This study investigates leadership ambition and focuses this with a simple, yet necessary perspective, the focus of race/ethnicity and gender. Many public organizations may not consider how gendered and racialized aspects of organizations can influence leadership ambition for diverse individuals. We ask: (a) How is gender and race/ethnicity related to leadership ambition? and (b) Are social networks related to leadership ambition based on gender and racial/ethnic differences? Using a 2011 national survey of STEM faculty in U.S. research-based universities, we find significant leadership ambition differences for people of color and that social networks are beneficial for women’s leadership ambition.
AckerJ. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158.
2.
AckerJ. (1992). From sex roles to gendered institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569.
3.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
4.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
5.
AmanatullahE. T.MorrisM. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256.
6.
BaezB. (2000). Race-related service and faculty of color: Conceptualizing critical agency in academe. Higher Education, 39(3), 363–391.
BanchefskyS.WestfallJ.ParkB.JuddC. M. (2016). But you don’t look like a scientist!: Women scientists with feminine appearance are deemed less likely to be scientists. Sex Roles, 75(3), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0586-1
9.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986(23–28), 2.
10.
BanduraA.BarbaranelliC.CapraraG. V.PastorelliC. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206.
11.
BarbezatD. A. (2006). Gender differences in research patterns among PhD economists. The Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.3.359-375
12.
BellasM. L.ToutkoushianR. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: Gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education, 22(4), 367–390.
13.
BenbowR. J.LeeC. (2019). Teaching-focused social networks among college faculty: Exploring conditions for the development of social capital. Higher Education, 78(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0331-5
14.
BiggsJ.HawleyP. H.BiernatM. (2018). The academic conference as a chilly climate for women: Effects of gender representation on experiences of sexism, coping responses, and career intentions. Sex Roles, 78(5), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9
15.
BirdS. R. (2011). Unsettling universities’ incongruous, gendered bureaucratic structures: A case-study approach. Gender, Work & Organization, 18(2), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00510.x
16.
BlauP. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26–54.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. (Ed.), The sociology of economic life (pp. 241–258). Routledge.
19.
BowlesH. R.ThomasonB.BearJ. B. (2019). Reconceptualizing what and how women negotiate for career advancement. Academy of Management Journal, 62(6), 1645–1671.
20.
BrittonD. M. (2017). Beyond the chilly climate: The salience of gender in women’s academic careers. Gender & Society, 31(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243216681494
21.
BurkeR. J. (2007). Women and minorities in STEM: A primer. In BurkeR. J.MattisM. C. (Eds.), Women and minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers. (pp. 3–27). Edward Elgar Publishing.
22.
BystydzienskiJ. M.BirdS. R. (2006). Removing barriers: Women in academic science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Indiana University Press.
23.
CamarenaL. (2020). Gendered expectations: How informal networks shape psychosocial outcomes for STEM faculty in gendered institutions. Arizona State University.
24.
CamarenaL.FeeneyM. K.LecyJ. (2021). Nonprofit entrepreneurship: Gender differences in strategy and practice. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 50(6), 1170–1192. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764021999436
25.
CameronA. C.MillerD. L. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to cluster-robust inference. Journal of Human Resources, 50(2), 317–372. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.50.2.317
26.
CarriganC.QuinnK.RiskinE. A. (2011). The gendered division of labor among STEM faculty and the effects of critical mass. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(3), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021831
27.
CarrollK. (2017). Ambition is priceless: Socialization, ambition, and representative bureaucracy. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016671602
28.
CoffmanK.CollisM.KulkarniL. (2019). Stereotypes and belief updating (Working paper 19-068).
29.
ColemanJ. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.
30.
CorrellS. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730.
31.
DessG. G.ShawJ. D. (2001). Voluntary turnover, social capital, and organizational performance. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 446–456. https://doi.org/10.2307/259187
32.
DomingoC. R.GerberN. C.HarrisD.MamoL.PasionS. G.RebanalR. D. (2022). More service or more advancement: Institutional barriers to academic success for women and women of color faculty at a large public comprehensive minority-serving state university. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 15(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1037/dhe0000292
EatonA. A.SaundersJ. F.JacobsonR. K.WestK. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
35.
FanikoK.EllemersN.DerksB. (2022). Lack of ambition or lack of support? Diverging career experiences of men and women explain the persistence of gender bias. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 52(9), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12883
36.
FeeneyM. K.BernalM. (2010). Women in STEM networks: Who seeks advice and support from women scientists?Scientometrics, 85(3), 767–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0256-y
37.
FeeneyM. K.CamarenaL. (2019). Gender, race, and diversity values among local government leaders. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19865009
38.
FeeneyM. K.LangerJ. (2016). Getting ahead in the public sector: Perceptions of managers in U.S. municipalities. American Review of Public Administration, 46(6), 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015570037
39.
ForretM. L.DoughertyT. W. (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: Differences for men and women?Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(3), 419–437. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.253
40.
FunkK. D. (2015). Gendered governing? Women’s leadership styles and participatory institutions in Brazil. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 564–578.
41.
GaughanM.MelkersJ.WelchE. (2018). Differential social network effects on scholarly productivity: An intersectional analysis. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(3), 570–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243917735900
42.
GranovetterM. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.
43.
GriffithE.DasguptaN. (2018). How the demographic composition of academic science and engineering departments influences workplace culture, faculty experience, and retention risk. Social Sciences, 7(5), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci7050071
44.
GuyM.NewmanM. (2004). Women’s jobs, men’s jobs: Sex segregation and emotional labor. Public Administration Review, 64(3), 289–298.
45.
HackettG.BetzN. E.CasasJ. M.Rocha-SinghI. A. (1992). Gender, ethnicity, and social cognitive factors predicting the academic achievement of students in engineering. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 39, 527–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.39.4.527
46.
HamidullahM. F.WilkinsV. M.MeierK. J. (2009). Looking for their Dick Vermeil: How prior performance influences the selection decision. Public Organization Review, 9(1), 1–14.
47.
HartJ. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 605–634.
48.
HigginsM. C.KramK. E. (2001). Reconceptualizing mentoring at work: A developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378023
49.
HofstedeG. (1980). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad?Organizational Dynamics, 9(1), 42–63.
50.
HoggM. A.van KnippenbergD. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 1–52.
51.
IbarraH. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393451
52.
IbarraH. (1993a). Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/256589
53.
IbarraH. (1993b). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. The Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/258823
54.
IoanideP. (2015). The emotional politics of racism: How feelings trump facts in an era of colorblindness. Stanford University Press.
55.
JamesE. H. (2000). Race-related differences in promotions and support: Underlying effects of human and social capital. Organization Science, 11(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.5.493.15202
56.
JoecksJ.PullK.Backes-GellnerU. (2014). Childbearing and (female) research productivity: A personnel economics perspective on the leaky pipeline. Journal of Business Economics, 84(4), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-013-0676-2
57.
JostJ. T.BanajiM. R.NosekB. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6), 881–919.
58.
JungH. (2022). How included are you in your workplace? The effects of different social structures on perceived inclusion. Arizona State University.
59.
JungH.WelchE. W. (2022). The impact of demographic composition of social networks on perceived inclusion in the workplace. Public Administration Review, 82(3), 522–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13470
60.
KachchafR.KoL.HodariA.OngM. (2015). Career-life balance for women of color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039068
61.
KanterR. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life. In RiekerP.P.CarmenE. (Eds.), The gender gap in psychotherapy (pp. 53–78). Springer.
62.
KhattabJ.Van KnippenbergD.PieterseA. N.HernandezM. (2020). A network utilization perspective on the leadership advancement of minorities. Academy of Management Review, 45(1), 109–129.
63.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.
64.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (2002). Social cognitive career theory. In BrownD. (Ed.), Career choice and development (pp. 255–311).
65.
LeslieS.-J.CimpianA.MeyerM.FreelandE. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347(6219), 6219. https://doi.org/10.1081/E-EWS
66.
LimY.ParkH.TesslerH.ChoiM.JungG.KaoG. (2020). Men and women’s different dreams on the future of the gendered division of paid work and household work after COVID-19 in South Korea. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 69, 100544.
LutterM.SchröderM. (2020). Is there a motherhood penalty in academia? The gendered effect of children on academic publications in German sociology. European Sociological Review, 36(3), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz063
69.
MarantoR.TeodoroM. P.CarrollK.ChengA. (2019). Gendered ambition: Men’s and women’s career advancement in public administration. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 469–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074018804564
70.
MarsdenP. V. (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435–453.
71.
MartinJ. (1994). The organization of exclusion: Institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization, 1(2), 401–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/135050849412011
72.
McDonaldS. (2011). What’s in the “old boys” network? Accessing social capital in gendered and racialized networks. Social Networks, 33, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.10.002
73.
McLaughlinM. W.TalbertJ. E. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. University of Chicago Press.
74.
McPhersonJ. M.Smith-LovinL. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American Sociological Review, 370–379.
75.
MerluzziJ.BurtR. S. (2013). How many names are enough? Identifying network effects with the least set of listed contacts. Social Networks, 35(3), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2013.03.004
76.
MinerK. N.JanuaryS. C.DrayK. K.Carter-SowellA. R. (2019). Is it always this cold? Chilly interpersonal climates as a barrier to the well-being of early-career women faculty in STEM. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 38(2), 226–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-07-2018-0127
77.
MisraJ.KuvaevaA.O’mearaK.CulpepperD. K.JaegerA. (2021). Gendered and racialized perceptions of faculty workloads. Gender & Society, 35(3), 358–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211001387
MollicaK. A. (2003). The influence of diversity context on white men’s and racial minorities’ reactions to disproportionate group harm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 143(4), 415–431.
80.
MorganA. C.WayS. F.HoeferM. J. D.LarremoreD. B.GalesicM.ClausetA. (2021). The unequal impact of parenthood in academia. Science Advances, 7(9), eabd1996. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd1996
81.
National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2021). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2021 (Special Report NSF 21-321). National Science Foundation. https://ncses.nsf.gov/wmpd
82.
NetemeyerR. G.BolesJ. S.McMurrianR. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.4.400
83.
O’MearaK.KuvaevaA.NyuntG.WaugamanC.JacksonR. (2017). Asked more often: Gender differences in faculty workload in research universities and the work interactions that shape them. American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1154–1186.
84.
ObenauerW. G.LangerN. (2019). Inclusion is not a slam dunk: A study of differential leadership outcomes in the absence of a glass cliff. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(6), 101334.
85.
OspinaS.SuC. (2009). Weaving color lines: Race, ethnicity, and the work of leadership in social change organizations. Leadership, 5(2), 131–170.
86.
PadillaR. V.ChávezR. C. (1995). Leaning Ivory tower, The: Latino professors in American Universities. SUNY Press.
87.
PattonW.BartrumD. A.CreedP. A. (2004). Gender differences for optimism, self-esteem, expectations and goals in predicting career planning and exploration in adolescents. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 4(2), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-005-1745-z
88.
PerroneK. M.SedlacekW. E.AlexanderC. M. (2001). Gender and ethnic differences in career goal attainment. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2001.tb00981.x
89.
RayV. (2019). A theory of racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.
90.
RiccucciN. (2021). Managing diversity in public sector workforces (2nd ed.). Routledge.
91.
Riegle-CrumbC.KingB. (2010). Questioning a white male advantage in STEM: Examining disparities in college major by gender and race/ethnicity. Educational Researcher, 39(9), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X10391657
92.
SabharwalM. (2015). From glass ceiling to glass cliff: Women in senior executive service. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 399–426. https://doi.org/10.2307/24484973
93.
SeibertS. E.KraimerM. L.LidenR. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219–237.
94.
SettlesI. H.JonesM. K.BuchananN. T.BrasselS. T. (2022). Epistemic exclusion of women faculty and faculty of color: Understanding Scholar(ly) devaluation as a predictor of turnover intentions. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(1), 31–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2021.1914494
95.
SmithA. E.HassanS.HatmakerD. M.DeHart-DavisL.HumphreyN. (2021). Gender, race, and experiences of workplace incivility in public organizations. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(4), 674–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X20927760
96.
TeodoroM. P. (2011). Bureaucratic ambition: Careers, motives, and the innovative administrator. JHU Press.
97.
TierneyW. G.BensimonE. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Suny Press.
98.
TurnerC. S. V.GonzálezJ. C.WongK. (2011). Faculty women of color: The critical nexus of race and gender. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 4(4), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024630
99.
Vacha-HaaseT.DavenportD. S.KerewskyS. D. (2004). Problematic students: Gatekeeping practices of academic professional psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.35.2.115
100.
ValverdeL. A. (2003). Leaders of color in higher education: Unrecognized triumphs in harsh institutions. Rowman Altamira.
101.
WebsterM.FoschiM. (1988). Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford University Press.
102.
WelchE. W.JhaY. (2016). Network and perceptual determinants of satisfaction among science and engineering faculty in US research universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 290–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9393-z
103.
WellmanB. (1992). Which types of ties and networks provide what kinds of social support. Advances in Group Processes, 9, 207–235.
104.
WoehlerM. L.Cullen-LesterK. L.PorterC. M.FrearK. A. (2021). Whether, how, and why networks influence men’s and women’s career success: Review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 47(1), 207–236.
105.
XuY. J. (2008). Gender disparity in STEM disciplines: A study of faculty attrition and turnover intentions. Research in Higher Education, 49(7), 607–624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-008-9097-4
106.
XuY. J.MartinC. L. (2011). Gender differences in STEM disciplines: From the aspects of informal professional networking and faculty career development. Gender Issues, 28(3), 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-011-9104-5
107.
YangK.PandeyS. K. (2009). How do perceived political environment and administrative reform affect employee commitment?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(2), 335–360.
