This special issue explores the concept of debt and its ramifications in contemporary landscapes with the intention of altering the themes and terms of a debate imposed by economistic discourse. Briefly going through the crucial issues raised by the social practice of debt: time and creation – unveils that the languages of contemporary archaeology (Plantzos), sociology (Bissonnette), anthropology (Krige), art history (Hadjinicolaou), literary theory (Boletsi and Gourgouris), are ways of allowing for an emancipatory take on the issue of debt.
KaragiannisN (2007) Solidarity within Europe/Solidarity without Europe. European Societies9(1): 3–21.
8.
KaragiannisN (2017) The South as exile. In: WagnerP (ed.) The Moral Mappings of South and North. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 183–216.
9.
KaragiannisN (2019a) Chains of solidarity: Violence and debt. In: KrunkeHPetersenHMannersIJ (eds) Transnational Solidarity: Concept, Challenges and Opportunities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
KaragiannisN (2019b) Ending debts. The question of the tabula rasa in WestEnd. Neue Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, vol. 15, December 2019, no. 2, forthcoming.
11.
KaragiannisNWagnerP (2018) Le sujet-en-dette. Notes pour une sociologie et une philosophie de l’endettement. Revue du MAUSS permanente, 2octobre2018. Available at: http://www.journaldumauss.net/./?Le-sujet-en-dette (accessed 29 July 2019).
12.
LegendreP (1999) Sur la question dogmatique en Occident. Paris: Fayard.
13.
MalamoudCet al. (1980) La dette. Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS.
14.
MarxK (1926[1844]) On the Jewish Question. In: Selected Essays, translated by StenningHJ. London and New York: Leonard Parsons, 40–97.
15.
MarxKEngelsF (1969[1848]) The Communist Manifesto. In: Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, Selected Works, Vol. 1.Moscow: Progress Publishers: 980–137.
