To examine debriefing data to understand experiences before, during, and after a restraint (seclusion, chemical, and physical) event from the perspective of inpatients at a large urban mental health and addiction hospital.
Method:
Audits were conducted on a purposeful sample of inpatient charts containing post-restraint event inpatient debrief forms (n = 55). Qualitative data from the forms were analyzed thematically.
Results:
Loss of autonomy and related anger, conflict with staff and other inpatients, and unmet needs were the most common factors precipitating restraint events. Inpatients often reported that increased communication with staff could have prevented restraint. Inpatients described having had various negative emotional states and responses during restraint events, including fear and rejection. Post-restraint, inpatients often desired to leave the unit for fresh air or to engage in leisure activities.
Conclusions:
To our knowledge, our study is the first to use debriefing form data to explore mental health inpatients' experiences of restraint. Inpatients view restraint negatively and do not experience it as a therapeutic intervention. Debriefing, guided by a form, is useful for understanding the inpatient's experience of restraint, and should be used to re-establish the therapeutic relationship and to inform plans of care. In addition, individual and collective inpatient perspectives should inform alternatives to restraint.
LandeweerEGAbmaTAWiddershovenGA. Moral margins concerning the use of coercion in psychiatry. Nurs Ethics. 2011;18(3):304–316.
2.
RecuperoPRPriceMGarveyKARestraint and seclusion in psychiatric treatment settings: Regulation, case law, and risk management. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2011;39(4):465–476.
3.
SailasEFentonM.Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001163.
4.
RabochJKalisovaLNawkaAUse of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: Findings from ten European countries. Psychiatr Serv. 2010;61(10):1012–1017.
5.
BonnerGLoweTRawcliffeDTrauma for all: A pilot study of the subjective experience of physical restraint for mental health inpatients and staff in the UK. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2002;9(4):465–473.
6.
BigwoodSCroweM.‘It's part of the job, but it spoils the job’: A phenomenological study of physical restraint. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2008;17(3):215–222.
7.
EvansDWoodJLambertL.Patient injury and physical restraint devices: A systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(3):274–282.
8.
MartinAKriegHEspositoFReduction of restraint and seclusion through collaborative problem solving: A five-year prospective inpatient study. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(12):1406–1412.
9.
MoranACocomanAScottPARestraint and seclusion: A distressing treatment option?J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009;16(7):599–605.
10.
StubbsB.The manual handling of the aggressive patient: A review of the risk of injury to nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2009;16(4):395–400.
11.
NeedhamHSandsN.Post-seclusion debriefing: A core nursing intervention. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2010;46(3):221–233.
12.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH). Emergency use of chemical restraint, seclusion, and mechanical restraint. Toronto (ON): CAMH; 2008.
13.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Mental Health. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Mental Health Patient Debriefing and Comment Form-Revised 4/06 [Internet]. Boston (MA): Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Mental Health; 2006 [cited 2014 Jul 11]. Available from: http://tnoys.org/wp-content/uploads/PtDebriefngCommentForm.pdf.
14.
BraunVClarkeV.Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
15.
DrakeREWhitleyR.Recovery and severe mental illness: Description and analysis. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59(5):236–242.
16.
JohnsonME. Being restrained: A study of power and powerlessness. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1998;19(3):191–206.
17.
HoekstraTLendemeijerHHGMJansenMGMJ. Seclusion: The inside story. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2004;11(3):276–283.
18.
FaschingbauerKMPeden-McAlpineCTempelW.Use of seclusion: Finding the voice of the patient to influence practice. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2013;51(7):32–38.
19.
El-BadriSMellsopG.Patient and staff perspectives on the use seclusion. Australas Psychiatry. 2008;16(4):248–252.
20.
EzeobeleIEMalechaATMockAPatients' lived seclusion experience in acute psychiatric hospital in the United States: A qualitative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2014;21(4):303–312.
21.
HolmesDKennedySLPerronA.The mentally ill and social exclusion: A critical examination of the use of seclusion from the patient's perspective. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2004;25(6):559–578.
22.
Keski-ValkamaAKoivistoAEronenMForensic and general psychiatric patients' view of seclusion: A comparison study. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2010;21(3):446–461.
23.
KontioRJoffeGPutkonenHSeclusion and restraint in psychiatry: Patients' experiences and practical suggestions on how to improve practices and use alternatives. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2012;48(1):16–24.
24.
Van Der MerweMMuir-CochraneEJonesJImproving seclusion practice: Implications of a review of staff and patient views. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2013;20:203–215.
LarueCDumaisABoyerRThe experience of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric settings: Perspectives of patients. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013;34:317–324.
27.
NovakTScanlanJMcCaulDPilot study of a sensory room in an acute inpatient psychiatric unit. Australas Psychiatry. 2012;20(5):401–406.
28.
ChalmersAHarrisonSMollisonKEstablishing sensory-based approaches in mental health inpatient care: A multidisciplinary approach. Australas Psychiatry. 2012;20(1):35–39.
29.
WynnR.Psychiatric inpatients' experiences with restraint. J Forens Psychiatry Psychol. 2004;15(1):124–144.
30.
MeehanTVermeerCWindsorC.Patients' perceptions of seclusion: A qualitative investigation. J Adv Nurs. 2000;31(2):370–377.
31.
RobertsDCromptonDMilliganERefection on the use of seclusion in an acute mental health facility. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2009;47(10):25–31.
32.
BonnerGWellmanN.Postincident review of aggression and violence in mental health settings. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010;48(7):35–40.
33.
CummingsKSGrandfieldSAColdwellCM. Caring with comfort rooms. Reducing seclusion and restraint use in psychiatric facilities. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2010;48(6):26–30.
34.
van der SchaafPSDusseldorpEKeuningFMImpact of the physical environment of psychiatric wards on the use of seclusion. Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202:142–149.
35.
BowersLRossJNijmanHThe scope for replacing seclusion with time out in acute inpatient psychiatry in England. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(4):826–835.
36.
CurtisSGeslerWFabianKTherapeutic landscapes in hospital design: A qualitative assessment by staff and service users of the design of a new mental health inpatient unit. Environ Plann C. 2007;25(4):591.
37.
GouletMHLarueCStaffordMProfiles of patients admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit: Secluded with or without restraint. Can J Psychiatry. 2013;58(9):546–550.
38.
DackCRossJBowersL.The relationship between attitudes towards different containment measures and their usage in a national sample of psychiatric inpatients. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2012;19(7):577–586.
39.
GeorgievaIMulderCLWierdsmaA.Patients' preference and experiences of forced medication and seclusion. Psychiatr Q. 2012;83(1):1–13.
