The study examines the integration of public service ethics in Indonesia by evaluating the service dimensions of equality, equity, fairness, fidelity, and responsibility. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, then triangulated for reliability. Findings reveal that the service prioritizes non-discriminatory practices, ensuring equal rights and access to services for all citizens, irrespective of their social or economic background. Service innovations underscore a commitment to equity and responsiveness. The implementation of strict procedures and routine employee briefings reflect the fidelity dimension, fostering accountability and ethical conduct. Challenges, including technical issues with digital systems, highlight the need for technological optimization. The study concludes that adherence to public service ethics builds public trust and recommends further improvements in digital literacy, data protection, rural outreach, and community engagement to enhance service delivery.
AfiyahS. (2024). The impact of e-government services, citizen participation, and transparency on public trust in government. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(6): 1246–1261. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i6.200
2.
AlfansyurA.Mariyani. (2020). Seni Mengelola Data: Penerapan Triangulasi Teknik, Sumber Dan Waktu Pada Penelitian Pendidikan Sosial [The Art of Managing Data: Application of Technique, Source, and Time Triangulation in Social Education Research]. Historis: Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(2), 146–150. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.vXiY.3432
3.
ArsyandyH. A.JannahR. N.NursantoG. A. (2022). Pelayanan Eazy Passport Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Pada Kantor Imigrasi Kelas I TPI Bandar Lampung [Eazy Passport Service in Realizing Good Governance at the Class I Immigration Office TPI Bandar Lampung]. Politeknik Imigrasi, 2, 37–58.
4.
BriandoB.BawonoS. K.MirwantoT. (2019). Dimension of whistleblowing system: Urgensity of legislation strengthening. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 8(3), 371.
5.
Budiman FarhanuddinA. F.SetiaA. A. P.JauzaD. (2022). The application of public service ethics in realizing good governance [Penerapan etika pelayanan publik dalam mewujudkan good governance]. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 19(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v19i1.65
6.
BusettoL.WickW.GumbingerC. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(14), 14–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
7.
Class I Immigration Office of TPI Semarang. (2024). Performance accountability report (LKjIP) of the Class I Immigration Office of TPI Semarang, 2024. Class I Immigration Office of TPI Semarang.
8.
CorbyS. (2011). Equality in the Public Sector: The Sky Darkens. In CorbyS.SymonG. (Eds.), Working for the State (pp .108–111). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230347984_6
9.
FauzianN. R. (2021). Model Pengembangan Inovasi Pelayanan Perizinan Simpatik Jabar (Sistem Informasi Pelayanan Untuk Publik Jawa Barat) [Innovation Model of Licensing Service SIMPATIK JABAR (Licensing Service Information System for the People of West Java)]. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi, 18(1), 28–43.
10.
Google Reviews. (2024, November). User reviews of the Class I Immigration Office of TPI Semarang. Google. https://www.google.com/maps
11.
HalisaN.Adys RiskasariA. K. (2022). Etika Pelayanan Publik di Kantor Kecamatan Tanete Riaja Kabupaten Barru [Ethics of Public Service at the Tanete Riaja Subdistrict Office, Barru Regency]. Kajian Ilmiah Mahasiswa Administrasi Publik (KIMAP), 3(5), 1315–1327.
12.
HaryokoS.BahartiarB.ArwadiF. (2020). Analisa Data Penelitian Kualitatif: Konsep, Teknik, Prosedur Analisis [Qualitative Research Data Analysis: Concepts, Techniques, and Analysis Procedures]. Cetakan Pertama, Badan Penerbit UNM.
13.
JopangJ.AryatamaS.MuazzinahM.QamalQ.AnsarA. (2024). Exploring the relationship between e-government, transparency, and citizen trust in government services. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(6). https://global-us.mellbaou.com/index.php/global/article/view/206
14.
MaranjayaA. K. (2022). Good Governance sebagai Tolak Ukur untuk Mengukur Kinerja Pemerintahan [Good Governance as a Benchmark for Measuring Government Performance]. Jurnal Sosial Teknologi, 2(11), 929–941.
15.
MeyerS. J.JohnsonR. G.IIIMcCandlessS. (2022). Meet the new Es: Empathy, engagement, equity, and ethics in public administration. Public Integrity, 24(4–5), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2022.2074764
16.
MuazirS.NurhamsyahM.AlhamdaniM. R. & Rudiyono. (2022). Pola Sebaran dan Keterpusatan Fasilitas Pendidikan sebagai Pelayanan Publik di Kota Pontianak [Distribution Patterns and Centralization of Educational Facilities as Public Services in Pontianak City]. Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning, 6(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.29244/jp2wd.2022.6.3.233-248
17.
NgorangP. (Ed.). (2020). Etika Pelayanan Publik: Sebuah Pengantar [Public Service Ethics: An Introduction] (1st ed.). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
PermatasariI. A. (2020). Kajian Penerapan Prinsip Good Governance Pemerintah Kabupaten Lebak [Study on the Implementation of Good Governance Principles in the Government of Lebak Regency]. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah, 4(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.37950/jkpd.v4i1.99
20.
PratiwiW.Lamijan SusilowatiT.KarimA. (2021). Kepuasan Masyarakat terhadap Pelayanan Polri Polres Semarang [Community Satisfaction with Police Services at Semarang Police Resort]. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Indonesia, 2(1), 51–67.
21.
QueirósA.FariaD.AlmeidaF. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.887089
22.
SantosoP. (2008). Administrasi Publik: Teori dan Aplikasi Good Governance [Public Administration: Theory and Application of Good Governance]. Refika Aditama.
23.
SulistiyowatiW. (Ed.). (2018). Buku Ajar Kualitas Layanan: Teori dan Aplikasinya [Textbook on Service Quality: Theory and Its Application] (1st ed.). Umsida Press.
24.
SvaraJ. H. (Ed.). (2022). The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning.
25.
TelebaunaN. G. (2018). Implementasi Pembangunan Zona Integritas Menuju Wilayah Bebas Korupsi dan Wilayah Birokrasi Bersih Melayani di Kantor Kementrian Agama Kota Medan. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 4–16.
26.
TimbulengM.JohannesR. A.PangkeyI.MamontoF. H. (2023). Analisis Etika Pelayanan Publik: Studi pada Kantor Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Provinsi Sulawesi Utara [Analysis of Public Service Ethics: A Study at the Regional Development Planning Agency Office of North Sulawesi Province]. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Pemerintahan Daerah, 15(2), 208–221.
27.
TurkyilmazA.AkmanG.OzkanC.PastuszakZ. (2011). Empirical study of public sector employee loyalty and satisfaction. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(5), 675–696. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635571111137250
28.
ViyurintinaViyurintinaE.SisdiantoE. (2024). Good Governance dan Kualitas Laporan Keuangan [Good Governance and the Quality of Financial Reports]. Jurnal Media Akademikf (JMA), 2(4)
29.
WarnerL. M. (2023). Ethics in public service. In FarazmandA. (Ed.) Global encyclopedia of public administration, public policy, and governance (pp. 4394–4398). Springer.
30.
ZulfirmanR. (2022). Implementasi Metode Outdoor Learning dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Agama Islam di MAN 1 Medan [Implementation of Outdoor Learning Method to Improve Student Learning Outcomes in Islamic Religious Education at MAN 1 Medan]. Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Pengajaran: JPPP, 3(2), 147–153.
