Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Why does the United States as a third party intervene abroad in responding to humanitarian crises? While liberals argue that the purpose of an intervention is to protect victims of human rights violations, realists contend that interventions have little relation to humanitarian concerns and aim, instead, at certain national interests such as securing an oil supply. Making scientific progress, in explaining the determinants of US humanitarian intervention, requires confronting these theoretical positions with data. Drawing on a cross-national, time-series data analysis of 153 countries for the years 1981–2005, the quantitative research presented in this study is the first of its kind to evaluate the relative importance of these competing theoretical perspectives. After controlling for other variables such as democracy and media coverage, this study finds evidence that the United States is likely to use force in a manner consistent with the theory put forth by liberals. This finding indicates that US humanitarian interventions are utilized for the purpose of preserving liberal norms and moral values rather than for pursuing national interests.

Keywords

Humanitarian intervention human rights violations liberalism realism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

(2000) Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Available at: http://www.princeton.edu/csdp/events/Achen121201/achen.pdf

Bagnoli

(2006) Humanitarian intervention as a perfect duty. In: Williams

Nardin

(eds) Humanitarian Intervention: NOMOS XLVII. New York: New York University Press, pp. 117–148.

Baum

Potter

PBK

(2008) The relationship between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: Toward a theoretical synthesis. Annual Review of Political Science. 11: 39–65.

Beardsley

Schmidt

(2012) Following the flag or following the charter?: Examining the determinants of UN involvement in international crises, 1945–2002. International Studies Quarterly 56(1): 33–49.

Beck

Katz

Tucker

(1998) Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science 42(4): 1260–1288.

Bennett

Stam

(2000) EUGene: A conceptual manual. International Interactions 26(2): 179–204.

Bercovitch

Regan

(2004) Mediation and international conflict management: A review and analysis. In: Maoz

Mintz

Morgan

Palmer

Stoll

(eds) Multiple Paths to Knowledge in International Relations. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 249–272.

Binder

(2009) Humanitarian crises and the international politics of selectivity. Human Rights Review 10(3): 327–348.

Chiozza

(2009) Anti-Americanism and the American World Order. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

10.

Choi

S-W

(2011) Re-evaluating capitalist and democratic peace models. International Studies Quarterly 55(3): 759–769.

11.

Choi

S-W

James

(2003) No professional soldiers, no militarized interstate disputes? A new question for neo-Kantianism. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47(6): 796–816.

12.

Choi

S-W

James

(2005) Civil–Military Dynamics, Democracy, and International Conflict. New York: Palgrave.

13.

Cingranelli

Richards

(2010) The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) Human Rights Data Project. Human Rights Quarterly 32(2): 401–424.

14.

Cushman

Jr (2012) McCain calls for U.S.-led airstrikes against Syria. New York Times, 5 March.

15.

Fearon

Laitin

(2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.

16.

Finnemore

(2003) The Purpose of Intervention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

17.

Fordham

(2008) Power or plenty? Economic interests, security concerns, and American intervention. International Studies Quarterly 52(4): 737–758.

18.

Gibler

Sarkees

(2004) Measuring alliances. Journal of Peace Research 41 (2): 211–222.

19.

Gleditsch

(2002) Expanded trade and GDP data. Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (5): 712–724.

20.

Hallenberg

(2002) The Worldwide struggle for democracy. In: Ősterdahl

(ed.) Is Intervention Humanitarian? Protecting Human Rights and Democracy Abroad. Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, pp. 50–74.

21.

Heston

Summers

Aten

(2009) Penn World Table Version 6.3. Available at: http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu/php_site/pwt_index.php

22.

Hoffmann

(1996) The Ethics and Politics of Humanitarian Intervention. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

23.

Holzgrefe

Keohane

(eds) (2003) Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.

24.

Karl

Schmitter

(1994) Democratization around the globe: Opportunities and risks. In: Klare

Thomas

(eds) World Security: Challenges for a New Century, 2nd edn. New York: St Martin’s Press, pp. 43–62.

25.

Kisangani

Pickering

(2008) International military intervention, 1989–2005. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Data Collection no. 21282, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

26.

Kraemer

(2006) Addicted to oil: Strategic implications of American oil policy. Available at: http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/pub705.pdf

27.

Kurth

(2006) Humanitarian intervention after Iraq: Legal ideals vs. military realities. Orbis 50(1): 87–101.

28.

Lauren

(2003) The Evolution of International Human Rights: Visions Seen, 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

29.

Lischer

(2005) Dangerous Sanctuaries: Refugee Camps, Civil War, and the Dilemmas of Humanitarian Aid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

30.

Little

(1987) Revisiting intervention: A survey of recent developments. Review of International Studies 13(1): 49–60.

31.

Marshall

(2008) Forcibly displaced populations, 1964–2008. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm

32.

Marshall

Jaggers

(2007) POLITY IV Project. Available at: http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/p4manualv2006.pdf

33.

Mearsheimer

(2001) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

34.

Meernik

(1996) United States military intervention and the promotion of democracy. Journal of Peace Research 33(4): 391–402.

35.

Morgenthau

(1967) To intervene or not to intervene. Foreign Affairs 45(3): 425–436.

36.

Murdie

Davis

(2010) Problematic potential. Human Rights Quarterly 32(1): 49–72.

37.

Oseghale

(1993) Political Instability, Interstate Conflict, Adverse Changes in Host Government Policies and Foreign Direct Investment. New York: Garland.

38.

Ősterdahl

(2002) Humanitarian intervention. In: Ősterdahl

(eds) Is Interventional Humanitarian? Uppsala: Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University, pp. 3–9.

39.

Pape

(2012). Why we shouldn’t attack Syria (yet). New York Times, 2 February, p. A25.

40.

Pearson

Baumann

(1993a) International military intervention, 1946–1988. Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, Data Collection no. 6035, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

41.

Pearson

Baumann

(1993b) International Military Intervention, 1946–1988. St Louis, MO: University of Missouri–St Louis, Center for International Studies.

42.

Pearson

Baumann

Pickering

(1994) Military intervention and realpolitik. In: Wayman

Diehl

(eds) Reconstructing Realpolitik. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 205–226.

43.

Pearson

Walker

Stern

(2006) Military intervention and prospects for democratization. International Journal of Peace Studies 11(2): 63–86.

44.

Pease

Forsythe

(1993) Human rights, humanitarian intervention, and world politics. Human Rights Quarterly 15(2): 290–314.

45.

Peters

(2003) Courting future resource conflict. Energy, Exploration & Exploitation 21(1): 29–60.

46.

Pickering

Kisangani

(2009) The International military intervention data set. Journal of Peace Research 46(4): 589–600.

47.

Pickering

Kisangani

(2010) Diversionary despots? American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 477–493.

48.

Regan

(2000) Civil Wars and Foreign Powers: Outside Intervention in Intrastate Conflict. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

49.

Roberts

(1993) Humanitarian war: Military intervention and human rights. International Affairs 69(3): 429–449.

50.

Ron

Romos

Rodgers

(2005) Transnational information politics. International Studies Quarterly 49 (3): 557–589.

51.

Roth

(2004) Setting the standard: Justifying humanitarian intervention. Harvard International Review 26(2): 58–63.

52.

Rubin

(2004) Hating America: A History. New York: Oxford University Press.

53.

Russett

Oneal

(2001) Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W.W. Norton.

54.

Salehyan

Gleditsch

(2006) Refugees and the spread of civil war. International Organization 60(2): 335–366.

55.

Soderlund

Briggs

Hildebrandt

Sidahmed

(2008) Humanitarian Crises and Intervention. Sterling, VA: Kumarian Press.

56.

Talbott

(2005) Which Rights Should be Universal? New York: Oxford University Press.

57.

Talentino

(2005) Military Intervention after the Cold War: The Evolution of Theory and Practice. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

58.

Walzer

(1977) Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.

59.

Wheeler

(2000. Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

60.

Wood

Gibney

(2010) The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI. Human Rights Quarterly 32(2): 367–400.

61.

World Bank (2010) World Development Indicators, 2010. Washington, DC: World Bank.

62.

Yoon

(1997) Explaining U.S. intervention in Third World internal wars, 1945–1989. Journal of Conflict Resolution 41(4): 580–602.

63.

Zorn

CJW

(2001) Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data. American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 470–490.