While ethnically diverse countries are generally believed to be more violent than homogenous ones, previous research has been unable to establish a clear connection between ethnic diversity and violent repression. We argue that political authorities’ tendency to violently repress their citizens cannot be explained by the ethnic composition of society per se but by the power distribution between ethnic groups. In a global sample of countries for the period 1977–2010, we find statistical evidence that the level of violent repression increases with the share of the population excluded from state power on the basis of ethnic affiliation. We combine this with a case study of the Republic of Guinea and conclude that political authorities come to see excluded ethnic groups as threats and rely on violent repression to maintain their ethnic dominance.
AcemogluDJohnsonSRobinsonJA (2001) The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review91(5): 1369–1401.
2.
Africa Report (1993) Guinea schedules first multi-party elections. Africa Report38(6): 11.
3.
AlesinaADevleeschauwerAEasterlyWKurlatSWacziargR (2003) Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth8: 155–194.
4.
Amnesty International (1994) Amnesty International Report 1994. Amnesty International Publications.
5.
Amnesty International (1996) Amnesty International Report 1996. Amnesty International Publications.
6.
Amnesty International (1997) Amnesty International Report 1997. Amnesty International Publications.
7.
Amnesty International (1999) Amnesty International Report 1999. Amnesty International Publications.
BBC (1993) President Conte on recent clashes, denounces tribalism. BBC Monitoring Service: Africa, 4October.
10.
BBC (1998) Opposition leader Alpha Conde returns for presidential election. BBC Monitoring Service: Africa, 4December.
11.
BeckNKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
12.
BrownCBoswellT (1997) Ethnic conflict and political violence: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Political and Military Sociology25(1): 111–130.
13.
CamaraM (2000) From military politization to militarization of power in Guinea-Conakry. Journal of Political and Military Sociology28: 311–326.
14.
CedermanL-EWimmerAMinB (2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel?: New data and analysis. World Politics62(1): 87–119.
15.
CheibubJAGandhiJVreelandJR (2010) Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice143(1–2): 67–101.
16.
CingranelliDLRichardsDL (1999) Measuring the level, pattern and sequence of government respect for physical integrity rights. International Studies Quarterly43(2): 407–417.
17.
CingranelliDLRichardsDL (2010) The Cingranelli and Richards (CIRI) human rights data project. Human Rights Quarterly32(2): 401–424.
18.
ClarkAMSikkinkK (2013) Information effects and human rights data: Is the good news about increased human rights information bad news for human rights measures?Human Rights Quarterly35(3): 539–568.
19.
ConradCR (2011) Constrained concessions: Beneficent dictatorial responses to the domestic political opposition. International Studies Quarterly55(4): 1167–1187.
20.
DavenportC (1995) Multi-dimensional threat perception and state repression. American Journal of Political Science39(3): 683–713.
21.
DavenportC (2007) State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science10(1): 1–23.
22.
DennyEKWalterBF (2014) Ethnicity and civil war. Journal of Peace Research51(2): 199–212.
23.
Escribà-FolchA (2013) Repression, political threats, and survival under autocracy. International Political Science Review34(5): 543–560.
24.
FjeldeH (2010) Generals, dictators, and kings: Authoritarian regimes and civil conflict, 1973–2004. Conflict Management and Peace Science27(3): 195–218.
25.
FofanaL (1999) Politics-Guinea: Opposition leaders under attack. Inter Press Service, 4January.
26.
GeddesBWrightJFrantzE (2014) Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics12(2): 313–331.
27.
GerringJ (2007) Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GriffithsT (1993) Guinean opposition warns of possible civil war. Reuters News, 11November.
29.
GroelsemaR (1998) The dialectics of citizenship and ethnicity in Guinea. Africa Today45(3–4): 411–422.
30.
GurrTR (2000) Peoples Versus States: Minorities at Risk in the New Century. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.
31.
HaklaiO (2000) A minority rule over a hostile majority: The case of Syria. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics6(3): 19–50.
32.
HillDWJonesZM (2014) An empirical evaluation of explanations for state repression. American Political Science Review108(3): 661–687
33.
HorowitzDL (1985) Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
Human Rights Watch (2006) The perverse side of things. Human Rights Watch18(7).
35.
KaufmannEPHaklaiO (2008) Dominant ethnicity: From minority to majority. Nations and Nationalism14(4): 743–767.
36.
KingGTomzMWittenbergJ (2010) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science44(2): 341–355.
37.
LeeCLindstromRMooreWHTuranK (2004) Ethnicity and repression: The ethnic composition of countries and human rights violations. In: CareySPoeSC (eds), Understanding Human Rights Violations: New Systematic Studies.Aldershot: Ashgate.
38.
MarshallMGGurrTRJaggersK (2014) Polity IV project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2013. Dataset users’ manual. Available from: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm
MontalvoJGReynal-QuerolM (2005) Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. The American Economic Review95(3): 796–816.
41.
NordåsRDavenportC (2013) Fight the youth: Youth bulges and state repression. American Journal of Political Science57(4): 926–940.
42.
PelegI (2007) Democratizing the Hegemonic State: Political Transformation in the Age of Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
PfluegerCEVangS (2015) A robust test for weak instruments in Stata. The Stata Journal15(1): 216–225.
44.
PoeSCTateCN (1994) Repression of human rights top personal intergrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review88(4): 853–872.
45.
RoesslerP (2011) The enemy within: Personal rule, coups, and civil war in Africa. World Politics63(2): 300–346.
SchmidtE (2005) Mobilizing the Masses: Gender, Ethnicity, and Class in the Nationalist Movement in Guinea, 1939–1958. London: Heinemann.
48.
TemudoMP (2011) From “people’s struggle” to “this war of today”: Entanglements of peace and conflict in Guinea–Bissau. Africa78(2): 245–263.
49.
TeorellJCharronNDahlbergSHolmbergSRothsteinBSundinPSvenssonR (2013) The Quality of Government Dataset, version 15May13. Available from: http://qog.pol.gu.se/data
USSD (1989) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1989. United States Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
52.
USSD (1991) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 1991. United States Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor.
53.
VreelandJR (2008) The effect of political regime on civil war: Unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(3): 401–425.
54.
WalkerS (2007) Are regimes in diverse societies more repressive? A crosstemporal, crossnational analysis. Political Science59(1): 23–44.
55.
WalkerSPoeSC (2002) Does cultural diversity affect countries’ respect for human rights?Human Rights Quarterly24(1): 237–263.
56.
WimmerA (2013) Waves of War: Nationalism, State Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57.
WimmerACedermanL-EMinB (2009) Ethnic politics and armed conflict: A configurational analysis of a new global data set. American Sociological Review74(2): 316–337.
58.
WoodRMGibneyM (2010) The Political Terror Scale (PTS): A re-introduction and a comparison to CIRI. Human Rights Quarterly32(2): 367–400.
