Union advocates and critics believe that unionization influences the performance of public organizations by altering organizational climates and street-level bureaucrats’ experiences and perceptions. However, few empirical works examine this expectation. This article contributes by exploring how variation in unionization is associated with street-level bureaucrats’ perceptions of red tape, discretion, leadership, and accountability. Using nationally representative teacher surveys from the United States, it examines how unionization was associated with teachers’ perceptions over a 9-year period. Although there was some evidence that unionization had a negative association with accountability, the article shows that unionization was not a strong, consistent predictor of street-level bureaucrats’ perceived experiences.
BardachE. (1977). The implementation game: What happens when a bill becomes law. The MIT Press.
4.
BergsteinerH.AveryG. (2009). A generic multiple constituency matrix: Accountability in private prisons. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(3), 631–660.
5.
BozemanB. (1993). A theory of government “red tape.”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 3(3), 273–303.
6.
BozemanB. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Prentice Hall.
7.
BozemanB. (2004). All organizations are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. Beard Books.
8.
BrehmJ.GatesS. (1997). Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. University of Michigan Press.
BrodkinE. (2012). Reflections on street-level bureaucracy: Past, present, and future. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 940–949.
11.
ChandlerT.FeuilleP. (1991). Municipal unions and privatization. Public Administration Review, 51(1), 15–22.
12.
ChandlerT.GelyR. (1995). Protective service unions, political activities, and bargaining outcomes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(3), 295–318.
13.
CohenJ.McCabeL.MichelliN.PickeralT. (2009). School climate: Research, policy, practice, and teacher education. The Teachers College Record, 111(1), 180–213.
14.
CollinsJ. (2012). Theorizing Wisconsin’s 2011 protests: Community-based unionism confronts accumulation by dispossession. American Ethnologist, 39(1), 6–20.
15.
DavisR. (2011). Blue-collar public servants: How union membership influences public service motivation. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(6), 705–723.
16.
DavisR. (2013a). Union commitment and stakeholder red tape: How union values shape perceptions of organizational rules. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 33(4), 365–383.
17.
DavisR. (2013b). Unionization and work attitudes: How union commitment influences public sector job satisfaction. Public Administration Review, 73(1), 74–84.
18.
DeHart-DavisL. (2007). The unbureaucratic personality. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 892–903.
19.
DenisonD. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619–654.
20.
DonahueJ. (2008). The warping of government work. Harvard University Press.
21.
EbertsR.StoneJ. (1984). Unions and public schools: The effect of collective bargaining on American education. Lexington Books.
22.
FernandezS. (2005). Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(2), 197–217.
23.
FernandezS.MoldogazievT. (2013). Using employee empowerment to encourage innovative behavior in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 155–187.
24.
FlavinP.HartneyM. (2015). When government subsidizes its own: Collective bargaining laws as agents of political mobilization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(4), 896–911.
25.
FogedS.AaskovenL. (2017). Public sector unions and privatization: Evidence from the eldercare sector in Danish municipalities. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 27(1), 135–149.
26.
FordingR.SossJ.SchramS. (2007). Devolution, discretion, and the effect of local political values on TANF sanctioning. Social Service Review, 81(2), 285–316.
27.
FoxC. (2012). Three worlds of relief: Race, immigration, and the American welfare state from the progressive era to the new deal. Princeton University Press.
GarnG.CobbC. (2001). A framework for understanding charter school accountability. Education and Urban Society, 33(2), 113–128.
31.
GoldsteinD. (2014). The teacher wars: A history of America’s most embattled profession. Knopf.
32.
HanushekE.KainJ.RivkinS. (2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326–354.
33.
HarritsG. (2019). Stereotypes in context: How and when do street-level bureaucrats use class stereotypes?Public Administration Review, 79(1), 93–103.
34.
HillH. (2003). Understanding implementation: Street-level bureaucrats’ resources for reform. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(3), 265–282.
35.
HillmanA.WithersM.CollinsB. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404–1427.
36.
HoxbyC. (1996). How teachers’ unions affect education production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 671–718.
37.
HoyW. (1990). Organizational climate and culture: A conceptual analysis of the school workplace. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 1(2), 149–168.
38.
HugréeC.PenissatE.SpireA. (2015). Differences between public and private sectors employees following the managerial turn in European States. Revue Française de Sociologie, 56(1), 47–73.
39.
HupeP.HillM. (2007). Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Administration, 85(2), 279–299.
40.
JohnsonS. (1984). Teacher unions in schools. Temple University Press.
41.
JohnsonS.BirkelandS. (2003). The schools that teachers choose. Educational Leadership, 60(8), 20–24.
42.
JungC. (2010). Predicting organizational actual turnover rates in the US federal government. International Public Management Journal, 13(3), 297–317.
43.
KahlenbergR.PotterH. (2014). A smarter charter: Finding what works for charter schools and public education. Teachers College Press.
44.
KaufmannW.BorryE.DeHart-DavisL. (2018). More than pathological formalization: Understanding organizational structure and red tape. Public Administration Review, 79, 236–245.
45.
KearneyR. (1992). Labor relations in the public sector (2nd ed.). Marcel Dekker.
46.
KearneyR. (2010). Public sector labor—Management relations: Change or Status Quo?Review of Public Personnel Administration, 30(1), 89–111.
47.
KeiserL. (2010). Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ decision making: Determining eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Administration Review, 70(2), 247–257.
48.
KeiserL.WilkinsV.MeierK.HollandC. (2002). Lipstick and logarithms: Gender, institutional context, and representative bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 96(3), 553–564.
49.
KelleyR.ThorntonB.DaughertyR. (2005). Relationships between measures of leadership and school climate. Education, 126(1), 17–23.
50.
KelloughJ.SeldenS. (2003). The reinvention of public personnel administration: An analysis of the diffusion of personnel management reforms in the states. Public Administration Review, 63(2), 165–176.
LiebermanM. (1997). The teacher unions: How the NEA and AFT sabotage reform and hold students, parents, teachers, and taxpayers hostage to bureaucracy. Free Press.
53.
LipskyM. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
54.
LortieD. (1977). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
55.
LovenheimM. (2009). The effect of teachers’ unions on education production: Evidence from union election certifications in three Midwestern states. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(4), 525–587.
56.
MalatestaD.SmithC. (2014). Lessons from resource dependence theory for contemporary public and nonprofit management. Public Administration Review, 74(1), 14–25.
57.
MarchJ.OlsenJ. (2006). The logic of appropriateness In MoranM.ReinM.GoodinR. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 689–708). Oxford University Press.
58.
Maynard-MoodyS.MushenoM. (2003). Cops, teachers, counselors: Stories from the front lines of public service. University of Michigan Press.
59.
MeierK.BohteJ. (2007). Politics and the bureaucracy: Policymaking in the fourth branch of government. Thomson/Wadsworth.
60.
MoeT. (2009). Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 156–174.
61.
MoeT. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America’s public schools. Brookings Institution Press.
62.
MooreW. (1978). An analysis of teacher union growth. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 17(2), 204–215.
63.
Nicholson-CrottyS.GrissomJ. A.Nicholson-CrottyJ. (2012). Governance and the impact of public employee unions on organizational performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 35(3), 422–448.
64.
NisarM. A.MaroulisS. (2017). Foundations of relating: Theory and evidence on the formation of street-level bureaucrats’ workplace networks. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 829–839.
65.
OberfieldZ. (2014). Accounting for time: Comparing temporal and atemporal analyses of the business case for diversity management. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 777–789.
66.
OberfieldZ. (2019). Change and stability in public workforce development: A ten-year study of new officers in an urban police department. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1571276
67.
OgletreeC. (1995). An essay on the new public defender for the 21st century. Law & Contemporary Problems, 58(1), 81–93.
68.
OstroffC.KinickiA.TamkinsM. (2003). Organizational culture and climate In WeinerI. (Ed.), Handbook of psychology (pp. 565–593). Wiley.
69.
PandeyS.ScottP. (2002). Red tape: A review and assessment of concepts and measures. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(4), 553–580.
70.
PayneC. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Harvard Education Press.
71.
PfefferJ.SalancikG. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Harper.
72.
ProttasJ. (1979). People-processing: The street-level bureaucrat in public service bureaucracies. Lexington Books.
73.
RenzulliL.ParrottH.BeattieI. (2011). Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 23–48.
74.
RiccucciN. (2011). Public sector labor relations scholarship: Is there a “there,” there?”Public Administration Review, 71(2), 203–209.
75.
RosenfeldJ. (2014). What unions no longer do. Harvard University Press.
76.
SaltzmanG. (1985). Bargaining laws as a cause and consequence of the growth of teacher unionism. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 38(3), 335–351.
StrunkK. (2011). Are teachers’ unions really to blame? Collective bargaining agreements and their relationships with district resource allocation and student performance in California. Education Finance and Policy, 6(3), 354–398.
80.
ThapaA.CohenJ.GuffeyS.Higgins-D’AlessandroA. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385.
TrottierT.Van WartM.WangX. (2008). Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 319–333.
83.
TummersL.BekkersV. (2014). Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Management Review, 16(4), 527–547.
WaddingtonJ. (2015). Trade union membership retention in Europe: The challenge of difficult times. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 21(3), 205–221.
86.
WilkinsV.WilliamsB. (2008). Black or blue: Racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, 68(4), 654–664.
87.
WilsonJ. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books.
88.
WinklerA.ScullJ.ZeehandelaarD. (2012). How strong are US teacher unions? A state-by-state comparison. Fordham Institute.
89.
WohlstetterP.SmithJ.FarrellC. (2013). Choices and challenges: Charter school performance in perspective. Harvard Education Press.
90.
WordenR. (1989). Situational and attitudinal explanations of police behavior: A theoretical reappraisal and empirical assessment. Law & Society Review, 23(4), 667–711.
91.
YinR. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
