Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether measures of criminal thought content and criminal thought process are capable of mediating the peer influence effect. Participants were all 1,725 (918 boys and 807 girls) members of the National Youth Survey. The average age of the participants was 13.87 years at initial contact. In this study, attitudes toward deviance served as a measure of criminal thought content, proactive criminal thinking served as a measure of criminal thought process, and the lagged delinquent peers–offending relationship marked the peer influence effect. Path analysis was conducted with structured equation modeling and demonstrated that criminal thought content and criminal thought process, both individually and conjointly, mediated the peer influence effect. There was no evidence that these effects were moderated by gender. A principal implication of these results is that criminal thought content and criminal thought process are both instrumental in mediating the effect of peer deviance on participant delinquency. In addition, criminal thought content and criminal thought process appear to be learned through association with deviant peers while providing nonredundant and largely additive variance to predictions of subsequent offending via their ability to link prior delinquent peer associations to future offending behavior.

Keywords

peer influence effect criminal thought content criminal thought process attitudes toward deviance proactive criminal thinking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akers

R. L.

(1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.

Allison

P. D.

(2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312-2012). Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

Andrews

D. A.

Bonta

(2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender.

Ariza

J. J. M.

Cebulla

Aldridge

Shute

Ross

(2014). Proximal adolescent outcomes of gang membership in England and Wales. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 51, 168–199. doi:10.1177/0022427813406791

Augustyn

M. B.

McGloin

J. M.

(2013). The risk of informal socializing with peers: Considering gender differences across predatory delinquency and substance use. Justice Quarterly, 30, 117–143. doi:10.1080/07418825.2011.597417

Bandura

Barbaranelli

Caprara

G. V.

Pastorelli

(1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364

Banse

Koppehele-Gossel

Kistemaker

J. M.

Werner

V. A.

Schmidt

A. F.

(2013). Pro-criminal attitudes, intervention, and recidivism. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 673–685. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2013.07.024

Baron

R. M.

Kenny

D. A.

(1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173

Berman

A. H.

(2004). The Reasoning and Rehabilitation program: Assessing short- and long-term outcomes among male Swedish prisoners. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 40, 85–103. doi:10.1300/J076v40n01_05

10.

Chesney-Lind

Palko

(2004). The female offender: Girls, women, and crime (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

11.

Cole

D. A.

Maxwell

S. E.

(2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.112.4.558

12.

Costello

B. J.

Vowell

P. R.

(1999). Testing control theory and differential association: A reanalysis of the Richmond Youth Project data. Criminology, 37, 815–842. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00506.x

13.

Elliott

(1976–1980). National Youth Survey (United States): Waves 1–5, 1976–1980. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.

14.

Fagan

A. A.

Van Horn

M. L.

Hawkins

J. D.

Arthur

M. W.

(2007). Gender similarities and differences in the association between risk and protective factors and self-reported serious delinquency. Prevention Science, 8, 115–124. doi:10.1007/s11121-006-0062-1

15.

Gendreau

Grant

B. A.

Leipciger

Collins

(1979). Norms and recidivism rates for the MMPI and selected experimental scales on a Canadian delinquent sample. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 11, 21–31. doi:10.1037/h0081569

16.

Hayes

A. F.

(2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76, 408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360

17.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.

18.

Henneberger

A. K.

Durkee

M. I.

Truong

Atkins

Tolan

(2013). The longitudinal relationship between peer violence and popularity and delinquency in adolescent boys: Examining effects by family functioning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1651–1660. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9859-3

19.

Hochstetler

Copes

DeLisi

(2002). Differential association in group and solo offending. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 559–566. doi:10.1016/S0047-2352(02)00177-0

20.

Hoeve

Dubas

J. S.

Eichelsheim

V. I.

van der Laan

P. H.

Smeenk

Gerris

J. R. M.

(2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9310-8

21.

Kenny

D. A.

(2013). Mediation: Sensitivity analysis [webinar]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html

22.

Kenny

D. A.

Judd

C. M.

(2014). Power anomalies in testing mediation. Psychological Science, 25, 334–339. doi:10.1177/0956797613502676

23.

Kroner

D. G.

Morgan

R. D.

(2014). An overview of strategies for the assessment and treatment of criminal thinking. In Tafrate

R. C.

Mitchell

(Eds.), Forensic CBT: A handbook for clinical practice (pp. 87–103). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.

24.

MacKinnon

D. P.

Kisbu-Sakarya

Gottschall

A. C.

(2013). Developments in mediation analysis. In Little

T. D.

(Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods (Vol. 2, pp. 338–360). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

25.

Matsueda

R. L.

Anderson

(1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269–308. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1998.tb01249.x

26.

Mears

D. P.

Ploeger

Warr

(1998). Explaining the gender gap in delinquency: Peer influence and moral evaluations of behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 35, 251–266. doi:10.1177/0022427898035003001

27.

Menard

Elliott

D. S.

(1994). Delinquent bonding, moral beliefs, and illegal behavior: A three-wave panel model. Justice Quarterly, 11, 173–188. doi:10.1080/07418829400092211

28.

Meter

D. J.

Casper

D. M.

Card

N. A.

(2015). Perceptions of intimacy and friendship reciprocity moderate peer influence on aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 41, 432–442. doi:10.1002/ab.21577

29.

Mitchell

Dodder

R. A.

(1990). Neutralization and delinquency: A comparison by sex and ethnicity. Adolescence, 98, 487–497.

30.

Morgan

R. D.

Fisher

W. H.

Duan

Mandracchia

J. T.

Murray

(2010). Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 324–336. doi:10.1007/s10979-009-9182-z

31.

Muthén

(1998–2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.

32.

Negriff

Trickett

P. K.

(2011). Exposure to peer delinquency as a mediator between self-report pubertal timing and delinquency: A longitudinal study of mediation. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 293–304. doi:10.1017/S0954579410000805

33.

Payne

D. C.

Cornwell

(2007). Reconsidering peer influences on delinquency: Do less proximate contacts matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 23, 127–149. doi:10.1007/s10940-006-9022-y

34.

Peyre

Leplége

Coste

(2011). Missing data methods for dealing with missing items in quality of life questionnaires: A comparison by simulation of personal mean score, full information maximum likelihood, multiple imputation, and hot deck techniques applied to the SF-36 in the French 2003 decennial health survey. Quality of Life Research, 20, 287–300. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9740-3

35.

Pratt

T. C.

Cullen

F. T.

Sellers

C. S.

Winfree

L. T.

Madensen

T. D.

Daigle

L. E.

… Gau

J. M.

(2010). The empirical status of social learning theory: A meta-analysis. Justice Quarterly, 27, 765–802. doi:10.1080/07418820903379610

36.

Preacher

K. J.

Hayes

A. F.

(2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

37.

Rebellon

C. J.

Modecki

K. L.

(2014). Accounting for peer influence: The utility and limits of latent variable approaches. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30, 163–186. doi:10:1007/s10940-013-9199-9

38.

Rucker

D. D.

Preacher

K. J.

Tormala

Z. L.

Petty

R. E.

(2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00355.x

39.

Shadish

W. R.

Cook

T. D.

Campbell

D. T.

(2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Mifflin.

40.

Silverman

J. R.

Caldwell

R. M.

(2005). The influence of parental emotional support and monitoring on self-reported delinquent impulsive behavior and noncompliance among juvenile offenders: An examination of gender differences. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 4, 159–174. doi:10.1080/14999013.2005.10471221

41.

Simourd

D. J.

(1997). The Criminal Sentiments Scale-Modified and Pride in Delinquency Scale: Psychometric properties and construct validity of two measures of criminal attitudes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 52–70. doi:10.1177/0093854897024001004

42.

Sutherland

E. H.

(1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott.

43.

Sykes

G. M.

Matza

(1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670. doi:10.2307/2089195

44.

Thomas

K. J.

McGloin

J. M.

(2013). A dual systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology, 51, 435–474. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12010

45.

Thornberry

T. P.

Lizotte

A. J.

Krohn

M. D.

Farnworth

Jang

S. J.

(1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interaction theory. Criminology, 32, 47–83. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1994.tb01146.x

46.

U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Summary file—Census demographic profile. Washington, DC: Author.

47.

Walters

G. D.

(1990). The criminal lifestyle: Patterns of serious criminal conduct. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

48.

Walters

G. D.

(1995). The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles: Part I. Reliability and preliminary validity. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 307–325. doi:10.1177/0093854895022003008

49.

Walters

G. D.

(2012a). Crime in a psychological context: From career criminals to criminal careers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

50.

Walters

G. D.

(2012b). Criminal thinking and recidivism: Meta-analytic evidence on the predictive and incremental validity of the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17, 272–278. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.02.010

51.

Walters

G. D.

(2013). Delinquency, parental involvement, early adult criminality, and sex: Evidence of moderated mediation. Journal of Adolescence, 36, 777–785. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.011

52.

Walters

G. D.

(2014). Sex as a moderator and perceived peer pressure as a mediator of the externalizing-delinquency relationship: A test of gendered pathways theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 42, 299–305. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.02.003

53.

Walters

G. D.

(2015). Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: A cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1128–1144. doi:10.1177/0093854815582042

54.

Walters

G. D.

(2016). Neighborhood context, youthful offending, and peer selection: Does it take a village to raise a nondelinquent? Criminal Justice Review, 41, 5–20. doi:10.1177/0734016815606783

55.

Walters

G. D.

(in press). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents Justice Quarterly doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1039048

56.

Walters

G. D.

(2016). Predicting recidivism with the Criminal Sentiments Scale: A meta-analysis of a putative measure of criminal thought content. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(9), 1159–1172.

57.

Walters

G. D.

Yurvati

(2015). Testing the construct validity of the PICTS proactive and reactive scores against six putative measures of proactive and reactive criminal thinking. Manuscript submitted for publication.

58.

Warr

Stafford

(1991). The influence of delinquent peers: what they think or what they do? Criminology, 29, 851–866. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1991.tb01090.x

Criminal Thought Content and Criminal Thought Process as Mediators of Peer Influence

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References