Results from an experiment in Fall 2013 of 902 incoming students at this university are reported. In this experiment, after students were given a basic math assessment to ensure they had the necessary math skills to take a principles of economics course, they were randomly allocated to a treatment or control group to test whether there was a significant impact of test format, calculator use, and calculator type on students’ scores. The interaction of calculator use/type and test format was also tested. The results from this experiment suggest that each treatment had a significant positive impact on students’ assessment scores, with much variation depending on the type of question asked and the level of performance.
AllgoodS.WalstadW. B.SiefgfriedJ. J. (2015). Research on teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 53(2), 285–325.
3.
BallardC.JohnsonM. (2004). Basic math skills and performance in an introductory economics class. Journal of Economic Education, 35(1), 3–23.
4.
BeckerW.JohnstonC. (1999). The relationship between multiple choice and essay response questions in assessing economics understanding. Economic Record, 75, 348–357.
5.
BoyleR. W.FarrerasI. G. (2015). The effect of calculator use on college students’ mathematical performance. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 95–100.
6.
BridgemanB. (1992). A comparison of quantitative questions in open-ended and multiple-choice formats. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(3), 1992.
7.
BridgemanB.HarveyA.BraswellJ. (1995). Effects of calculator use on scores on a test of mathematical reasoning. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(4), 323–340.
8.
BridgemanB.PotenzaM. (1998, April). Effects of an on-screen versus bring-your-own calculator policy on performance on the computerized SAT I: Reasoning test in mathematics [Meeting session]. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME), San Diego, CA.
9.
BucklesS.SiegfriedJ. J. (2006). Using multiple-choice questions to evaluate in-depth learning of economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(1), 48–57.
10.
ChanN.KennedyP. E. (2002). Are multiple-choice exams easier for economics students? A comparison of multiple-choice and “equivalent” constructed-response exam questions. Southern Economic Journal, 68(4), 957–971.
11.
The College Board. (2013). SAT® percentile ranks: 2013 college-bound seniors—Critical reading, mathematics, and writing percentile ranks.
12.
DoransN. J. (1999). Correspondence between ACT and SAT I scores. ETS Research Report Series, 1999(1), 1–18.
13.
DouglasS.SulockJ. (1995). Estimating educational production functions with correction for drops. The Journal of Economic Education, 26(2), 101–112.
14.
DurdenG. C.EllisL. V. (1995). The effects of attendance on student learning in principles of economics. The American Economic Review, 85(2), 343–346.
FrederiksenN. (1984). The real test bias: Influences of testing on teaching and learning. American Psychologist, 39(3), 193–202.
17.
GalloA. A.JohnsonC. K. (2008). Math skills and everyday problem solving. Journal of Economic and Finance Education, 7(1), 7–20.
18.
HaferG. H.HaferR. W. (2002). Do entry-level math skills predict success in principles of economics?Journal of Economics and Economic Education Research, 3(1), 3–12.
19.
HoagJ.BenedictM. E. (2010). What influence does mathematics preparation and performance have on performance in first economics classes?Journal of Economics and Economics Education Research, 11(1), 19–42.
20.
JensenE. J.OwenA. L. (2003). Appealing to good students in introductory economics. The Journal of Economic Education, 34(4), 299–325.
21.
KatzI. R.BennettR. E.BergerA. E. (2000). Effects of response format on difficulty of SAT-mathematics items: It’s not the strategy. Journal of Educational Measurement, 37(1), 39–57.
22.
KoopJ. B. (1982). Calculator use in the community college arithmetic course. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 50–60.
23.
KronckeC.SmythL. (2003). The effectiveness of using electronic slides to teach graphical economic concepts. Journal of Economic and Finance Education, 2(2), 38–46.
24.
MallikG.LodewijksJ. (2010). Student performance in a large first year economics subject: Which variables are significant?Economic Papers: A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy, 29(1), 80–86.
25.
MallikG.ShankarS. (2016). Does prior knowledge of economics and high level mathematics improve student learning in principles of economics?Economic Analysis and Policy, 49(1), 66–73.
26.
Mendez-CarbajoD.MixonF. G.Jr.AsartaC. J. (2018). Can economic education improve entry-level math skills?Perspectives on Economic Education Research, 11(1), 19–40.
27.
MilkmanM.McCoyJ.BrassfieldD. (1995). Some additional evidence on the effect of university math on student performance in principles of economics. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 28(4), 220–229.
28.
O’NeilH. F.Jr.BrownR. S. (2009). Differential effects of question formats in math assessment on metacognition and affect. Applied Measurement in Education, 11(4), 331–351.
29.
OwenA. (2012). Student characteristics, behavior, and performance in economics classes. In HoytG.McGoldrickK. (Eds.), International handbook on teaching and learning economics (pp. 341–350). Edward Elgar Publishing.
30.
PinterM. (2014). Writing to enhance understanding in general mathematics courses. PRIMUS, 24(7), 626–636.
31.
RebeckK.AsartaC. (2012). Methods of assessment in the college economics course. In HoytG.McGoldrickK. (Eds.), International handbook on teaching and learning economics (pp. 177–187). Edward Elgar Publishing.
32.
ScheunemanJ. D.CamaraW. J.CascallarA. S.WendlerC.LawrenceI. (2002). Calculator access, use, and type in relation to performance on the SAT I: Reasoning test in mathematics. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(1), 95–112.
33.
SchuhmannP.McGoldrickK.BurrusR. (2005). Student quantitative literacy: Importance, measurement, and correlation with economic literacy. The American Economist, 49(4), 49–64.
34.
SchwarzR.RichC.AreonsE.PodrabskyT.CookG. (2002, April). An analysis of differential item functioning based on calculator type [Meeting session]. Paper presented at the Meeting of National Council on Measurement in Education, Orleans, LA.
35.
SmythL.KronckeC.Jr. (2005). Principles of economics and the reinforcement of math skills. In MixonF. G.Jr. (Ed.), Shaping the learning curve: Essays on economic education (pp. 26–39). iUniverse.
