This article aims to begin to fill a gap in the literature by offering a comprehensive critique of Douglass North’s work with emphasis on his historical studies. After a brief overview of his theoretical contributions, a closer scrutiny of his theory in its application to history is offered. North’s histories are found to be problematic. To resolve the difficulties involved requires a break with his methodology and the supplemented neoclassical economics from which it is drawn.
Anderson, P.1974a. Lineages of the absolutist state. London: Verso.
2.
Anderson, P.. 1974b. Passages from antiquity to feudalism. London: Verso.
3.
Anderson, P.. 1980. Arguments within English Marxism. London: Verso.
4.
Ankarloo, D.2002. New institutional economics and economic history. Capital and Class78: 9-36.
5.
Ankarloo, D., and G. Palermo.2004. Anti-Williamson: A Marxian critique of new institutional economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics28: 413-429.
6.
Balibar, E.1970. The basic concepts of historical materialism. In Reading capital, pt. III, ed. L. Althusser and E. Balibar, 199-308. London: Verso.
7.
Bates, R. H., A. Greif, M. Levi, J-L. Rosenthal, and B. Weingast.1998. Analytic narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
8.
Blaut, J. M.1993. The colonizer’s model of the world: Geographical diffusionism and Eurocentric history. New York: Guilford.
9.
Reprinted in The Brenner debate: Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe (1985), ed. T. Aston and C. Philpin, 10-63. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Reprinted in The Brenner debate: Agrarian class structure and economic development in pre-industrial Europe (1985), ed. T. Aston and C. Philpin, 213-327. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Brenner, R.. 1986. The social basis of economic development. In Analytical Marxism, ed. J. Roemer, 23-53. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Callinicos, A.1987. Making history: Agency, structure and change in social theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
13.
Coase, R.1937. The nature of the firm. Economica4 (4): 386-405.
14.
Coase, R.. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics3 (1): 1--44.
15.
Dobb, M. [1946] 1963. Studies in the development of capitalism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
16.
Duby, G.1968. Rural economy and country life in medieval West. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
17.
Dugger, W.1995. Douglass C. North’s new institutionalism. Journal of Economic IssuesXXIX (2): 453-458.
18.
Eggertsson, T.1996. A note on the economics of institutions. In Empirical studies in institutional change, ed. L. J. Alston, T. Eggertsson, and D. C. North, 6-24. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Engels, F.1976. Anti-Dühring. Peking: Foreign Language Press.
20.
Fenoaltea, S.1975. The rise and fall of a theoretical model: The manorial system. Journal of Economic History (35): 386-409.
21.
Field, A. J.1981. The problem of neoclassical institutional economics: A critique with special reference to the North/Thomas model of pre-1000 Europe. Explorations in Economic History18 (2): 174-198.
22.
Fine, B.2002. The world of consumption: The cultural and material revisited. London and New York: Routledge.
23.
Fine, B.2003. From the newer economic history to institutions and development? Institutions and Economic Development1 (1): 105-136.
24.
Fine, B., and D. Milonakis.2003. From principle of pricing to pricing of principle: Rationality and irrationality in the economic history of Douglass North. Comparative Studies in Society and History45 (3): 120-144.
25.
Fischer, S.1977. Long-term contracting, sticky prices, and monetary policy: A comment. Journal of Monetary Economics3 (3): 317-324.
26.
Fogel, R.1997. Douglass C. North and economic theory. In The frontiers of new institutional economics, ed. J. Drobak and J. Nye, 13-27. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27.
Fourie, F. C. v. N.1993. In the beginning there were markets? In Transaction costs, markets and hierarchies, ed. C. Pitelis. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
28.
Giddens, A.1979. Central problems in social theory. London: MacMillan.
29.
Groenewegen, J., F. Kerstholt, and A. Nagelkerke.1995. On integrating new and old institutionalism: Douglass North building bridges. Journal of Economic IssuesXXIX (2): 467-475.
30.
Heilbroner, R., and W. Milberg.1995. The crisis of vision in modern economic thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Hilton, R.1978. Introduction. In The transition from feudalism to capitalism, ed. R. Hilton. London: Verso.
32.
Hodgson, G. M.1988. Economics and institutions. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
33.
Hodgson, G. M.2004. The evolution of institutional economics: Agency, structure and Darwinism in American institutionalism. London and New York: Routledge.
34.
Holton, R. J.1985. The transition from feudalism to capitalism. London: Macmillan Education.
35.
Hughes, J.1982. Douglass North as a teacher. In Explorations in the new economic history: Essays in honor of Douglass C. North, ed. R. Ransom, R. Sutch, and G. Walton, 1-11. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36.
Le Roy Ladurie, E.1974. The peasants of Languedoc. Urbana: University of Illinois, originally published in French in 1966.
37.
Lloyd, C.1986. Explanation in social history. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
38.
Mantzavinos, C., D. North, and S. Shariq.2004. Learning, institutions, and economic performance. Perspectives on Politics2 (1): 75-84.
39.
Marx, K. [1852] 1972. The eighteenth brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In K. Marx, F. Engels, and V. Lenin, On historical materialism, 120-133. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
40.
Matthews, R.1986. The economics of institutions and the sources of growth. Economic Journal96 (4): 903-918.
41.
Mills, C. W.1959. The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
42.
Milonakis, D.1993-1994. Prelude to the genesis of capitalism: The dynamics of the feudal mode of production. Science and Society57 (4): 390-419.
43.
Milonakis, D.1997. The dynamics of history: Structure and agency in historical evolution. Science and Society61 (3): 303-329.
44.
Myhrman, J., and B. Weingast.1994. Douglass C. North’s contributions to economics and economic history. Scandinavian Journal of Economics96 (2): 185-193.
45.
Nilsson, E.1993. Review of Douglass North’s Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Review of Radical Political Economics25 (3): 145-145.
46.
North, D.1981. Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.
47.
North, D.. 1989. Institutions and economic growth: An historical introduction. World Development17 (9): 1319-1332.
48.
North, D.. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49.
North, D.. 1992. Privatization, incentives, and economic performance. In Privatization: Symposium in honor of Herbert Giersch, ed. H. Siebert, 3-16. Tübingen: Mohr.
50.
North, D.. 1993. The ultimate sources of economic growth. In Explaining economic growth: Essays in honour of Angus Maddison, ed. A. Szirmai, B. van Ark, and D. Pilat, 65-77. North-Holland: Elsevier.
51.
North, D.. 1995. The new institutional economics and Third World development. In The new institutional economics and Third World development, ed. J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C. Lewis, 17-26. London and New York: Routledge.
52.
North, D.. 1997a. Prologue. In The frontiers of new institutional economics, ed. J. Drobak and J. Nye. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53.
North, D.. 1997b. The contribution of the new institutional economics to an understanding of the transition problem. WIDER Annual Lecture 1, March, Helsinki.
54.
North, D., and R. Thomas.1973. The rise of the Western world: A new economic history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
North, D., and B. Weingast.1989. Constitutions and credible commitments: The evolution of the institutions of public choice in 17th century England. Journal of Economic History49 (4): 803-832.
56.
Pitelis, C. N.1998. Transaction costs and the historical evolution of the capitalist firm. Journal of Economic IssuesXXXII (4): 999-1017.
57.
Postan, M.1950. Some economic evidence of declining population in the later Middle Ages. Economic History Review2 (3): 221-246.
58.
Postan, M.. 1966. England. In Cambridge economic history of Europe, vol. 1, ed. M. Postan, 549-632. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
Rostow, W. [1960] 1990. The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto, 3rd rev. ed.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Rutherford, M.1994. Institutions in economics: The old and the new institutionalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61.
Rutherford, M.1995. The old and new institutionalism: Can bridges be built? Journal of Economic IssuesXXIX (2): 443-451.
62.
Schelling, T.1990. Thomas C. Schelling. In Economics and sociology, redefining their boundaries: Conversations with economists and sociologists, ed. R. Swedberg, 186-199. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
63.
Slater, G., and D. Spencer.2000. The uncertain foundations of transaction costs economics. Journal of Economic IssuesXXXIV (1): 61-87.
64.
Sutch, R.1982. Douglass North and the new economic history. In Explorations in the new economic history: Essays in honor of Douglass C. North, ed. R. Ransom, R. Sutch, and G. Walton, 13-38. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
65.
Szirmai, A., B. van Ark, and D. Pilat, eds. 1993. Explaining economic growth: Essays in honour of Angus Maddison. North-Holland: Elsevier.
66.
Therborn, G.1976. Science, class and society: On the formation of sociology and historical materialism. London: New Left Books.
67.
Toye, J.1995. The new institutional economics and its implications for development theory. In The new institutional economics and Third World development, ed. J. Harriss, J. Hunter, and C. Lewis. London and New York: Routledge.
68.
Vandenberg, P.2002. North’s insitutionalism and the prospect of combining theoretical approaches. Cambridge Journal of Economics26 (2): 217-235.
69.
Williamson, O.1975. Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
70.
Williamson, O.. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
71.
World Bank.2002. World development report: Institutions for markets. New York: Oxford University Press.