Attitudes toward math (ATM) predict math achievement. Negative ATM are associated with avoidance of math content, while positive ATM are associated with exerting more effort on math tasks. Recent literature highlights the importance of considering interactions between ATM and math skill in examining relations to achievement. This study investigated, for the first time, the effects of the interaction between math skill and ATM on the neurocognitive basis of arithmetic processing. We examined the effect of this interaction using a single-digit multiplication task in 9- to 12-year-old children. Results showed that higher math skill was correlated with less activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), and positive ATM were correlated with less activation in the left IFG. The relation between ATM and the neural basis of multiplication varied depending on math skill. Only among children with lower math skill, positive ATM were associated with greater activation of the left IFG. The results suggest that positive ATM in low-skill children might encourage them to more fully engage the neurocognitive systems underlying controlled effort and retrieval of multiplication facts. Our results highlight the importance of examining the role of both attitudinal and cognitive factors on the neural basis of arithmetic development.
AikenL. R. (1970). Attitudes toward mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 40, 551–596. doi:10.3102/00346543040004551
2.
ArsalidouM.TaylorM. J. (2011). Is 2+2 = 4? Meta-analyses of brain areas needed for numbers and calculations. NeuroImage, 54, 2382–2393. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.009
3.
AshcraftM. H.FaustM. W. (1994). Mathematics anxiety and mental arithmetic performance: An exploratory investigation. Cognition and Emotion, 8, 97–125. doi:10.1080/02699939408408931
4.
BadreD.PoldrackR. A.Paré-blagoevE. J.InslerR. Z.WagnerA. D. (2005). Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 47, 907–918. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.023
5.
BadreD.WagnerA. D. (2007). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2883–2901. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.015
6.
BanduraA. (1982). The self and mechanisms of agency. In SulsJ. (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
BertelettiI.PradoJ.BoothJ. (2014). Children with mathematical learning disability fail in recruiting verbal and numerical brain regions when solving simple multiplication problems. Cortex, 57, 143–155. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.04.001
8.
BlackwellL. S.TrzesniewskiK. H.DweckC. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
9.
BookheimerS. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 25, 151–188. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946
10.
BoothJ. R. (2010). Development and language. In KoobG.Le MoalM.ThompsonR. F. (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of Behavioral Neuroscience (pp. 387–395). Oxford, UK: Academic Press.
11.
BrownV. L.CroninM. E.BryantD. H. (2012). Test of mathematical abilities (3rd ed.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
12.
ChenL.BaeS. R.BattistaC.QinS.ChenT.EvansT. M.MenonV. (2018). Positive attitude toward math supports early academic success: Behavioral evidence and neurocognitive mechanisms. Psychological Science, 29, 390–402. doi:10.1177/0956797617735528
13.
CriaudM.BoulinguezP. (2013). Have we been asking the right questions when assessing response inhibition in go/no-go tasks with fMRI? A meta-analysis and critical review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 37, 11–23. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.11.003
14.
CunninghamW. A.ZelazoP. D. (2007). Attitudes and evaluations: A social cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 97–104. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.005
DeMarsC. (1999, April). Does the relationship between motivation and performance differ with ability?Paper presented at the Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
17.
De SmedtB.HollowayI. D.AnsariD. (2011). Effects of problem size and arithmetic operation on brain activation during calculation in children with varying levels of arithmetical fluency. NeuroImage, 57, 771–781. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.037
18.
D’EspositoM.DetreJ. A.AlsopD. C.ShinR. K.AtlasS.GrossmanM. (1995). The neural basis of the central executive system of working memory. Nature, 378, 279–281. doi:10.1038/378279a0
19.
EklundA.NicholsT. E.KnutssonH. (2016). Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7900-7905.
20.
FisherS. L.FordJ. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51, 397–420. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00731.x
21.
GottfriedA.MarcoulidesG.GottfriedA.OliverP.GuerinD. (2007). Multivariate latent change modeling of developmental decline in academic intrinsic math motivation and achievement: Childhood through adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 317–327. doi:10.1177/0165025407077752
22.
GrabnerR. H.AnsariD.ReishoferG.SternE.EbnerF.NeuperC. (2007). Individual differences in mathematical competence predict parietal brain activation during mental calculation. NeuroImage, 38, 346–356. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.041
23.
HembreeR. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33–46. doi:10.2307/749455
24.
HemmingsB.KayR. (2010). Prior achievement, effort, and mathematics attitude as predictors of current achievement. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(2), 41–58. doi:10.1007/BF03216921
IschebeckA.ZamarianL.SiedentopfC.KoppelstätterF.BenkeT.FelberS.DelazerM. (2006). How specifically do we learn? Imaging the learning of multiplication and subtraction. NeuroImage, 30, 1365–1375. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.016
27.
JordanN. C.LevineS. C. (2009). Socioeconomic variation, number competence, and mathematics learning difficulties in young children. Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 15, 60–68. doi:10.1002/ddrr.46
28.
KaoY. C.DavisE. S.GabrieliJ. D. (2005). Neural correlates of actual and predicted memory formation. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1776–1783.
29.
KaufmannL.WoodG.RubinstenO.HenikA. (2011). Meta-analyses of developmental fMRI studies investigating typical and atypical trajectories of number processing and calculation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 36, 763–787. doi:10.1080/87565641.2010.549884
30.
LeikinR.ZaslavskyO. (1997). Facilitating student interactions in mathematics in a cooperative learning setting. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 331–354. doi:10.2307/749784
31.
LipnevichA. A.MaccannC.KrummS.BurrusJ.RobertsR. D. (2011). Mathematics attitudes and mathematics outcomes of U.S. and Belarusian middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 105–118. doi:10.1037/a0021949
32.
LoganS.MedfordE.HughesN. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124–128. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
33.
LyonsI. M.BeilockS. L. (2012). Mathematics anxiety: Separating the math from the anxiety. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 2102–2110. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr289
34.
MaX.KishorN. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 26–47. doi:10.2307/749662
35.
MataM. L.MonteiroV.PeixotoF. (2012). Attitudes towards mathematics: Effects of individual, motivational, and social support factors. Child Development Research, 2012, Article 876028. doi:10.1155/2012/876028
36.
MazaikaP.HoeftF.GloverG.ReissA. (2009, June). Methods and software for fMRI analysis for clinical subjects. Paper presented at the Organization of Human Brain Mapping, 15th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(09)70238-1
37.
MazzoccoM. M.HanichL. B.NoederM. M. (2012). Primary school age students’ spontaneous comments about math reveal emerging dispositions linked to later mathematics achievement. Child Development Research, 2012, Article 170310. doi:10.1155/2012/170310
38.
NealeD. C. (1969). The role of attitudes in learning mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 16, 631–640.
39.
NicolaidouM.PhilippouG. (2003). Attitudes towards mathematics, self-efficacy and achievement in problem solving. In MariottiM. A. (Ed.), European research in mathematics education III (pp. 1–11). Pisa, Italy: University of Pisa.
40.
O’ConnerS. A.MirandaK. (2002). The linkages among family structure, self-concept, effort, and performance on mathematics achievement of American high school students by race. American Secondary Education, 31, 72–95.
41.
PetersL.De SmedtB. (2018). Arithmetic in the developing brain: A review of brain imaging studies. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 265–279.
42.
PhanK. L.WagerT.TaylorS. F.LiberzonI. (2002). Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: A meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI. NeuroImage, 16, 331–348. doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1087
43.
PradoJ.MutrejaR.BoothJ. R. (2014). Developmental dissociation in the neural responses to simple multiplication and subtraction problems. Developmental Science, 17, 537–552. doi:10.1111/desc.12140
44.
PradoJ.MutrejaR.ZhangH.MehtaR.DesrochesA. S.MinasJ. E.BoothJ. R. (2011). Distinct representations of subtraction and multiplication in the neural systems for numerosity and language. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 1932–1947. doi:10.1002/hbm.21159
45.
ReynaV. F.BrainerdC. J. (2007). The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 147–159. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.010
46.
ReynoldsA. J.WalbergH. J. (1992). A process model of mathematics achievement and attitude. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 306–328. doi:10.2307/749308
47.
RiveraS. M.ReissA. L.EckertM. A.MenonV. (2005). Developmental changes in mental arithmetic : Evidence for increased functional specialization in the left inferior parietal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 15, 1779–1790. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi055
48.
Rivera-BatizF. L. (1992). Quantitative literacy and the likelihood of employment among young adults in the united states. The Journal of Human Resources, 27, 313–328. doi:10.2307/145737
SinghK.GranvilleM.DikaS. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95, 323–332. doi:10.1080/00220670209596607
51.
ValentijnS. A. M.HillR.Van HoorenS. A. H.BosmaH.Van BoxtelM. P. J.JollesJ.PondsR. W. (2006). Memory self-efficacy predicts memory performance: Results from a 6-year follow-up study. Psychology and Aging, 21, 165–172. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.165
52.
WechslerD. (1999). Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. New York, NY: Psychological Corporation/Harcourt Brace.
53.
WoodcockR. W.McGrewK. S.MatherN. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside.
ZamarianL.IschebeckA.DelazerM. (2009). Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews neuroscience of learning arithmetic: Evidence from brain imaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 33, 909–925. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.03.005
56.
ZhangR.GengX.LeeT. M. (2017). Large-scale functional neural network correlates of response inhibition: An fMRI meta-analysis. Brain Structure and Function, 222, 3973–3990. doi:10.1007/s00429-017-1443-x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
