What can we learn by applying a meta-analysis to the public administration literature on job satisfaction? More generally, how can public management scholars use this method to capitalize on the decades of research on other topics within our field? This study reports the findings of the first quantitative review of the public administration literature on job satisfaction. We retrieved quantitative data from primary studies published in 42 public administration journals since 1969 and performed a meta-analysis of the relationships between job satisfaction and 43 correlates. The findings include meta-analytically derived effect sizes, measures of the heterogeneity in the effect size underlying all primary studies, and several indicators of publication bias. In presenting the results of our meta-analysis, we address the merits and limitations of this methodology and discuss how public administration scholars could take full advantage of this information to advance knowledge in other areas within the field.
AguinisH.DaltonD. R.BoscoF. A.PierceC. A.DaltonC. M. (2011). Meta-analytic choices and judgment calls: Implications for theory building and testing, obtained effect sizes, and scholarly impact. Journal of Management, 37, 5-38.
2.
AguinisH.PierceC. A.BoscoF. A.DaltonD. R.DaltonC. M. (2011). Debunking myths and urban legends about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 306-331.
3.
*AlaviH. R.AskaripurM. R. (2003). The relationship between self-esteem and job satisfaction of personnel in government organizations. Public Personnel Management, 32, 591-600.
4.
*AlotaibiA. G. (2001). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior: A study of public personnel in Kuwait. Public Personnel Management, 30, 363-376.
5.
*AndersenL. B.KjeldsenA. M. (2013). Public service motivation, user orientation, and job satisfaction: A question of employment sector?International Public Management Journal, 16, 252-274.
6.
BalzerW. K.SmithP. C.KravitzD. A.LovellS. E.PaulK. B.ReillyB. A.ReillyC. E. (1990). User’s manual for the Job Descriptive Index (JDI) and the Job in General (JIG) scales. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.
7.
*BangH. (2011). Leader–member exchange in nonprofit sport organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 22, 85-105.
8.
BanksG. C.KepesS.BanksK. P. (2012). Publication bias: The antagonist of meta-analytic reviews and effective policymaking. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34, 259-277.
9.
BanksG. C.KepesS.McDanielM. A. (2012). Publication bias: A call for improved meta-analytic practice in the organizational sciences. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20, 182-196.
10.
*BlackburnJ. W.BruceW. M. (1989). Rethinking concepts of job satisfaction: The case of Nebraska municipal clerks. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 10(1), 11-28.
11.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
12.
*BorgogniL.Dello RussoS.PetittaL.VecchioneM. (2010). Predicting job satisfaction and job performance in a privatized organization. International Public Management Journal, 13, 275-296.
13.
*BredaA. D. V. (2000). The practical value of strategic direction. Administration in Social Work, 24(3), 1-16.
14.
*BrewerG. A.SeldenS. C. (1998). Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8, 413-440.
15.
*BrownW. A.YoshiokaC. F. (2003). Mission attachment and satisfaction as factors in employee retention. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 5-18.
16.
*CaillierJ. G. (2012). The Impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. Federal Government Agency. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 461-480.
17.
*CaillierJ. G. (2013). Satisfaction with work-life benefits and organizational commitment/job involvement: Is there a connection?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 340-364.
18.
*CaillierJ. G. (2014). Towards a better understanding of public service motivation and mission valence in public agencies. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14719037.2014.895033
19.
*ChihW. H. W.YangF. H.ChangC. K. (2012). The study of the antecedents and outcomes of attitude toward organizational change. Public Personnel Management, 41, 597-617.
20.
*ChoY. J.LeeJ. W. (2011). Perceived trustworthiness of supervisors, employee satisfaction and cooperation. Public Management Review, 13, 941-965.
21.
*ChoY. J.ParkH. (2011). Exploring the relationships among trust, employee satisfaction, and organizational commitment. Public Management Review, 13, 551-573.
22.
*ChoY. J.PerryJ. L. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and employee attitudes role of managerial trustworthiness, goal directedness, and extrinsic reward expectancy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 382-406.
23.
*ChoY. J.SaiN. (2013). Does organizational justice matter in the federal workplace?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 227-251.
24.
*ChoiS. (2009). Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 603-630.
25.
*ChoiS. (2010). Organizational justice and employee work attitudes: The federal case. The American Review of Public Administration, 41, 185-204.
26.
CortinaJ. M. (2003). Apples and oranges and pears, (oh my!): The search for moderators in meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 6, 415-439.
27.
*DaleyD. M. (1986). Humanistic management and organizational success: The effect of job and work environment characteristics on organizational effectiveness, public responsiveness, and job satisfaction. Public Personnel Management, 15, 131-142.
28.
*DaleyD. M. (1992). When bureaucrats get the blues: A replication and extension of the Rusbult and Lowery analysis of federal employee responses to job dissatisfaction. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 2, 233-246.
29.
*DaleyD. M. (1997). Putting the super in supervisor: Determinants of federal employee evaluation of supervisors. Public Personnel Management, 26, 301-311.
30.
*DaleyD. M. (2007). If a tree falls in the forest: The effect of grievances on employee perceptions of performance appraisal, efficacy, and job satisfaction. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 281-296.
31.
*DaleyD. M.VasuM. L. (1998). Fostering organizational trust in North Carolina: The pivotal role of administrators and political leaders. Administration & society, 30, 62-84.
32.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000a). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89-98.
33.
DuvalS.TweedieR. (2000b). Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot–based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics, 56, 455-463.
34.
*EllicksonM. C.LogsdonK. (2002). Determinants of job satisfaction of municipal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 31, 343-358.
35.
FergusonC. J.BrannickM. T. (2012). Publication bias in psychological science: Prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses. Psychological Methods, 17(1), 120-128.
36.
*FreundA. (2005). Commitment and job satisfaction as predictors of turnover intentions among welfare workers. Administration in Social Work, 29(2), 5-21.
37.
*GellisZ. D. (2001). Job stress among academic health center and community hospital social workers. Administration in Social Work, 25(3), 17-33.
38.
**GellisZ. D. (2002). Coping with occupational stress in healthcare: A comparison of social workers and nurses. Administration in Social work, 26(3), 37-52.
39.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ. B. E.CunhaP. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35, 393-419.
40.
*GiauqueD.RitzA.VaroneF.Anderfuhren-BigetS. (2012). Resigned but satisfied: The negative impact of public service motivation and red tape on work satisfaction. Public Administration, 90, 175-193.
41.
GlassG. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
42.
GlassG. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
43.
*GordonV. (2011). Exploring the job satisfaction of municipal clerks. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 190-208.
44.
*Gould-WilliamsJ. S.BottomleyP.RedmanT.SnapeE.BishopD. J.LimpanitgulT.MostafaA. M. S. (2013). Civic duty and employee outcomes: Do high commitment human resource practices and work overload matter?Public Administration, 92, 937-953.
45.
*GrantN. K.GarrisonC. G.McCormickK. (1990). Perceived utilization, job satisfaction and advancement of police women. Public Personnel Management, 19, 147-154.
46.
GroeneveldS.TummersL. G.BronkhorstB.AshikaliT.Van ThielS. (2015). Quantitative methods in public administration: Their use and development through time. International Public Management Journal, 18(1), 61-86.
47.
*GuyM. E.LeeH. J. (2013). How emotional intelligence mediates emotional labor in public service jobs. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. doi:0734371X13514095
48.
*HansenJ. R.HøstV. (2012). Understanding the relationships between decentralized organizational decision structure, job context, and job satisfaction—A survey of Danish public managers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 288-308.
49.
*HassanS. (2013). The importance of role clarification in workgroups: Effects on perceived role clarity, work satisfaction, and turnover rates. Public Administration Review, 73, 716-725.
50.
HecloH. (1969). The councillor’s job. Public Administration, 47, 185-202.
51.
*HoxseyD. (2010). Are happy employees healthy employees? Researching the effects of employee engagement on absenteeism. Canadian Public Administration, 53, 551-571.
52.
*HsiehC. W.JinM. H.GuyM. E. (2011). Consequences of work-related emotions: Analysis of a cross-section of public service workers. The American Review of Public Administration, 42, 39-53.
53.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1996). Cumulative research knowledge and social policy formulation: The critical role of meta-analysis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2(2), 324-347.
54.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2014). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56.
*IhrkeD. M. (2004). Mission change in a federal agency and its link to employee transfer preferences. The American Review of Public Administration, 34, 181-198.
*JaskyteK. (2004). Assessing changes in employees’ perceptions of leadership behavior, job design, and organizational arrangements and their job satisfaction and commitment. Administration in Social Work, 27(4), 25-39.
59.
*JinM. H.GuyM. E. (2009). How emotional labor influences worker pride, job satisfaction, and burnout. Public Performance & Management Review, 33, 88-105.
60.
*JungC. S. (2014). Organizational goal ambiguity and job satisfaction in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, 955-981.
61.
*KayserK.WalkerD.DemaioJ. (2000). Understanding social workers’ sense of competence within the context of organizational change. Administration in Social Work, 24(4), 1-20.
62.
KepesS.BanksG. C.McDanielM.WhetzelD. L. (2012). Publication bias in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods, 15, 624-662.
63.
*KimS. (2002). Organizational support of career development and job satisfaction: A case study of the Nevada Operations Office of the Department of Energy. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 22, 276-294.
64.
*KimS. (2002). Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review, 62, 231-241.
65.
KimS. (2005). Individual-level factors and organizational performance in government organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 245-261.
66.
*KimS. (2012). Does person-organization fit matter in the public-sector? Testing the mediating effect of person-organization fit in the relationship between public service motivation and work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 72, 830-840.
67.
*KimS.WrightB. E. (2007). IT employee work exhaustion: Toward an integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 147-170.
68.
KinickiA. J.McKee-RyanF. M.SchriesheimC. A.CarsonK. P. (2002). Assessing the construct validity of the job descriptive index: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 14-32.
69.
*KoJ.HurS.Smith-WalterA. (2013). Family-friendly work practices and job satisfaction and organizational performance: Moderating effects of managerial support and performance-oriented management. Public Personnel Management, 42, 545-565.
70.
*LeeH.CayerN. J.LanG. Z. (2006). Changing federal government employee attitudes since the civil service reform act of 1978. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 26, 21-51.
71.
*LevyM.PoertnerJ.LiebermanA. (2012). Work attitudes and intention to quit among workers in private child welfare agencies operating under performance-based contracts. Administration in Social Work, 36, 175-188.
72.
*LindorffM. (2011). Job satisfaction and gender in the APS: Who’d want to be a male?Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70, 58-74.
73.
*LiuB. C.TangT. L. P. (2011). Does the love of money moderate the relationship between public service motivation and job satisfaction? The case of Chinese professionals in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 71, 718-727.
74.
*LiuB.TangT. L. P.YangK. (2013). When does public service motivation fuel the job satisfaction fire? The joint moderation of person-organization fit and needs-supplies fit. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.867068
75.
LockeE. A. (1976). The nature and cause of job satisfaction. In DunnetteM. D. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297-1343). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
76.
*Lortie-LussierM.RinfretN. (2005). Determinants of objective and subjective success of men and women. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71, 607-624.
77.
McDanielM. A.RothsteinH. R.WhetzelD. L. (2006). Publication bias: A case study of four test vendors. Personnel Psychology, 59, 927-953.
78.
*MengF.ZhangJ.HuangZ. (2014). Perceived organizational health as a mediator for job expectations: A multidimensional integrated model. Public Personnel Management, 43(3), 355-370.
79.
*MikkelsenA.GrønhaugK. (1999). Measuring organizational learning climate: A cross-national replication and instrument validation study among public sector employees. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 19(4), 31-44.
80.
*MoynihanD. P.PandeyS. K. (2007). Finding workable levers over work motivation: Comparing job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Administration & Society, 39, 803-832.
81.
*ParkS. M. (2010). The effects of personnel reform systems on Georgia state employees’ attitudes: An empirical analysis from a principal–agent theoretical perspective. Public Management Review, 12, 403-437.
82.
*ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2007). Antecedents, mediators, and consequences of affective, normative, and continuance commitment: Empirical tests of commitment effects in federal agencies. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27, 197-226.
83.
*ParkS. M.RaineyH. G. (2008). Leadership and public service motivation in US federal agencies. International Public Management Journal, 11, 109-142.
84.
PerryJ. L. (2012). How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals?Public Administration Review, 72, 479-482.
85.
*PerryR. W.MankinL. D. (2007). Organizational trust, trust in the chief executive and work satisfaction. Public Personnel Management, 36, 165-179.
86.
*RaiG. S. (2012). Organizational commitment among long-term care staff. Administration in Social Work, 36, 53-66.
87.
*RaiG. S. (2013). Job satisfaction among long-term care staff: Bureaucracy isn’t always bad. Administration in Social Work, 37, 90-99.
88.
*RaineyH. G. (1983). Public agencies and private firms: Incentive structures, goals, and individual roles. Administration & Society, 15, 207-242.
89.
RaineyH. G. (2009). Understanding and managing public organizations. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
90.
*RawsonG. E.SmithR. L. (1978). A look at job satisfaction in the public sector through the need-satisfaction theory. The American Review of Public Administration, 12, 155-163.
91.
*ReidM. F.RiemenschneiderC. K.AllenM. W.ArmstrongD. J. (2008). Information technology employees in state government: A study of affective organizational commitment, job involvement, and job satisfaction. The American Review of Public Administration, 38, 41-61.
92.
*RitzA. (2009). Public service motivation and organizational performance in Swiss federal government. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 53-78.
RousseauD. M.ManningJ.DenyerD. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the full weight of scientific knowledge through synthesis. The Academy of Management Annals, 2, 475-515.
95.
*RubinE. V. (2009). The role of procedural justice in public personnel management: Empirical results from the department of defense. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 125-143.
96.
*RyuG. (2014). The cross-domain effects of work and family role stressors on public employees in South Korea. Review of Public Personnel Administration. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0734371X14540179
97.
SchulzeR. (2007). Current methods for meta-analysis: Approaches, issues, and developments. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(2), 90-103.
98.
*SchweitzerD.ChianelloT.KothariB. (2013). Compensation in social work: Critical for satisfaction and a sustainable profession. Administration in Social Work, 37, 147-157.
99.
SharpeD. (1997). Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: Why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clinical Psychology Review, 17, 881-901.
100.
*ShimD. C.RohrbaughJ. (2013). An explanation of differences between government offices in employees’ organizational citizenship behaviour. Public Management Review, 16, 807-829. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.757352
101.
*ShiromA.ShavitS. (1984). Job and union work satisfaction of part-time union officers. Administration & Society, 16, 83-96.
102.
SmithP. C.KendallL. M.HulinC. L. (1969). The measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
103.
*StazykE. C. (2012). Crowding out public service motivation? Comparing theoretical expectations with empirical findings on the influence of performance-related pay. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33, 252-274.
104.
*TangT. L. P.IbrahimA. H. S. (1998). Antecedents of organizational citizenship behavior revisited: Public personnel in the United States and in the Middle East. Public Personnel Management, 27, 529-550.
105.
*TaylorJ. (2007). The impact of public service motives on work outcomes in Australia: A comparative multi-dimensional analysis. Public Administration, 85, 931-959.
106.
*TaylorJ. (2008). Organizational influences, public service motivation and work outcomes: An Australian study. International Public Management Journal, 11, 67-88.
107.
*TaylorJ. (2013). Public service motivation, relational job design, and job satisfaction in local government. Public Administration, 92, 902-918. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02108.x
108.
*TaylorJ.WestoverJ. H. (2011). Job satisfaction in the public service: The effects of public service motivation, workplace attributes and work relations. Public Management Review, 13, 731-751.
109.
*TingY. (1996). Analysis of job satisfaction of the federal white-collar work force: Findings from the survey of federal employees. The American Review of Public Administration, 26, 439-456.
110.
*TingY. (1997). Determinants of job satisfaction of federal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 26, 313-334.
111.
*UdechukwuI.HarringtonW.ManyakT.SegalS.GrahamS. (2007). The Georgia department of corrections: An exploratory reflection on correctional officer turnover and its correlates. Public Personnel Management, 36, 247-268.
112.
*VandenabeeleW. (2009). The mediating effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on self-reported performance: More robust evidence of the PSM—Performance relationship. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75, 11-34.
113.
*VermeerenB.KuipersB.SteijnB. (2011). Two faces of the satisfaction mirror: A study of work environment, job satisfaction, and customer satisfaction in Dutch municipalities. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 31, 171-189.
114.
*VermeerenB.KuipersB.SteijnB. (2014). Does leadership style make a difference? Linking HRM, job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 34, 174-195.
115.
*Vigoda-GadotE.Ben-ZionE. (2004). Bright shining stars: The mediating effect of organizational image on the relationship between work variables and army officers’ intentions to leave the service for a job in high-tech industry. Public Personnel Management, 33, 201-223.
116.
*Vigoda-GadotE.CohenA. (2003). Work congruence and excellence in human resource management: Empirical evidence from the Israeli nonprofit sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 23, 192-216.
117.
*Vigoda-GadotE.MeiriS. (2008). New public management values and person-organization fit: A socio-psychological approach and empirical examination among public sector personnel. Public Administration, 86, 111-131.
118.
*Vinokur-KaplanD.JayaratneS.ChessW. A. (1994). Job satisfaction and retention of social workers in public agencies, non-profit agencies, and private practice: The impact of workplace conditions and motivators. Administration in Social Work, 18(3), 93-121.
119.
*WangY. D.YangC.WangK. Y. (2012). Comparing public and private employees’ job satisfaction and turnover. Public Personnel Management, 41, 557-573.
120.
WanousJ. P.ReichersA. E.HudyM. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 247-252.
121.
WanousJ. P.SullivanS. E.MalinakJ. (1989). The role of judgment calls in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 259-264.
122.
*WestJ. P.BermanE. M. (2009). Job satisfaction of public managers in special districts. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 327-353.
123.
*WilsonP. A. (1994). Power, politics, and other reasons why senior executives leave the federal government. Public Administration Review, 54, 12-19.
124.
*WrightB. E.DavisB. S. (2003). Job satisfaction in the public sector: The role of the work environment. The American Review of Public Administration, 33, 70-90.
125.
*WrightB. E.KimS. (2004). Participation’s influence on job satisfaction: The importance of job characteristics. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 24, 18-40.
126.
*WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2008). Public service motivation and the assumption of person—Organization fit testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Administration & Society, 40, 502-521.
127.
*WrightB. E.PandeyS. K. (2011). Public organizations and mission valence: When does mission matter?Administration & Society, 43, 22-44.
128.
*YangF. H.WuM.ChangC. C.ChienY. (2011). Elucidating the relationships among transformational leadership, job satisfaction, commitment foci and commitment bases in the public sector. Public Personnel Management, 40, 265-278.
129.
*YangX.WangW. (2013). Exploring the determinants of job satisfaction of civil servants in Beijing, China. Public Personnel Management, 42, 566-587.
130.
*YeoM.AnanthramS.TeoS. T.PearsonC. A. (2013). Leader–member exchange and relational quality in a Singapore public sector organization. Public Management Review. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.806573
131.
*YoungB. S.WorchelS.WoehrD. J. (1998). Organizational commitment among public service employees. Public Personnel Management, 27, 339-348.
