Federal narcotics sentencing policy, most notably for cocaine, has been criticized in regard to its excessive severity and racially disparate outcomes. Crack cocaine was heavily portrayed in the media during the 1980s as a dire social threat directly worsening the crime rate, a threat taken seriously as indicated by greater legislative enactment of mandatory minimums specifically targeting narcotics offenses. The research here uses a theoretical-mixed methodological symmetry (focal concerns perspective—content/regression analysis) to explore media portrayal of, and case outcomes for, crack versus powder cocaine offenders. Media portrayals of powder and crack cocaine offenders are considered through examination of USA today articles. These media portrayals are compared with official outcomes through a temporally corresponding regression analysis of federal crack and powder cocaine offenders from federal district court. Findings inform discussion of policy implications and invite scrutiny of media construction of crime problems.
Abrahamson, M. ( 1983). Social research methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1991). An integration of theories to explain judicial discretion . Social Problems, 38, 247-266.
3.
Albonetti, C.A. ( 1997). Sentencing under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Effects of defendant characteristics, guilty pleas, and departures on sentence outcomes for drug offenses, 1991-1992. Law and Society Review, 31, 789-822.
4.
Angeli, David H. ( 1997). A ‘‘second look’’ at crack cocaine sentencing policies: One more try for federal equal protection. American Criminal Law Review, 34, 1211-1241.
5.
Beckett, K., & Sasson, T. ( 2000). The politics of injustice: Crime and punishment in America . Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
6.
Berg, B.L. ( 1986). Arbitrary arbitration: Diverting juveniles into the justice system. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 37, 31-42.
7.
Berg, B.L. ( 2004). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
Biskupic, J. ( 2000, September 22). Drug-testing case goes to high court. USA Today, p. A3.
9.
Bushway, S., & Piehl, A. ( 2007). Social science research and the legal threat to presumptive sentencing guidelines. Criminology and Public Policy, 6, 461-482.
10.
Cauchon, D. ( 1999, November 9). Senate might revise cocaine sentencing. USA Today, p. A4.
11.
Caulkins, J.P., Rydell, C.P., Schwabe, W.L., & Chiesa, J. ( 1998). Are mandatory minimum drug sentences cost effective? Corrections Management Quarterly, 2, 68-73.
12.
Chiricos, T. ( 1996). Moral panic as ideology: Drugs, violence, race and punishment in America. In M. Lynch & E. B. Patterson (Eds.), Justice with prejudice: Race and criminal justice in America (pp. 19-48). New York: Harrow and Heston.
13.
Chiricos, T. ( 2004). Media, moral panics and the politics of crime control . In G. Cole, M. G. Gertz, & A. Bunger (Eds.), The criminal justice system: Politics and policies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
14.
Chiricos, T., & Bales, B. ( 1991). Unemployment and punishment: An empirical assessment . Criminology, 29, 701-724.
15.
Cohen, S. ( 1972): Folk Devils and Moral Panics: the creation of the mods and rockers. London: MacGibbon and Kee.
16.
Cole, D. ( 2000, February 3). Denying felons vote hurts them, society. USA Today, p. A17.
17.
Creswell, J. ( 1995). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
Dabney, D.A. ( 1993). Impaired nursing: Nurses attitudes and perceptions about drug use and drug theft. Master’s Thesis. Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana, PA.
19.
Daly, K. ( 1987). Structure and practice of familiar-based justice in a criminal court. Law and Society Review, 21, 267-290.
20.
Duffee, D.E. ( 1990). Explaining criminal justice: Community theory and criminal justice reform. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
21.
Durham, A.A., Elrod, H.P., & Kinkade, P.T. ( 1995). Images of crime and justice. Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 143-152.
22.
Eisenstein, J., & Jacob, H. ( 1977). Felony justice: An organizational analysis of criminal courts. Boston, MA: Little & Brown.
23.
Engen, R.L., Gainey, R.R., Crutchfield, R.D., & Weis, J.G. ( 2003). Discretion and disparity under sentencing guidelines: The role of departures and structured sentencing alternatives. Criminology, 41, 99-130.
24.
Fagen, J., & Chin, K. ( 1990). Violence as regulation and social control in the distribution of crack. In M. de la rosa, B. Gropper, & E. Lambert (Eds.), Drugs and violence: Causes, correlates and consequences . U.S. Government Printing Office. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
25.
Farrell, A. ( 2004). Measuring judicial and prosecutorial discretion: Sex and race disparities in departures from the federal sentencing guidelines . Justice Research and Policy, 6, 45-78.
26.
Feeley, M. ( 1983). Court reform on trial. New York: Basic Books.
27.
Feld, B. ( 2003). The politics of race and juvenile justice: The ‘‘due process revolution’’ and the conservative reaction. Justice Quarterly, 20, 765-800.
28.
Fields, G. ( 1999, November 18). Study: More women imprisoned for drugs. USA Today, p. A3.
29.
Fields, G. ( 2000a, April 26). Campaign tries to reverse rise in drug abuse by girls: It’s no longer a young man’s problem. USA Today, p. A4.
30.
Fields, G. ( 2000b, June 8). Study: War on drugs is stacked against blacks . USA Today, p. A3.
31.
Fields, G. ( 2000c, March 30). Far-reaching drug busts set DEA records. USA Today, p. A3.
32.
Fields, G. ( 2000d, July 7). Violence of Puerto Rican drug ring made busts a priority. USA Today, p. A3.
33.
Fields, G. ( 2000e, May 5). Mexico arrests alleged No. 3 in violent cocaine cartel: Capture announced as ‘major victory’ in drug-trafficking fight. USA Today, p. A4.
34.
Garcia, G. ( 1999, December 1). Truly horrid search at border: Dead thought to be victims of drug trade. USA Today, p. A3.
35.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
36.
Gray, J.P. ( 2001). Why our drug laws have failed and what we can do about it: A judicial indictment of the war on drugs. Philadelphia , PA: Temple University Press.
37.
Greene, E., & Loftus, E. ( 1984). What’s new in the news? The impact of well-publicized news events on psychological research and courtroom trials. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 211-221.
38.
Greene, E., & Wade, R. ( 1988). Of private talk and public print: General pre-trial publicity and juror decision-making. Applied Social Psychology, 2, 123-135.
39.
Hartley, R.D., Maddan, S., & Spohn, C.C. ( 2007a). Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in Federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. Justice Quarterly, 24, 382-407.
40.
Hartley, R.D., Maddan, S., & Spohn, C.C. ( 2007b). Concerning conceptualization and operationalization: Sentencing data and the focal concerns perspective - A research note. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 4, 58-78.
41.
Hatsukami, D.K., & Fischman, M.W. (1996). Crack cocaine and cocaine hydrochloride: Are the differences myth or reality? Journal of the American Medical Association, 276, 1580-1588.
42.
Huberman, A.M., & Miles, M.B. ( 1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
Inciardi, J.A. ( 1987). Beyond cocaine: Basuco, crack, and other coca products . Contemporary Drug Problems, 14, 461-492.
44.
Inciardi, J.A., Pottieger, A.E., & Surrat, H.L. ( 1996). African Americans and the crack-crime connection. In D. D. Chitwood, J. E. Rivers, & J. A. Inciardi (Eds.), The American pipe dream: Crack cocaine and the inner city. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
45.
Jensen, E.L., Gerber, J., & Mosher, C. ( 2004). Social consequences of the War on Drugs: The legacy of failed policy. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 15, 100-121.
46.
Jesdanun, A. ( 2008, October 27). Newspapers see sharp circulation drop. Associated Press Newswire. Retrieved December 18, 2008, from LexisNexis Academic database.
47.
Jones, C. ( 1999, October 6). N.M. Governor calls for drug legalization . USA Today, p. A4.
48.
Kasindorf, M. ( 2000, March 16). Feud trips LAPD corruption inquiry: Detective told not to share information with prosecutors. USA Today , p. A5.
49.
Kautt, P., & Spohn, C. ( 2002). Crack-ing down on black drug offenders? Testing for interactions among offenders’ race, drug type, and sentencing strategy in federal drug sentences. Justice Quarterly, 19, 633-705.
50.
Kramer, J.H., & Ulmer, J.T. ( 1996). Sentencing disparity and departures from guidelines. Justice Quarterly, 13, 401-425.
51.
Leinwand, D. ( 2000a, September 28). Coast guard cocaine seizure set record: New surveillance and tactics help, but fight still has ‘long way’ to go. USA Today, p. A3.
52.
Leinwand, D. ( 2000b, February 25). LAPD, neighborhood shaken. USA Today, p. A3.
53.
Lockwood, D., Pottieger, A.E., & Inciardi, J.A. (1995). Crack use, crime by crack users, and ethnicity. In D. Hawkins (Ed.), Ethnicity, race, and crime: Perspectives across time and place. New York, NY: SUNY Press.
54.
Mauer, M. ( 1999). Race to incarcerate. New York: New Press.
55.
McCain, T. ( 1992). The interplay of editorial and prosecutorial discretion in the perpetuation of racism in the Criminal Justice System. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 25, 601-643.
56.
Meierhofer, B.S. ( 1992). The general effect of mandatory minimum prison terms: A longitudinal study of federal sentences imposed. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
57.
Merton, R.K. ( 1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.
58.
Miller, J.M., Wright, R.A., & Smith, M.M. ( 2000). Mostly male and American: The reporting of women and crime scholarship in introductory criminology textbooks. The Justice Professional, 13, 233-245.
59.
Mustard, D.B. ( 2001). Racial, ethnic, and gender disparities in sentencing: Evidence from the U.S. federal courts. Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 1-30.
60.
Nardulli, P. ( 1978). The courtroom elite: An organizational perspective on criminal justice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
61.
Nhsda. (2000). National household survey on drug abuse, 2000. Retrieved February 23, 2007, from http://www.oas.samhsa.gov/NHSDA/2kNHSDA/2knhsda.htm
62.
Ogletree, C. ( 2004). Discriminatory impact of mandatory minimum sentences in the United States. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 18, 273-278.
63.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R.Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. ( 1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859-866.
64.
Pettit, P.N. ( 2002). Is criminal justice policy feasible? Buffalo Criminal Law review, 5, 427-450.
65.
Pritchard, D. ( 1986). Homicide and bargained justice: The agenda-setting effect of crime news on prosecutors. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 166-185.
66.
Pritchard, D., Dilts, J., & Berkowitz, D. ( 1987). Prosecutors’ use of external agendas in prosecuting pornography cases. Journalisn Quarterly, 64, 392-398.
67.
Reinarman, C., & Levine, H.G. ( 2004). Crack in the rearview mirror: Deconstructing drug war mythology. Social Justice, 31, 182-199.
68.
Reinarman, C., & Levine, H.G. ( 1997a). Crack in context: America’s latest demon drug . In C. Reinarman & H. G. Levine (Eds.), Crack in America . Berkeley: University of California Press.
69.
Reinarman, C., & Levine, H.G. ( 1997b). The crack attack: Politics and media in the crack scare . In C. Reinarman & H. G. Levine (Eds.), Crack in America . Berkeley: University of California Press.
70.
Sample, L.L. ( 2001). The social construction of the sex offender. Unpublished dissertation, University of Missouri, St. Louis.
71.
Scalia, J. ( 2001). Federal drug offenders, 1999 with trends 1984-1999. United States Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Special Report, Washington, DC.
72.
Schulhofer, S.J., & Nagel, I.H. ( 1997). Plea negotiations under the federal sentencing guidelines: Guideline circumvention and its dynamics in the post-Mistretta period. Northwestern Law Review, 91, 1284-1316.
73.
Shapiro, W. ( 2000a, January 19). Iowa, N.H. white noise drowns out minority issues. USA Today, p. A2.
74.
Shapiro, W. ( 2000b, June 16). Hillary Clinton’s crusade of maybes. USA Today, p. A10.
75.
Shapiro, W. ( 2000c, August 2). Powell goes behind bars for free speech. USA Today, p. A8.
76.
Smith, E.B. ( 2000, September 12). Mexico’s drug trade taking down its citizens: Abuse problems now touching all walks of life. USA Today, p. A22.
77.
Smith, H.W. ( 1975). Strategies of social research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
78.
Spohn, C. ( 2000). Thirty years of sentencing reform: The quest for a racially neutral sentencing process. National Institute of Justice: Criminal Justice2000. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
79.
Spohn, C., & Beichner, D. ( 2000). Is preferential treatment of female offenders a thing of the past? A multi-site study of gender, race, and imprisonment. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 11, 149-184.
80.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2000). The imprisonment penalty paid by young, unemployed black and Hispanic male offenders. Criminology, 38, 281-306.
81.
Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. ( 2001). Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners. Justice Quarterly, 18, 651-685.
82.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2000). Ethnicity and sentencing outcomes in U.S. federal courts: Who is punished more harshly? American Sociological Review , 65, 705-729.
83.
Steffensmeier, D., & Demuth, S. ( 2001). Ethnicity and judges sentencing decisions: Hispanic-black-white comparisons. Criminology, 39, 145-177.
84.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., & Streifel, C. ( 1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology , 31, 411-446.
85.
Steffensmeier, D., & Motivans, M. ( 2000). Older men and older women in the arms of the criminal law: Offending patterns and sentencing outcomes. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 55B, 141-151.
86.
Steffensmeier, D., Ulmer, J., & Kramer, J. ( 1998). The interaction of race, gender, and age in criminal sentencing: The punishment cost of being young, black, and male. Criminology, 36, 763-797.
87.
Stroman, C., & Seltzer, R. ( 1985). Media use and perception of crime. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 340-345.
88.
Surette, R. ( 1990). The media and criminal justice policy: Recent research and social effects. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
89.
Surette, R. ( 1992). Methodological problems in determining media effects on criminal justice: A review and suggestions for the future. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 6, 291-310.
90.
Surette, R. ( 1999). Media echoes: Systemic effects of news coverage. Justice Quarterly, 16, 601-631.
91.
Surette, R. ( 2007). Media, crime and criminal justice: Images, realities and policies (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
92.
Sutel, S. ( 2000, May 1). Major newspapers post circulation gains. Associated Press Newswire. Retrieved December 18, 2008, from LexisNexis Academic database.
93.
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. ( 1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
94.
The Sentencing Project. (2002). Crack cocaine sentencing policy: Unjustified and unreasonable. Washington, DC: Author.
95.
The Sentencing Project. (2008). Federal crack cocaine sentencing. Washington, DC: Author.
96.
Tonry, M. ( 1995). Malign neglect: Race, crime, and punishment in America . New York: Oxford University Press .
97.
United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (1992). Drugs. Crime, and the justice system . Washington, DC: Author.
98.
United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Key facts at a Glance: Incarceration rates, 1980-2001. Washington, DC: Author .
99.
United States Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2006). Prisoners in 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
100.
United States General Accounting Office. ( 1993). Mandatory minimum sentences: Are they being imposed and who is receiving them?Washington, DC: Author.
101.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1991 a). Mandatory minimum penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC: Author.
102.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1991 b). Special report to Congress: Mandatory minimum penalties in the Federal Criminal Justice System. Washington, DC : Author.
103.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1995 ). Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
104.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1997 ). Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
105.
United States Sentencing Commission. (1999 ). Federal sentencing guidelines manual. Washington, DC: Author.
106.
United States Sentencing Commission. (2002 ). Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
107.
United States Sentencing Commission. (2007 ). Cocaine and federal sentencing policy. Washington, DC: Author.
108.
United States Sentencing Commission. (2008 ). Preliminary crack cocaine retroactivity data report. Washington, DC: Author.
109.
Vincent, B.S., & Hofer, P.J. ( 1994). The consequences of mandatory minimum prison terms: A summary of recent findings. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
Wickham, D. ( 1999, November 23). Gore view falls short on cocaine disparity . USA Today, p. A19.
112.
Willing, R. ( 2000, February 29). Supreme Court to address hospital’s role in drug war. USA Today, p. A4.
113.
Wilmot, K., & Spohn, C. ( 2004). Prosecutorial discretion and real offense sentencing: An analysis of relevant conduct under the Federal Sentencing guidelines. Criminal Justice policy Review, 15, 324-343.
114.
Wright, R.A., Miller, J.M., & Britz, M. ( 2001). Who gets the ink? A page-coverage analysis of the most influential scholars in criminology and criminal justice journals. Journal of Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 28.
115.
Zimring, F., Hawkins, G., & Kamin, S. ( 2001). Punishment and democracy: Three strikes and you’re out in California. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
