The unintendedness of the phenomenon that is to be explained is a constraint visible in the various applications and clarifications of invisible-hand explanations. The article casts doubt on such a requirement and proposes a revised account. To have a role in an invisible-hand process, it is argued, agents may very well act with a view to contributing to the occurrence of the social outcome that is to be explained, provided they see what they do as an aggregation of their individual actions rather than as something they jointly perform.
AydinonatE (2008) The Invisible Hand in Economics: How economists explain unintended social consequences. London/New York: Routledge.
2.
BacharachM (2006) Beyond Individual Choice: Teams and frames in games theory, edited by GoldNSugdenR (eds). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BratmanM E (1993) Shared intention. Ethics104(1): 97–113.
4.
BrennanGPettitP (1993) Hands invisible and intangible. Synthèse94(2): 191–225.
5.
CowenT (1998) Do economics use social mechanisms to explain social mechanisms? An analytical approach to social theory. In: HedströmPSwedbergR (eds) Social Mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 125–146.
ElsterJ (1978) Logic and Society. Chichester: Wiley.
8.
ElsterJ (1985) Making Sense of Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
ElsterJ (1987) Le Laboureur et Ses Enfants. Deux essais sur les limites de la rationalité. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
10.
FergusonA (2006[1782, 1767]) An Essay on the History of Civil Society. London: T Cadell.
11.
GausG (2011) Explanation, justification, and emergent properties: An essay on Nozickean metatheory. In: BaderRMMeadowcroftJ (eds) The Cambridge Companion to Nozick’s Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 116–144.
12.
GilbertM (1989) On Social Facts. London/New York: Routledge.
13.
GilbertM (2008) Social convention revisited. Topoi (27): 5–16.
14.
GoldNSugdenR (2007) Collective intentions and team agency. Journal of Philosophy104(3):109–137.
15.
GrimenH (1994) Causally inefficient knowledge and functional explanation. Social Science Information33(1): 117–127.
16.
HayekFA von(1948) Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17.
LewisD (1969) Convention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18.
MäkiU (1990) Practical syllogism, entrepreneurship and the invisible hand. In: LavoieD (ed.) A Critique of the Analytic Hermeneutics of G. H. von Wright: Economics and hermeneutics. London: Routledge, 149–176.
19.
MäkiU (2001) The way the world works (www): Towards an ontology of theory choice. In: MäkiU (ed.) The Economic World View: Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 369–389.
20.
MarxK (1973[1857–1861]) Grundrisse der Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie (Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy), transl. by NicolausM. London: Penguin.
21.
MathiesenK (2002) Searle, collective intentions, and individualism. In: MeggleG (ed.) Social Facts and Collective Intentionality. Frankfurt: Dr Hänsel-Hohenhausen AG, 185–204.
22.
MengerC (1892) On the origins of money. Economic Journal2(6): 239–255.
23.
MillarJ (2006)[1771]) The Origin of the Distinction of Ranks; or, An Inquiry into the Circumstances which Give Rise to Influence and Authority in the Different Members of Society, ed. by GarrettA. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
24.
MillerS (2001) Social Action: A teleological account. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
NozickR (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell, Basic Books.
26.
NozickR (1994) Invisible-hand explanations. American Economic Review84(2): 327–332.
27.
OrléanA (2004) L’Economie des conventions: Définitions et résultats. In: OrléanA (ed.) Analyse Economique des Conventions. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. (2nd edn)
28.
PetsoulasC (2001) Hayek’s Liberalism and Its Origins: His idea of spontaneous order and the Scottish enlightenment. Studies in Social and Political Thought. London: Routledge.
29.
SchellingT C (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: London: Harvard University Press.
30.
SchellingT C (1969) Models of segregation. American Economic Review59(2): 488–493.
31.
SchmidH-B (2009) Plural Action: Between philosophy and the social sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Verlag.
32.
SearleJR (1990) Collective intentions and actions. In: CohenPMorganJPollackM (eds) Intentions in Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 401–415.
33.
SteinerH (1978) Can a social contract be signed by an invisible hand? In: BirnbaumP. (eds) Democracy, Consensus and Social Contract. London/Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
34.
SugdenR (2000) Team preferences. Economics and Philosophy16(2): 175–204.
35.
SugdenR (2003) The logic of team reasoning. Philosophical Explorations6(3): 165–181.
36.
SugdenRGoldN (2007) Collective intentions and team agency. Journal of Philosophy104(3): 109–137.
37.
SugdenRZamarrónI (2006) Finding the key: The riddle of focal points. Journal of Economic Psychology27: 609–621.
38.
TuomelaR (1984) A Theory of Social Action. Dordrecht: Reidel.
