Persistent brideprice inflation has been linked to greater political violence. However, empirically testing this argument is complicated by the paucity of data on brideprice. We argue that despite the lack of over-time brideprice data, one can proxy for variation in marriage markets using changes to population, economic growth, and marriage rates themselves, thereby offering a clearer test of the brideprice–violence relationship. Our analysis suggests that there is little empirical support for such a relationship, and concludes that the previous support was largely due to data limitations and omitted confounds.
AlesinaADevleeschauwerAEasterlyWKurlatSWacziargR (2003) Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 155–194.
2.
AndersonS (2007) The economics of brideprice and dowry. Journal of Economic Perspectives21(4): 151–174.
3.
ArceDGCrosonRTAEckelCC (2011) Terrorism experiments. Journal of Peace Research48(3): 373–382.
4.
BeachDPedersonRB (2016) Causal Case Study Methods: Foundations and Guidelines for Comparing, Matching, and Tracing. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5.
BeckNEpsteinDLJackmanSO’HalloranSL (2001) Alternative models of dynamics in binary time-series-cross-section models: The example of state failure. Working Paper. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7916/D8HT2W65
6.
BennettACheckelJT (2015) Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
BlochFRaoV (2002) Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. The American Economic Review92(4): 1029–1043.
8.
BlundellRGriffithRWindmeijerF (2002) Individual effects and dynamics in count data models. Journal of Econometrics108(1): 113–131.
9.
De JuanAPierskallaJH (2016) Civil war violence and political trust: Microlevel evidence from Nepal. Conflict Management and Peace Science33(1): 67–88.
FearonJDLaitinDD (2003) Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review97(1): 75–90.
12.
FranzeseRJHaysJCCookSJ (2016) Spatial- and spatiotemporal-autoregressive probit models of interdependent binary outcomes. Political Science Research and Methods4(1): 151–173.
13.
GilliganMJPasqualeBJSamiiC (2013) Civil war and social cohesion: Lab-in-the-field evidence from Nepal. American Journal of Political Science58(3): 604–619.
14.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed conflict 1946-2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
15.
GoodyJR (1973) Bridewealth and dowry in Africa and Eurasia. In: GoodyJRTambiahSJ (eds), Bridewealth and Dowry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.1–58.
16.
GurrT (1970) Why Men Rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
HadeniusATeorellJ (2007) Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy18(1): 143–156.
18.
HatemiPKMcDermottR (2012) A neurobiological approach to foreign policy analysis: Identifying individual differences in political violence. Foreign Policy Analysis8(2): 111–129.
19.
HegreHSambanisN (2006) Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset. Journal of Conflict Resolution50(4): 508–535.
20.
HiroseKImaiKLyallJ (2017) Can civilian attitudes predict insurgent violence? Ideology and insurgent tactical choice in civil war. Journal of Peace Research54(1): 47–63.
21.
HudsonVMMatfessH (2017) In plain sight: The neglected linkage between brideprice and violent conflict. International Security42(1): 7–40.
22.
HudsonVMBowenDLNielsenPL (2015) Clan governance and state stability: The relationship between female subordination and political order. American Political Science Review109(3): 535–555.
23.
Ish-ShalomP (2013) Democratic Peace: A Political Biography. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
24.
KalyvasSNBalcellsL (2010) International system and technologies of rebellion: How the end of the Cold War shaped internal conflict. American Political Science Review104(3): 415–429.
25.
LiQ (2005) Does democracy promote or reduce transnational terrorist incidents?Journal of Conflict Resolution49(2): 278–297.
26.
MulderMB (1995) Bridewealth and its correlates: Quantifying changes over time. Current Anthropology36(4): 573–603.
27.
RaoV (1993) The rising price of husbands: A hedonic analysis of dowry increases in rural India. Journal of Political Economy101(4): 666–677.
28.
ReiterD (2015) The positivist stsudy of gender and international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution59(7): 1301–1326.
29.
SjobergLKaderaKThiesCG (2018) Reevaluating gender and IR scholarship: Moving beyond Reiter’s dichotomies toward effective synergies. Journal of Conflict Resolution62(4): 848–870.
30.
START (2018) Global Terrorism Database [Data file]. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. Available from http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd
31.
ThiesCG (2010) Of rulers, rebels, and revenue: State capacity, civil war onset, and primary commodities. Journal of Peace Research47(3): 321–332.
UrdalH (2006) A clash of generations? Youth bulges and political violence. International Studies Quarterly50: 607–629.
34.
WalshJIPiazzaJA (2010) Why respective physical integrity rights reduces terrorism. Comparative Political Studies43(5): 551–577.
35.
WeidmannNBKuseDGleditschKS (2010) The geography of the international system: The CShapes Dataset. International Interactions36(1): 86–106.
36.
WilsonMCPiazzaJA (2013) Autocracies and terrorism: Conditioning effects of authoritarian regime type on terrorist attacks. American Journal of Political Science57(4): 941–949.
37.
WoodRMThomasJL (2017) Women on the frontline: Rebel group ideology and women’s participation in violent rebellion. Journal of Peace Research54(1): 31–46.
38.
YairOMiodownikD (2016) Youth bulge and civil war: Why a country’s share of young adults explains only non-ethnic wars. Conflict Management and Peace Science33(1): 25–44.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
