. Colamosca. 2002. The great 401(k) hoax. Cambridge, MA: Perseus.
16.
Wray, L. R.2005. Manufacturing a crisis: The neocon attack on Social Security. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Levy Economics Institute.
