This study developed the Place Attachment for Community-Dwelling Older Adults (PACOA) scale and evaluated its psychometric properties. The PACOA was developed through a qualitative study and expert panels. A pilot study confirmed the 19-item PACOA which included five factors (meaning of life, dependency, feeling “in place,” continuity, and social inclusion) were extracted. This model explained 60.803% of the variance. Cronbach’s α of the PACOA and its subscales were .853 and .670 to .863, respectively, whereas the correlations between the PACOA and its subscales were .580 to .725 (p < .01). The criterion validity and test–retest reliability were .678 (p < .01) and r = .654 (p < .01). Our findings suggest that the PACOA is an indicator of the emotional connection between older adults and their places of residence. Future studies should address the older adult–place fit, the future connection characteristics, and the influence of place attachment on older adults’ healthy lifestyle behaviors.
AhnM.KwonJ.KangJ. (2017). Supporting aging in place well: Findings from a cluster analysis of the reasons for aging in place and perceptions of well-being. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/7033464817748779
2.
ChangS. K. (2012). Relationship between neighborhood outdoor space perception and place attachment. National Cheng Kung University.
3.
CrossJ. E. (2003, August). Conceptualizing community attachment [Conference session]. Rural Sociological Society Annual Meeting, Montreal, QC, Canada.
4.
CutchinM. P.OwenS. V.ChangP. J. (2003). Becoming “at home” in assisted living residences: Exploring place integration processes. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences, B, 58(4), s234–s243.
5.
DroseltisO.VignolesV. L. (2010). Towards an integrative model of place identification: Dimensionality and predicators of intrapersonal-level place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 23–34.
6.
FalkH.WijkH.PerssonL. O.FalkK. (2013). A sense of home in residential care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 27(4), 999–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12011
7.
FinlayJ. M.GauglerJ. E.KaneR. L. (2020). Ageing in the margins: Expectations of and struggles for “a good place to grow old” among low-income older Minnesotans. Ageing & Society, 40(4), 759-783. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1800123X
8.
GrahamM. E.FabriciusA. (2017). Beyond “Home-Like” design: Visitor responses to an immersive creative space in a Canadian long-term care facility. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 38, 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464817743333
9.
Hillcoat-NalletambyS.OggJ. (2014). Moving beyond “ageing in place”: Older people’s dislikes about their home and neighbourhood environments as a motive for wishing to move. Ageing & Society, 34(10), 1771–1796. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X13000482
10.
HsuP. T. (2017). The effects of the seniors social participation app. National Yang-Ming University.
11.
LagerD.HovenB.MejieringL. (2012). Places that matter: Place attachment and wellbeing of older Antillean migrants in the Netherlands. European Spatial Research and Policy, 19(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10105-012-0007-6
12.
LawtonM. P. (1986). Environment and aging. Center for the Study of Aging.
13.
LewickaM. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years?Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207-230. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
14.
LiuH. H. J.WangM. Y.HiromichiW. (2011). The analysis of the development of the dimensions of the place attachment construct. Journal of Commercial Modernization, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.6132/JCM.2011.6.1.01
15.
LowS. M.AltmanI. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In AltmanI.LowS. M. (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). Plenum Press.
16.
MartinezI. J.DuenasH. R.OnisV. M. C.AguadoT. C.AlbertC. C.LuqueL. R. (2001). Spanish language adaptation and validation of the Pfeiffer’s questionnaire (SPMSQ) to detect cognitive deterioration in people over 65 years of age. Medicina Clinica, 117(4), 129–134.
17.
MolonyS. L.McDonaldD. D.Palmisano-MillsC. (2007). Psychometric testing of an instrument to measure the experience of home. Research in Nursing & Health, 30, 518–530.
18.
MoninJ. K.SchulzR.KershawT. S. (2013). Caregiving spouses’ attachment orientations and the physical and psychological health of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease. Aging Mental Health, 17(4), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2012.747080
RowlesG. D. (2017). Being in place, identity and place attachment in later life. In SkinnerM.AndrewsG.CutchinE. (Eds.), Geographical gerontology: Concepts and approaches (pp. 203–215). Routledge.
21.
ScannellL.GiffordR. (2014). Chapter 9: The psychology of place attachment. In GiffordR. (Ed.), Environmental psychology: Principles and practices (pp. 272-300). Optimal Books.
22.
StonesD.GulliferJ. (2016). At home it’s just so much easier to be yourself: Older adults’ perceptions of ageing in place. Aging & Society, 36(3), 449–481. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X14001214
23.
Van AsscheL.LuytenP.BruffaertsR.PersoonsP.van de VenL.VandenbulckeM. (2013). Attachment in old age: Theoretical assumptions, empirical findings and implications for clinical practice. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.10.003
24.
WilesJ. L.AllenR. E. S.PalmerA. J.HaymanK. J.KeelingS.KerseN. (2009). Older people and their social spaces: A study of well-being and attachment to place in Aotearoa New Zealand. Social Science & Medicine, 68(4), 664–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.11.030
25.
WilesJ. L.LeibingA.GubermanN.ReeveJ.AllenR. E. (2012). The meaning of “aging in place” to older people. Gerontologist, 52(3), 357–366. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnr098. Epub 2011 Oct 7
26.
WilliamsD. R.VaskeJ. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Society of American Foresters, 49(6), 830–840.
27.
YangW. L. (2017). Perception of residence attachment among community-dwelling elderly. National Yang-Ming University.
