Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As increasing numbers of adults are living longer and remaining in their communities as they age, city planners and leaders are exploring how cities need to adapt to ensure their community is age-friendly and a good place for residents to age-in-place. Using secondary data collected from mid-Atlantic city residents aged 45+ years, quantitative analyses were conducted to determine what makes a community a good place to live and grow old. Path model analyses revealed significant relationships among self-reported quality of life and the beliefs that the City and the neighborhood were good places to live and grow old. Features of the built environment and perceived help from neighbors were significantly correlated to separate factors in the models, but not significant contributors to the models. Findings support conceptualizing age-friendly community models and community initiatives using a neighborhood-level lens and engaging older residents to capture the context of their lives and lived experiences.

Keywords

quality of life successful aging community age-friendly livability urban planning aging-in-place neighborhoods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alley

Liebig

Pynoos

Banerjee

Choi

I. H.

(2007). Creating elder-friendly communities: Preparations for an aging society. Housing for the Elderly: Housing and Practice Issues, 49, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J083v49n01_01

AARP. (2017). Can you afford to age in place? https://www.aarp.org/money/budgeting-saving/info-2017/costs-of-aging-in-place.html

AARP. (2018). AARP Livability Index. https://livabilityindex.aarp.org/

AARP. (2019a). AARP network of age-friendly states and communities. https://www.aarp.org/content/dam/aarp/livable-communities/age-friendly-network/2020/AARP-NAFSC-Booklet-20200326.pdf

AARP. (2019b). Livable communities. In Office of Policy Development and Integration (Ed.), AARP policy book 2019-2020. https://policybook.aarp.org/policy-book/livable-communities

Brown

S. C.

Mason

C. A.

Lombard

J. L.

Martinez

Plater-Zyberk

Spokane

A. R.

Newman

F. L.

Pantin

Szapocznik

(2009). The relationship of built environment to perceived social support and psychological distress in Hispanic elders: The role of “eyes on the street.” The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 64, 2234–2246. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbn011

Buffel

Phillipson

(2018). A manifesto for the age-friendly movement: Developing a new urban agenda. Journal of Aging & Social Policy, 30, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0895940.2018.14330414

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Healthy places terminology. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/terminology.htm

Cerin

(2019). Building the evidence for an ecological model of cognitive health. Health & Place, 60, 102206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.102206

10.

Chaskin

R. J.

(1998). Neighborhood as a unit of planning and action: A heuristic approach. Journal of Planning Literature, 13, 11–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541229801300102

11.

Chaudhury

Oswald

(2019). Advance understanding of person-fit environment interaction in later life: One step further. Journal of Aging Studies, 51, 100821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2019.100821

12.

Choi

M. S.

Daebelko-Schoeny

White

(2020). Access to employment, volunteer activities, and community events and perceptions of age-friendliness: The role of social connections. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39, 1016–1024. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464819847588

13.

Costa-Font

(2013). Housing related well-being in older people: The impact of environmental and financial influences. Urban Studies, 50, 657–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012456247

14.

Coulton

C. J.

Jennings

M. Z.

Chan

(2013). How big is my neighborhood? Individual and contextual effects on perceptions of neighborhood scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9550-6

15.

Crimmins

E. M.

Zhang

Saito

(2016). Trends over 4 decades in disability-free life expectancy in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 106, 1287–1293. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303120

16.

Finney

S. J.

DiStefano

(2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269–314). Information Age Publishing.

17.

Firestone

S. K.

Keyes

Greenhouse

(2018). Planners ad aging professionals collaborate for livable communities. Working With Older People, 22, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/WWOP-12-2017-0035

18.

Frank

L. D.

Sallis

J. F.

Saelens

B. E.

Leary

Cain

Conway

T. L.

Hess

P. M.

(2010). The development of a walkability index: Application to the Neighborhood Quality of Life Study. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44, 924–933. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.058701

19.

Frumkin

(2003). Healthy places: Exploring the evidence. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1451–1456. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.93.9.1451

20.

Gitlin

L. N.

(2003). Conducting research n home environments: Lessons learned and new directions. The Gerontologist, 43, 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/43.5.628

21.

Greenfield

E. A.

Oberlink

Scharlach

A. E.

Neal

M. B.

Stafford

P. B.

(2015). Age-friendly community initiatives: Conceptual issues and key questions. The Gerontologist, 55, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv005

22.

Greenfield

E. A.

Reyes

(2014). Continuity and change in relationships with neighbors: Implications for psychological well-being in middle and late life. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 704, 607–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu084

23.

Grogan-Kaylor

Wooley

Mowbray

Reischl

T. M.

Gilster

Karb

Macfarlane

Gant

Alaimo

(2006). Predictors of neighborhood satisfaction. Journal of Community Practice, 14, 27–50. https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n04_03

24.

Guest

A. M.

Cover

J. K.

Matsueda

R. L.

Kubrin

C. E.

(2006). Neighboring context and neighboring ties. City & Community, 5, 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6040.2006.00189.x

25.

Habitat: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements. (1976). The Vancouver declaration on human settlements. UN Habitat. http://mirror.unhabitat.org/downloads/docs/The_Vancouver_Declaration.pdf

26.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.

27.

Jackson

R. J.

Kochtitzky

(2001). Creating a health environment: The impact of the built environment on public health [Monograph Series]. Sprawl Watch Clearinghouse.

28.

Keyes

Benavides

A. D.

(2017). Local government adoption of age friendly policies: An integrated model of responsiveness, multi-level governance and public entrepreneurship. Public Administration Quarterly, 41, 149–185. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26383387

29.

Keyes

Benavides

A. D.

(2019). Responsive management: Municipal leadership for an aging population. Journal of Public Management & Social Policy, 26, 119–135.

30.

Kim

Schmocker

J.-D.

Nakamura

Uno

Iwamoto

(2020). Integrated impacts of public transport travel and travel satisfaction on quality of life of older people. Practice, 138, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.04.019

31.

Konig

Raue

D’Ambrosio

L. A.

Coughlin

(2019). Physical and emotional support of the neighborhood for older adults: A comparison of the United States and Germany. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 62, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.008

32.

Kubendran

Soll

Irving

(2017). Best cities for successful aging 2017. Milken Institute. https://milkeninstitute.org/reports/best-cities-successful-aging-2017

33.

Kweon

B.-S.

Sullivan

W. C.

Wiley

A. R.

(1998). Green spaces and the social integration of inner-city older adults. Environment and Behavior, 30, 832–858. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659803000605

34.

Lehning

Sharlach

Wolf

J. P.

(2012). An emerging typology of community aging initiatives. Journal of Community Practice, 20, 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2012.700175

35.

Levasseur

Dubois

M.-F.

Genereux

Menec

Raina

Roy

Gabaude

Couturier

St-Pierre

(2017). Capturing how age-friendly communities foster positive health, social participation and health equity: A study protocol of key components and processes that promote population health in aging Canadians. BMC Public Health, 17, Article 502. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4392-7

36.

Levasseur

Genereux

Bruneau

J.-F.

Vannesse

Chabot

Beaulac

Bedard

M.-M.

(2015). Importance of proximity to resources and to recreational facilities, social support, transportation and Neighbourhood security for mobility and social participation in older adults: Results from a scoping study. BMC Public Health, 105, 1718–1725. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1824-0

37.

Menec

V. H.

Means

Keating

Parkhurst

Eales

(2011). Conceptualizing age-friendly communities. Canadian Journal on Aging, 30, 479–493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980811000237

38.

Menec

V. H.

Newall

N. E. G.

Nowicki

(2016). Assessing communities’ age-friendliness: How congruent are subjective versus objective assessments? Journal of Applied Gerontology, 35, 549–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464814542612

39.

National Research Council. (1988). Urban change and poverty. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/1096

40.

Northridge

M. E.

Scalar

(2003). A joint urban planning and public health framework: Contribution to health impact assessment. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 118–121. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.1.118

41.

Ramaswami

Russell

A. G.

Culligan

P. J.

Sharma

K. R.

Kumar

(2016). Meta-principles for developing smart, sustainable, and healthy cities. Science, 352, 940–943. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf7160

42.

Rowles

G. D.

Watkins

J. F.

(2003). History, habit, heart and hearth: On making spaces into places. In Schaie

K. W.

Wahl

H.-H.

Mollenkopf

Oswald

(Eds.), Aging independently: Living arrangements and mobility (pp. 77–96). Springer.

43.

Ruth

Franklin

R. S.

(2014). Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Applied Geography, 49, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.018

44.

Sampson

R. J.

Raudenbush

S. W.

Earls

(1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5328.918

45.

Satorra

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis (UCLA Statistics Series No. 260). University of California.

46.

Schulz

Northridge

M. E.

(2004). Social determinants of health: Implications for environmental health promotion. Health Education & Behavior, 31, 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104265598

47.

Spring

(2018). Short- and long-term impacts of neighborhood built environment on self-rated health of older adults. The Gerontologist, 58, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx119

48.

Stephens

Szabo

Allen

Alpass

(2018). Livable environments and the quality of life of older people: An ecological perspective. The Gerontologist, 59, 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny043

49.

Talen

Menzozzi

Schaefer

(2015). What is a great neighborhood? An analysis of APA’s top-rated places. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81, 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2015.1067573

50.

Warner

M. E.

Homsy

G. C.

Morken

L. J.

(2017). Planning for aging in place: Stimulating a market and government response. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 37, 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X1662824

51.

Wenger

G. C.

(1990). The special role of friends and neighbors. Journal of Aging Studies, 4, 149–169.

52.

Wood

Frank

L. D.

Giles-Corti

(2010). Sense of community and its relationship with walking and neighborhood design. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 1381–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.021

53.

Wood

Shannon

Bulsara

Pikora

McCormack

Giles-Corti

(2008). The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: An exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents’ perceptions of safety. Health & Place, 14, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004

54.

World Health Organization. (2002). Active ageing: A policy framework. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/active_ageing/en/

55.

World Health Organization. (2007). Global age friendly cities: A guide. https://www.who.int/ageing/publications/age_friendly_cities_guide/en/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB