Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Informed by a constructivist-based, student-adaptive pedagogical approach, this study explores the benefits of teacher–learner discourse moves for the mathematics learning of students with learning disabilities (LD). During a constructivist teaching experiment for nurturing the multiplicative reasoning and problem solving of five third-grade students with school-identified LD, we analyzed the global trends and detailed dynamics of teacher–student interactions with statistical discourse analysis. We found that the teacher’s discourse moves to support each individual student’s problem solving helped engage them in mathematical reasoning, which improved their problem-solving performance. Thus, this study contributes to knowledge in the field of special education by (a) specifying ways in which discourse-oriented mathematics instruction can help each student with LD and (b) showcasing a novel statistical analysis of teacher–student discourse.

Keywords

elementary mathematics discourse analysis discourse-oriented instruction instructional strategies learning difficulties learning disabilities mathematical problem solving multiplicative reasoning student-adaptive pedagogy student-adaptive teaching/learning thinking/cognition

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baxter

Woodward

Olson

(2001). Effects of reform-based mathematics instruction on low achievers in five third-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 529–547. doi:10.1086/499686

Baxter

Woodward

Voorhies

Wong

(2002). We talk about it, but do they get it? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17, 173–185. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00043

Benjamini

Krieger

A. M.

Yekutieli

(2006). Adaptive linear step-up procedures that control the false discovery rate. Biometrika, 93, 491–507. doi:10.1093/biomet/93.3.491

Bishop

J. P.

Whitacre

(2010). Intellectual work: The depth of mathematical discourse and its relationship to student learning. In Brosnan

Erchick

D. B.

Flevares

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the North American chapter of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (pp. 401–409). Columbus: Ohio State University.

Blanton

M. L.

Westbrook

Carter

(2005). Using valsiner’s zone theory to interpret teaching practices in mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8, 5–33. doi:10.1007/s10857-005-0456-1

Chiu

M. M.

Lehmann-Willenbrock

(2016). Statistical discourse analysis: Modeling sequences of individual behaviors during group interactions across time. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 20, 242–258. doi:10.1037/gdn0000048

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2012). Standards for mathematics practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice

Fuchs

L. S.

Malone

Schumacher

R. F.

Namkung

Hamlett

C. L.

Jordan

N. C.

. . . Changas

(2016). Supported self-explaining during faction intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 493–508. doi:10.1037/edu0000073

Herbel-Eisenmann

B. A.

Otten

(2011). Mapping mathematics in classroom discourse. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42, 451–485. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.42.5.0451

10.

Hord

Tzur

Xin

Y. P.

Kenney

Woodward

(2016). Overcoming a 4th grader’s challenges with working-memory via constructivist-based pedagogy and strategic scaffolds: Tia’s solutions to challenging multiplicative tasks. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 44, 13–33. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.09.002

11.

Hunt

J. H.

Tzur

Westenskow

(2016). Evolution of unit fraction conceptions in two fifth-graders with a learning disability: An exploratory study. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18, 182–208. doi:10.1080/10986065.2016.1183089

12.

Kapp

(2006). Evaluation: Thought unit. Retrieved from http://karlkapp.com/evaluation-thought-unit/

13.

Kennedy

(2008). A guide to econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell. doi:10.1080/00220489909595943

14.

Krussel

Edwards

Springer

G. T.

(2004). The teacher’s discourse moves: A framework for analyzing discourse in mathematics classrooms. School Science and Mathematics, 104, 307–312. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2004.tb18249.x

15.

Ladson-Billings

(1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 465–491. doi:10.3102/00028312032003465

16.

Liu

Xin

Y. P.

(2017). Eliciting repair of mathematics explanations of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 132–145. doi:10.1177/0731948716657496

17.

National Assessment of Educational Progress Result. (2015). Percentage of fourth-grade students at or above proficient lower compared to 2013. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#mathematics/acl?grade=4

18.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org

19.

Nordquist

(2012). Grammar & Composition. Retrieved from http://grammar.about.com/od/d/g/discourseterm.htm

20.

Otis

A. J.

Lennon

R. T.

(1995). Otis-Lennon school ability test (7th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education. doi:10.1007/springerreference_184178

21.

Pierson

J. L.

(2008). The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas at Austin, USA. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46328-5_1

22.

Pirbhai-Illich

Pete

Martin

(2017). Culturally responsive pedagogy: Working towards decolonization, indigeneity, and interculturalism. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave.

23.

Steffe

L. P.

Cobb

(1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3844-7

24.

Steffe

L. P.

Thompson

P. W.

von Glasersfeld

(2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In Kelly

A. E.

Lesh

R. A.

(Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781410602725

25.

Stein

M. K.

Grover

B. W.

Henningsen

(1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 455–488. doi:10.3102/00028312033002455

26.

Tzur

Johnson

H. L.

McClintock

Kenney

R. H.

Xin

Y. P.

. . . Jin

(2013). Distinguishing schemes and tasks in children’s development of multiplicative reasoning. Philippine Journal of Nursing, 7, 85–101.

27.

Vergnaud

(1983). Multiplicative structures. In Lesh

Landau

(Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127–174). New York, NY: Academic Press.

28.

Wagner

(2006). Transfer in pieces. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 1–71. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2401_1

29.

Wechsler

(2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation. doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1501_8

30.

Xin

Y. P.

(2012). Conceptual model-based problem solving: Teach students with learning difficulties to solve math problems. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-104-7_1

31.

Xin

Y. P.

Liu

Jones

Tzur

S. I. L.

(2016). A preliminary discourse analysis of constructivist-oriented math instruction for a student with learning disabilities. Journal of Educational Research, 109, 436–447. doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.979910

32.

Xin

Y. P.

Tzur

(2008). Nurturing multiplicative reasoning in students with learning disabilities in a computerized conceptual-modeling environment (National Science Foundation Funded Project). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University.

33.

Xin

Y. P.

Wiles

Lin

(2008). Teaching conceptual model-based word-problem story grammar to enhance mathematics problem solving. The Journal of Special Education, 42, 163–178. doi:10.1177/0022466907312895

34.

Xin

Y. P.

Zhang

(2009). Exploring a conceptual model-based approach to teaching situated word problems. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 427–441. doi:10.3200/JOER.102.6.427-442

35.

Xin

Y. P.

Zhang

Park

J. Y.

Tom

Whipple

(2011). A comparison of two mathematics problem-solving strategies: Facilitate algebra-readiness. The Journal of Educational Research, 104, 381–395. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.487080

36.

Yackel

Cobb

(1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 458–447. doi:10.2307/749877

Linking Teacher–Learner Discourse With Mathematical Reasoning of Students With Learning Disabilities: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References